Annex 8: Evaluation matrix - Partnership Evaluation

• Author: Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO) (European Commission), Landell Mills International
• Pages: 186-188

Annexes

186

Annex 8: Evaluation matrix - Partnership Evaluation

Criteria

Question

Sub-questions

Judgement Criteria

Methods

Data Sources

Coherence

EQ1 How well aligned were DG

ECHO and the NRC?

1.1 How aligned were priorities, strategies

and objectives?

1.2 How aligned were needs assessments

and multi-hazard risk and vulnerability

analyses aligned?

1.3 How aligned were advocacy priorities

and efforts?

1.4 Did NRC follow DG ECHO’s visibility

guidelines?

Priorities, strategies and objectives were

similar

NRC assessment and vulnerability analyses

met DG ECHO standard

NRC advocacy priorities aligned with DG

ECHO i) at global level ii) at country level

NRC met visibility standard

Document analysis

Interviews

NRC Global Policy

and Programme

Policy Papers;

Annual Reports; DG

ECHO Annual

Priority statements;

INFORM, FCA;

Annual Reports;

Country Factsheets

Final reports

EQ2 How coherent was the

policy level dialogue between

the two partners?

2.1 How strategic, structured, functional and

timely was the dialogue between NRC

and DG ECHO?

2.2 By what means did dialogue take place

Evidence of strategic dialogue on policies

and priorities

Evidence of structural regularity

Evidence of clear purpose

Evidence dialogue was time-responsive

Document analysis

Strategic

communications

Minutes of meetings

Meeting Schedule