Tribunal de Justicia

Latest documents

• Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 13 février 2020.#République hellénique contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonds européen d’orientation et de garantie agricole (FEOGA), section “Garantie”, Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République hellénique – Règlement (CE) no 1782/2003 – Règlement (CE) no 796/2004 – Régime d’aides à la surface – Notion de “pâturages permanents” – Corrections financières forfaitaires.#Affaire C-252/18 P.
• Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 13 février 2020.#Spetsializirana prokuratura contre TX et UW.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive (UE) 2016/343 – Présomption d’innocence et droit d’assister à son procès dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 8, paragraphes 1 et 2 – Conditions requises par une réglementation nationale aux fins de la tenue d’un procès par défaut – Absence de comparution des personnes poursuivies à certaines audiences pour des raisons soit dépendantes, soit indépendantes de leur volonté – Droit à un procès équitable.#Affaire C-688/18.
• Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin J. Kokott vom 13. Februar 2020.
• Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts G. Pitruzzella vom 13. Februar 2020.
• Conclusions de l'avocat général M. G. Hogan, présentées le 11 février 2020.
• Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts M. Bobek vom 6. Februar 2020.
• Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts M. Bobek vom 6. Februar 2020.
• Conclusiones de la Abogado General Sra. E. Sharpston, presentadas el 6 de febrero de 2020.
• Schlussanträge der Generalanwältin J. Kokott vom 6. Februar 2020.
• Schlussanträge des Generalanwalts M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona vom 6. Februar 2020.

Featured documents

• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2016.#GS Media BV v Sanoma Media Netherlands BV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Definition — Internet — Hyperlinks giving access to protected works, made accessible on another website without the rightholder’s consent — Works not yet published by the rightholder — Posting of such links for a profit.#Case C-160/15.
• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber), 27 March 2014.#Emiliano Torralbo Marcos v Korota SA and Fondo de Garantía Salarial.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 2 de Terrassa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Judicial fees and deposits required for lodging appeals in employment law cases — Failure to implement EU law — Scope of EU law — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C‑265/13.
• Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 30 April 2019.
• Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Gyula Kiss and CIB Bank Zrt. v Emil Kiss and Gyuláné Kiss.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Case C-621/17.
• Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 December 2013. # Fercal - Consultadoria e Serviços Lda v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Case C-159/13 P.
• Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 August 2018.#Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Information society — Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights — Article 3(1) — Communication to the public — Concept — Publication online, without the consent of the rightholder, of a photograph previously published on another website without any restrictions and with the consent of the rightholder — New public.#Case C-161/17.
• Conclusiones de la Abogado General Sra. J. Kokott, presentadas el 13 de junio de 2019.
• Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for underground and submarine power cables — Market allocation in connection with projects — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Determination of the value of sales — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C-589/18 P.
• Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 October 2018.#Bastei Lübbe GmbH & Co. KG v Michael Strotzer.#Request for a preliminary ruling from Landgericht München I.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Copyright and related rights — Directive 2001/29/EC — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Compensation in the event of file-sharing in breach of copyright — Internet connection accessible by members of the owner’s family — Exemption from liability of the owner without the need to specify the nature of the use of the connection by the family member — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 7.#Case C-149/17.
• Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 30 April 2014.#Árpád Kásler and Hajnalka Káslerné Rábai v OTP Jelzálogbank Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria.#Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in a contract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer — Articles 4(2) and 6(1) — Assessment of the unfairness of the contractual terms — Exclusion of terms relating to the main subject­ matter of the contract or the adequacy of the price and the remuneration provided they are drafted in plain intelligible language — Consumer credit contracts denominated in foreign currency — Terms relating to the exchange rate — Difference between the buying rate of exchange applicable to the advance of the loan and the selling rate of exchange applicable to its repayment — Powers of the national court when dealing with a term considered to be unfair — Substitution of the unfair term by a supplementary provision of national law — Whether lawful.#Case C‑26/13.