Commission Regulation (EC) No 1095/2007 of 20 September 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the third stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (Text with EEA relevance )

• Published date: 21 September 2007
• Subject Matter: Plant health legislation
• Official Gazette Publication: Official Journal of the European Union, L 246, 21 September 2007

21.9.2007 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 246/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1095/2007

of 20 September 2007

amending Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the third stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC and Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

(1) Article 8(2) of Directive 91/414/EEC provides that the Commission undertakes a programme of work for the gradual examination of active substances on the market two years after the date of notification of this Directive. This programme is still ongoing.

(2) The second and third stage of work are laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 of 28 February 2000 laying down the detailed rules for the implementation of the second and third stages of the work programme referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (2) and Commission Regulation 1490/2002 of 14 August 2002 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the third stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC and amending Regulation (EC) No 451/2000 (3). The fourth stage of work is laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2229/2004 of 3 December 2004 laying down further detailed rules for the implementation of the fourth stage of the programme of work referred to in Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/414/EEC (4).

(3) Several substances in the third and fourth stages are still in the assessment phase. It appears necessary to speed up the examination process. Depending on whether a substance is already under peer review or not, for certain aspects of the procedure, different provisions should apply.

(4) To speed up the examination process the workflow of the peer review and relationship between notifiers, Member States, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the Commission and the obligations of each of the parties for the implementation of the programme should be adapted without harming the level of safety for health and the environment.

(5) The resources of the EFSA should be used efficiently. Where there are clear indications that the active substance concerned meets the criteria referred to in Article 5(1) of Directive 91/414/EEC, and in particular does not have any harmful effects on humans or animal health or on groundwater or any unacceptable influence on the environment, that substance should be included in Annex I to that Directive. Such clear cases would not require detailed scientific advice from the EFSA before the substance is included in Annex I. The EFSA should, however, deliver its view on those substances later, in particular to ensure a harmonised approach when Member States apply the uniform principles at the evaluation of authorisations. Where, on the contrary, there are clear indications that an active substance has harmful affects; the Commission is not required to have this clear situation confirmed, so it should have the possibility to decide on non-inclusion without consulting the EFSA.

(6) The EFSA should focus on cases where the remaining doubts need to be resolved before a decision on the inclusion of the active substance concerned can be taken.

(7) To further speed up procedures, it should be possible to grant a longer withdrawal period in cases where there are such remaining doubts and notifiers agree to withdraw their support of the inclusion of the active substance. This procedure should only apply to cases where there are no clear indications that the substance has harmful effects on humans or animal health or on groundwater or any unacceptable influence on the environment.

(8) To identify cases where there are clear indications of either a substance having no harmful effects or, on the contrary, a substance having such effects, criteria should be set out.

(9) In order to ensure that the deadlines for evaluation are met, and to ensure equal treatment of all notifiers, the current legislation provides that notifiers may not submit new studies after a certain stage of the assessment, subject to limited exceptions. This general principle should be retained, but it is appropriate to clarify when notifiers may submit new information other than studies.

(10) Regulations (EC) No 1490/2002 and (EC) No 2229/2004 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(11) The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002

Regulation (EC) No 1490/2002 is amended as follows:

1. Articles 11 and 12 are replaced by the following: ‘Article 11 Receipt of and access to the draft assessment report 1. After receiving the updated summary dossier and the draft assessment report referred to in Article 10(1) the EFSA shall, within 30 days, acknowledge to the rapporteur Member State receipt of that report. In exceptional cases where the draft assessment report clearly does not fulfil the requirements concerning the format recommended by the Commission, the Commission shall agree with the EFSA and the rapporteur Member State on a period for resubmission of an amended report. This period shall not exceed two months. 2. The EFSA shall without delay communicate the draft assessment report to the Commission, the other Member States and the notifiers setting a time period of no more than two months for the submission of comments by those Member States and the notifiers. It shall collate the comments it receives, including available comments from the EFSA, and forward them to the Commission, Member States and the notifiers. 3. The EFSA shall make available at specific request or keep available for consultation by any person the following: (a) the draft assessment report except the elements thereof which have been accepted as confidential in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 91/414/EEC; (b) the list of any data required for the evaluation in view of the possible inclusion of the active substance in Annex I to that Directive as finalised by the EFSA where it has finalised such a list. Article 11a Examination of the draft assessment report The Commission shall, without delay, examine the draft assessment report and the recommendation by the rapporteur Member State and the comments received from other Member States, the EFSA and from the notifiers in accordance with Article 11(2). Article 11b Active substance with clear indications that they do not have any harmful effects If there are clear indications that it may be expected that the active substance does not have any harmful effects on human or animal health or on groundwater or any unacceptable influence on the environment, as set out in Annex V, Article 12(1)(a) and (2)(a) shall apply. Article 11c Consultation of the EFSA 1. Where Article 11b does not apply, the Commission may, at any time during the evaluation, ask the EFSA to carry out a peer review of the full draft assessment report or to focus on specific points including points related to criteria set out in Annex VI. The EFSA shall organise a consultation of Member States experts including the rapporteur Member State. Where the Commission requests the EFSA to carry out a full peer review, the EFSA shall deliver its conclusion at the latest six months after the request. Where the Commission does not request a full peer review, but only a conclusion on specific points, the period shall be reduced to three months. The submission of the conclusions shall in any event be no later than 30 September 2008. 2. If during the peer review there are clear indications that an active substance is expected to have harmful effects on human or animal health or on groundwater as set out in Annex VI, the EFSA shall inform the Commission. The Commission may take a Decision as referred to in Article 11f. 3. The Commission and the EFSA shall agree on a schedule for the delivery of the conclusions in order to facilitate the planning of the work. The Commission and the EFSA shall agree on the format in which the conclusions of the EFSA are submitted. Article 11d Submission of additional information after the draft assessment report has been submitted to the EFSA 1. Without prejudice to Article 7 of Directive 91/414/EEC, submission of new studies shall not be accepted. 2. Where the EFSA considers that additional information from the notifier is necessary to comply with a request made by the Commission under Article 11c, the rapporteur Member State shall request that information. Such requests shall be made explicitly and in writing, setting a time period for submission of one month. They shall not concern the submission of new studies. The rapporteur Member State shall inform the Commission and the EFSA of such requests in writing. The rapporteur Member State shall, within one month after the receipt of such information, evaluate the information received and send its evaluation to the EFSA. 3. Information submitted by the notifier but which has not been requested, or which has not been submitted before the end of the time period referred to in paragraph 2, shall not be taken into account unless this information has been

...