CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland.
Jurisdiction | European Union |
Celex Number | 62020CJ0709 |
ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2021:602 |
Date | 15 July 2021 |
Docket Number | C-709/20 |
Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)
15 July 2021 ( *1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – National of a Member State without an activity residing in the territory of another Member State on the basis of national law – The first paragraph of Article 18 TFEU – Non-discrimination based on nationality – Directive 2004/38/EC – Article 7 – Conditions for obtaining a right of residence for more than three months – Article 24 – Social assistance – Concept – Equal treatment – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – Transition period – National provision excluding Union citizens with a right of residence for a fixed period under national law from social assistance – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 1, 7 and 24)
In Case C‑709/20,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Appeal Tribunal for Northern Ireland (United Kingdom), made by decision of 21 December 2020, received at the Court on 30 December 2020, in the proceedings
CG
v
The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland,
THE COURT (Grand Chamber),
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, J.-C. Bonichot, A. Prechal, E. Regan, M. Ilešič, L. Bay Larsen, A. Kumin and N. Wahl, Presidents of Chambers, T. von Danwitz, K. Jürimäe (Rapporteur), C. Lycourgos, I. Jarukaitis, N. Jääskinen, I. Ziemele and J. Passer, Judges,
Advocate General: J. Richard de la Tour,
Registrar: C. Strömholm, Administrator,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 4 May 2021,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
– |
CG, by R. Drabble and T. de la Mare QC, T. Royston and G. Sarathy, Barristers, and by M. Black and S. Park, Solicitors, |
– |
the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland, by C. Cooley, acting as Agent, and by T. McGleenan QC and L. McMahon, Barrister at law, |
– |
the United Kingdom Government, by F. Shibli and S. McCrory, acting as Agents, and by D. Blundell QC, and J. Smyth, Barrister, |
– |
the European Commission, by E. Montaguti and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents, |
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 24 June 2021,
gives the following
Judgment
1 |
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 18 TFEU. |
2 |
The request has been made in proceedings between CG, who has dual Croatian and Netherlands nationality and has resided in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) since 2018, and the Department for Communities in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom), concerning the latter’s refusal to grant her social assistance. |
Legal context
European Union law
3 |
The first paragraph of Article 18 TFEU provides: ‘Within the scope of application of the Treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.’ |
4 |
In accordance with Article 20(1) TFUE: ‘Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall be additional to and not replace national citizenship.’ |
5 |
Article 21(1) TFEU provides: ‘Every citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in the Treaties and by the measures adopted to give them effect.’ |
The Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom
6 |
The sixth, eighth and ninth paragraphs of the preamble to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 2020 L 29, p. 7, ‘the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom’), which was adopted on 17 October 2019 and entered into force on 1 February 2020, state: ‘Recognising that it is necessary to provide reciprocal protection for Union citizens and for United Kingdom nationals, as well as their respective family members, where they have exercised free movement rights before a date set in this Agreement, and to ensure that their rights under this Agreement are enforceable and based on the principle of non-discrimination; recognising also that rights deriving from periods of social security insurance should be protected, … Considering that it is in the interest of both the Union and the United Kingdom to determine a transition or implementation period during which – notwithstanding all consequences of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the Union as regards the United Kingdom’s participation in the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, in particular the end, on the date of entry into force of this Agreement, of the mandates of all members of institutions, bodies and agencies of the Union nominated, appointed or elected in relation to the United Kingdom’s membership of the Union – Union law, including international agreements, should be applicable to and in the United Kingdom, and, as a general rule, with the same effect as regards the Member States, in order to avoid disruption in the period during which the agreement(s) on the future relationship will be negotiated, Recognising that, even if Union law will be applicable to and in the United Kingdom during the transition period, the specificities of the United Kingdom as a State having withdrawn from the Union mean that it will be important for the United Kingdom to be able to take steps to prepare and establish new international arrangements of its own, including in areas of Union exclusive competence, provided such agreements do not enter into force or apply during that period, unless so authorised by the Union’. |
