An Analysis of the Comprehensive Implementation of Strategic Plans in Emerging Economies: The United Arab Emirates as a Case Study

Date01 June 2016
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12068
Published date01 June 2016
An Analysis of the Comprehensive
Implementation of Strategic Plans in
Emerging Economies: The United Arab
Emirates as a Case Study
Said Elbanna and Yasir Fadol
College of Business and Economics, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
Despite the potentially important impact of strategy implementation on organizational performance, relatively
little has been discovered so far about its antecedents and consequences. This study aims to help fill this gap by
exploring the antecedents and consequences of the comprehensiveness of strategic plan implementation. Out of
500 questionnaires, 231 usable ones were collected from United Arab Emirates (UAE) public organizations. We
find that our three factors of strategy formulation, namely, adoption of intended mode of strategy, enhancing
employees’ participation, and minimizing political behavior significantly influence the comprehensiveness of
strategic plan implementation, which in turn has a significant positive impact on the effectiveness of strategic
planning. We discuss our empirical results, the potential influence of culture, implications for both theory and
practice, the limitations of the research and several avenues for future study.
Keywords: comprehensiveness; implementation of strategic plan; strategic planning; effectiveness of strategic
planning; United Arab Emirates
Introduction
Although strategy implementation is widely perceived to
be a significant determinant of organizational perfor-
mance, several studies argue for the paucity of research
into the factors which affect the successful implementa-
tion of strategy. For example, Andrews et al. (2011)
claim that authors in the field of strategy have acknowl-
edged the lack of empirical research linking the process
of strategy implementation to organizational perfor-
mance. Similarly, fewstudies of strategic planning in the
Arab Middle East have been conducted (Elbanna, 2012)
and the results are less clear in relation to strategy imple-
mentation than in relation to formulation (Aldehayyat
and Anchor, 2010).
Strategy implementation is a multifaceted and
complex process which can be defined as ‘the communi-
cation, interpretation, adoption and enactment of stra-
tegic plans’ (Noble, 1999: 120). Similar to the literature
on strategy formulation (Fredrickson, 1984; Elbanna,
2006), that on strategy implementation suggests that
there is a range of possible models to choose from
(Bourgeois and Brodwin, 1984), at one end of the spec-
trum being a rational/formal model and at the other a
purely incremental one (Andrews et al., 2011). For the
purpose of this study,we use the term comprehensiveness
of the strategic plan implementation, which is defined as
‘the extent to which an organization attempts to be
exhaustive or inclusivein implementing its strategic plan
by carrying out all the activities and taking all the actions
required for its effective execution.’ Considering the
seminal work of Fredrickson (1984), comprehensiveness
can be considered as something denoting a measure of
rationality in implementing strategic plans. The multifac-
eted nature of this term makes it particularly valuable for
understanding the implementation process of a strategic
plan and its impact on organizational outcomes. As such,
the comprehensiveness of the strategic plan implementa-
tion can enable an organization to improve its perfor-
mance outcomes, including the effectiveness of its
strategic planning.
Johnson (2004) argues that there is a strategy-to-
performance gap and claims that 66% of corporate
strategy is never implemented. This suggests that the
problem lies somewhere in the process of strategy for-
mulation and/or strategy implementation (Crittenden
Correspondence: Said Elbanna, College of Business and Economics,
Qatar University, P. O. Box 2713, Doha, Qatar. Tel: +974 7401 8562.
E-mail: selbanna@qu.edu.qa
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12068
© 2016 European Academy of Management
European Management Review, Vol. 13, (201 )
6
9
75 8

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT