Revising the Portuguese exit tax (Understanding the concept and dealing with the case)

AuthorVasco Branco Guimarães
PositionTax Law Professor at the Lisbon Academy
Pages1-9
European Tax St udies 1/2010
News and Commentary - Exit T ax: Comparative Analysis in a EU P erspective (n. 1/2009)
© Copyright Seast – All rights re served
1
Revising the Portuguese exit tax
(Understanding the concept and dealing with the case)
Vasco Branco Guimarães1
1. Introduction. General Remarks
Starting first January 2010 some changes were introduced to the IR C2
(company taxation). Can we still see situations where the concept of exit
tax – as ruled by ECJ - can be found? In an environment where exists
freedom of movement f or persons, capital and goods conducting to freedom
of establishment can the act of cha nging reside nce determine taxation? The
question was a lready answered in the ECJ Judgment of Court Case C-9/023
known as Lasteyrie du Saillant the name of the Author of the complaint
against the French legislation that introduced in 1999 a disposition that
would tax the latent increase in securities held but not sold by a taxpayer
that transferred his residence f or another Member State.
Although the French State argued that t he taxpayer could avoid payment by
suspending the taxat ion trough the setting up of guarantees a nd the aim of
the measure w as to avoid tax planning or avoidance the Court ruled that:
“The principle of freedom of establishment laid dow n by Arti cle 52 of the EC
Treaty4 (now, after ame ndment, Article 43 EC) must be interpreted as
precluding a Membe r S tate from establishing, in order to prevent a risk of
tax av oidance, a mechanism f or taxing as yet unrealised increases in value
such as that laid down by Article 167a of the French Code Général des
Impôts, where a taxpayer transfers his tax residence outside that State.”
1 Tax Law Professor at t he Lisbon Academy.
2 To understand th e co ncept and basi c feat ures of IR C see, Manuel Pires, in European Tax
Studies nº1/2009.
3 European Court of Ju stice, Judgment of 11 Mar ch 2004, C-9/02, case Lasteyr ie du Saillant.
4 EC Treaty.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT