Bodies for the promotion of equal treatment (article 13 Directive 2000/43)
| Author | Chiara Favilli |
| Pages | 54-60 |
54
7BODIES FOR THE PROMOTION OF EQUAL TREATMENT (Article 13 Directive
2000/43)
a)Body designated for the promotion of equal treatment irrespective of racial/ethnic
origin according to Article 13 of the Racial Equality Directive
The requirement to introduce a body for the promotion of equal treatment is covered in
Article 7 of Legislative Decree 215/2003, transposing Directive 2000/43/EC. The decree
establishes an ‘office’ within the Department for Equal Opportunities of the Presidency of
the Council of Ministers. According to Article 7(1), the promotion of equal treatment and
the elimination of any sort of discrimination on grounds of racial and ethnic origin are the
general and exclusive tasks of the office. UNAR’s remit has been extended to cover all
grounds of discrimination by a ministerial directive (an internal act of the Government
assessing the specific tasks of each Government department) issued in 2010, renewed in
2012 and valid until the Government decides otherwise.
The director of the office is appointed by the Prime Minister or by a minister on his behalf
(Article 7(4) of Legislative Decree 215/2003). Its internal organisation is set out by a Prime
Minister’s Decree adopted on 11 December 2003 (Costituzione e organizzazione interna
dell’Ufficio per la promozione della parità di trattamento e la rimozione delle
discriminazioni, di cui all’art. 29 della legge comunitaria 1° marzo 2002, n. 39). The office
fulfils two services: one devoted to actions against discrimination; the other devoted to
research and relations with other institutions.
According to Article 3 of the Decree, 21 officials shall be employed, including one general
executive, one executive for each service and 18 officials. Moreover, other officials may be
recruited, seconded either from other Prime Minister’s departments (up to a maximum of
five), or from other Government departments. This includes judges, state attorneys,
experts and advisers without civil servant status (up to a maximum of five) (Article 7(5)
of Legislative Decree 215/2003). In June 2019, the Government appointed Triantafillos
Loukarelis as General Director.
UNAR’s competences include the provision of assistance to victims of discrimination in
pursuing their complaints in judicial or administrative proceedings and surveys on
discrimination, but without infringing on the prerogatives of the judicial authorities.
b) Political, economic and social context of the designated body
In Italy, there is a general lack of interest regarding the equality body and regarding bodies
dealing with human rights in general. No independent body has been designated to deal
with discrimination (not even on the grounds of gender) or human rights. On the contrary,
there appears to be sharp hostility, judging from recurring questions asked by Members of
Parliament to the Government, sometimes including requests to close UNAR or to limit its
remit to race and ethnic origin, as required by Legislative Decree 215/2003.101
There is no evidence of a popular debate on the designated body, which is not even known
about by most people, even those who are more supportive of equality and diversity. UNAR
took centre stage in the national media only recently, when a scandal on its allocation of
funding was discovered, in addition to one previous occasion when an MP reacted to a
letter sent by UNAR’s director asking for more balanced speeches when dealing with
migrants.102 As far as equality and diversity in general are concerned, the popular debate
has mostly been influenced by hostility against migrants. In particular, there is an
increasing trend to link crimes committed by migrants to the general policy regarding
migration and expulsion, and even to integration policies. It appears that there is no place
for a popular consensus on equality and diversity.
101 See: http://www.camera.it/leg17/410?idSeduta=0748&tipo=stenografico.
102 See: http://www.camera.it/leg17/410?idSeduta=0746&tipo=documenti_seduta.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations