Tribunal de Justicia

Decision Type

Latest documents

• Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 2 April 2020.
• Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 2 April 2020.
• Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#Stadtwerke Neuwied GmbH v RI.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/55/EC — Common rules for the internal market in natural gas — Consumer protection — Article 3(3) and point (b) of Annex A — Transparency of contractual terms and conditions — Obligation to give consumers adequate notice directly of an increase in charges.#Case C-765/18.
• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Sexta) de 2 de abril de 2020.#Caisse pour l'avenir des enfants contra FV y GW.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Artículo 45 TFUE — Seguridad social de los trabajadores migrantes — Reglamento (CE) n.º 883/2004 — Artículo 1, letra i) — Libre circulación de los trabajadores — Igualdad de trato — Ventajas sociales — Directiva 2004/38/CE — Artículo 2, punto 2 — Reglamento (UE) n.º 492/2011 — Artículo 7, apartado 2 — Subsidio familiar — Concepto de “miembros de la familia” — Exclusión de los hijos del cónyuge de trabajadores no residentes — Diferencia de trato con los hijos del cónyuge de trabajadores residentes — Justificación.#Asunto C-802/18.
• Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 2 April 2020.
• Conclusions de l'avocat général M. H. Saugmandsgaard Øe, présentées le 2 avril 2020.
• Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 2 April 2020.
• Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 2 April 2020.#European Commission v Republic of Poland and Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Decisions (EU) 2015/1523 and (EU) 2015/1601 — Article 5(2) and 5(4) to 5(11) of each of those decisions — Provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece — Emergency situation characterised by a sudden influx of third-country nationals into certain Member States — Relocation of those nationals to other Member States — Relocation procedure — Obligation on the Member States to indicate at regular intervals, and at least every three months, the number of applicants for international protection who can be relocated swiftly to their territory — Consequent obligations leading to actual relocation — Interests of the Member States linked to national security and public order — Possibility for a Member State to rely on Article 72 TFEU in order not to apply EU legal acts of a binding nature.#Joined Cases C-715/17 and C-718/17.
• Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia (Sala Novena) de 2 de abril de 2020.#Landkreis Südliche Weinstraße contra PF e.a.#Procedimiento prejudicial — Libre circulación de los trabajadores — Reglamento (UE) n.º 492/2011 — Hijos de trabajadores fronterizos — Ventajas sociales — Sistema de reembolso de los gastos de transporte escolar — Requisito de domicilio en un Land — Exclusión de los hijos escolarizados en dicho Land y residentes en un Estado miembro distinto del Estado miembro de escolarización — Exclusión de los nacionales que residen en los demás Länder.#Asunto C-830/18.
• Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 2 de abril de 2020.

Featured documents

• Conclusions de l'avocat général M. G. Hogan, présentées le 11 février 2020.
• Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Szpunar, presentadas el 10 de septiembre de 2019.
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 February 2020.#Uniwersytet Wrocławski v Research Executive Agency.#Appeal — Action for annulment — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation of parties in direct actions before the Courts of the European Union — Lawyer representing the applicant as a third party — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-515/17 P.
• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2016.#GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Definition — Internet — Hyperlinks giving access to protected works, made accessible on another website without the rightholder’s consent — Works not yet published by the rightholder — Posting of such links for a profit.#Case C-160/15.
• Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2015.#C More Entertainment AB v Linus Sandberg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(2) — Direct broadcast of a sporting fixture on an internet site.#Case C-279/13.
• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 April 2017.#Stichting Brein v Jack Frederik Wullems.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Midden-Nederland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual and industrial property — Directive 2001/29/EC — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Definition — Sale of a multimedia player — Add-ons — Publication of works without the consent of the right holder — Access to streaming websites — Article 5(1) and (5) — Right of reproduction — Exceptions and limitations — Lawful use.#Case C-527/15.
• Google Ireland
• Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber), 13 May 2014.#Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional.#Personal data — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of such data — Directive 95/46/EC — Articles 2, 4, 12 and 14 — Material and territorial scope — Internet search engines — Processing of data contained on websites — Searching for, indexing and storage of such data — Responsibility of the operator of the search engine — Establishment on the territory of a Member State — Extent of that operator’s obligations and of the data subject’s rights — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 7 and 8.#Case C‑131/12.
• Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 January 2018.#PM v AH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad.#Case C-604/17.
• Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Siebte Kammer) vom 30. Januar 2020.#Anton van Zantbeek VOF gegen Ministerraad.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Art. 56 AEUV – Art. 36 des Abkommens über den Europäischen Wirtschaftsraum – Freier Dienstleistungsverkehr – Steuer auf in einem Mitgliedstaat abgeschlossene oder ausgeführte Börsengeschäfte – Ungleichbehandlung zum Nachteil von Dienstleistungsempfängern, die sich gebietsfremder gewerblicher Vermittler bedienen – Beschränkung – Rechtfertigung.#Rechtssache C-725/18.