7 |
Part one of that agreement, enshrined in the common provisions, includes Articles 1 to 8. Article 2(a) and (c) of the agreement states: ‘For the purposes of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:
…
|
8 |
Article 4 of that agreement, entitled ‘Methods and principles relating to the effect, the implementation and the application of this Agreement’, provides in paragraphs 1 to 4: ‘1. The provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of Union law made applicable by this Agreement shall produce in respect of and in the United Kingdom the same legal effects as those which they produce within the Union and its Member States. Accordingly, legal or natural persons shall in particular be able to rely directly on the provisions contained or referred to in this Agreement which meet the conditions for direct effect under Union law. 2. The United Kingdom shall ensure compliance with paragraph 1, including as regards the required powers of its judicial and administrative authorities to disapply inconsistent or incompatible domestic provisions, through domestic primary legislation. 3. The provisions of this Agreement referring to Union law or to concepts or provisions thereof shall be interpreted and applied in accordance with the methods and general principles of Union law. 4. The provisions of this Agreement referring to Union law or to concepts or provisions thereof shall in their implementation and application be interpreted in conformity with the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down before the end of the transition period.’ |
9 |
Part two of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom, entitled ‘Citizens’ rights’, contains Articles 9 to 39. Under Article 9(c)(i) of that agreement: ‘For the purposes of this Part, and without prejudice to Title III, the following definitions shall apply: …
|
10 |
Article 10(1) of that agreement states: ‘Without prejudice to Title III, this Part shall apply to the following persons:
…’ |
11 |
Article 12 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom provides: ‘Within the scope of this Part, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 18 TFEU shall be prohibited in the host State and the State of work in respect of the persons referred to in Article 10 of this Agreement.’ |
12 |
Article 13(1) of that agreement provides: ‘Union citizens and United Kingdom nationals shall have the right to reside in the host State under the limitations and conditions as set out in Articles 21, 45 or 49 TFEU and in Article 6(1), points... |
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mercado Interior de la Unión Europea
... ... ↑ CG v The Department ... ↑ CG v The Department for Communities ... ↑ CG v The Department for Communities in Northern ... ↑ CG v The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland ... ...
-
Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 2 June 2022.
...und Anstreicher (C‑256/19, EU:C:2020:523, points 44 et 48). 44 Arrêt du 15 juillet 2021, The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland (C‑709/20, EU:C:2021:602, point 45 Voir, en ce sens, arrêt du 13 décembre 2018, Rittinger e.a. (C‑492/17, EU:C:2018:1019, points 29 à 34). 46 Voir, en ......
-
Confédération paysanne and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.
...la Corte, in via di principio, è tenuta a statuire (sentenza del 15 luglio 2021, The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland, C‑709/20, EU:C:2021:602, punto 54 e giurisprudenza ivi 33 Il diniego della Corte di statuire su una questione pregiudiziale proposta da un giudice nazionale è......
-
Wilo Salmson France SAS v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti and Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală - Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi.
...EU:C:2015:400, Rn. 24 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung, sowie vom 15. Juli 2021, The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland, C‑709/20, EU:C:2021:602, Rn. 54 und die dort angeführte 49 Da somit für Fragen, die das Unionsrecht betreffen, eine Vermutung der Entscheidungserheblich......
-
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Comune di Ginosa.
...vom 15. Dezember 1995, Bosman, C‑415/93, EU:C:1995:463, Rn. 61 und vom 15. Juli 2021, The Department for Communities in Northern Ireland, C‑709/20, EU:C:2021:602, Rn. 83 Im vorliegenden Fall betrifft der Ausgangsrechtsstreit die Verlängerung von Konzessionen und nicht die Rechtsfrage, ob ei......
-
The Politics of Free Movement of People in the United Kingdom: Beyond Securitization and De‐securitization?
...Social Justice and the Cautionary Tale ofthe UK (London: Bloomsbury).O’Brien, C. (2021a) ‘Memo: Pre-settled Status and Benefits: C-709/20 CG v the Department forCommunities in Northern Ireland’. Memo for House of Commons Work and Pension Commit-tee. Available at: https://www.eurightshub.yo......