Annex 4: survey questionnaires

AuthorCSES, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (European Commission), Maastricht University, PPMI
Pages163-186
Study suppo rti ng t he eva luat ion of t he op erat ion of t he Consu m er s, Heal th,
Agr icult ure an d Food Execu tiv e Agen cy ( 201 4-2016)
163
AN NEX 4 : SUR VEY QU ESTI ON NAI RES
Fin a l qu e st ion nai re for sur v ey A ( ope n ca lls for p rop osal s, o per a tio na l gr a nts, m on o-
an d m ul ti-b ene fic iar y gra nt s)
1 . Gr ant s
I . A pplica tio n proce ss
1 . H ow did yo u f ind ab out th e f undi ng oppor tunit ies off ered by CHA FEA?
(Mul tiple answ ers are po ssible)
Resear ch Par ticipan t Por tal
AWP
CHAFEAs w ebsite
Nat ional Cont act Poin ts/ Nati onal Focal p oint
EU Perm anen t Rep resent ati on
Recom men dation by colleagues, super ior s
etc.
Social med ia
Online a dvertising (e. g. ads in search
engines or social net work ing sites)
EU ev ent or p rom oti onal ma terial (e .g.
infor mat ion days, an EU in fo. stand at a
conference et c.)
Research Enqu iry Serv ice
Medi a (e.g . a specialised m agazi ne)
My wor k or inv itat ion as a n ex pert
evalu at or
Oth er ( plea se specif y)
Do not kn ow/ cann ot answ er
2. Plea se asse ss t he foll ow ing a spect s of t he [ project n am e] ap plicatio n
pr ocess:
Strongly
agree
Rat her
agree
Neither
agree
nor
disagree
Rat her
disagree
Strongly
disagree
Do no t
kn ow / can not
an sw e r
Inf orm ati on f or
app licants ( e.g.
abo ut the call
object ives,
eligibil ity and
select ion crit eri a,
docu men tat ion
neede d, FAQs
etc.) was easy t o
find
Inf orm ati on f or
app licants ( e.g.
abo ut the call
object ives,
eligibil ity and
select ion crit eri a,
docu men tat ion
neede d, FAQs
etc.) w as clear
I k new w ho t o
Study suppo rti ng t he eva luat ion of t he op erat ion of t he Consu m er s, Heal th,
Agr icult ure an d Food Execu tiv e Agen cy ( 201 4-2016)
164
con tact for any
quest ion( s) I h ad
or w her e to g et
hel p wh en
pr epar ing my
app licat ion
I k new w ho t o
con tact for any
quest ion( s) I h ad
or w her e to g et
hel p wh en
sub mit tin g m y
app licat ion
The r equirem ents
for the ap plicat ion
pr ocess (e.g. th e
volu me of t he
pr oposal,
requ irem ent s for
sup port ing
docu ments, etc.)
were r eason able
and proport ionat e
The ev alua tion
pr ocess wa s clear
and tr ansparent
The electr oni c to ol
used for
sub mit tin g the
app licat ion was
user-f riendly
Other pract icaliti es
(please specif y)
3. Woul d you ha ve any com ment s rega rdi ng the ap plic ati on ph ase of
CHAFEAs calls? I n par ticul ar, w hat sim plif icat ion an d se rvi ce i mprov em ent
measure s w ould you sug gest ?
4. Befo re su ccessfu lly appl ying for [pr oject n am e] , h ad yo u unsucce ssfu lly
ap plied for a not her gr ant m an age d by CH AFEA/ EAH C? I f ye s, h ow m any
ti m e s?
To w hat exte n t w a s a cl ear explanat ion provided for y our applica t ion ( s) n ot
be ing sel ected?
Ver y cl ear
Clear
Neither clear nor uncl ear

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT