European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62020CJ0278 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2022:503 |
| Docket Number | C-278/20 |
| Date | 28 June 2022 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 23 de marzo de 2023.
...Călin (C‑676/17, EU:C:2019:700, point 42). 24 Arrêt du 28 juin 2022, Commission/Espagne (Violation du droit de l’Union par le législateur) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, points 59 et 25 Voir, en ce sens, arrêt du 21 novembre 2002, Cofidis(C‑473/00, EU:C:2002:705, point 37). 26 Dans mes conclusio......
-
Napfény-Toll Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.
...C‑591/10, EU:C:2012:478, punto 28, e del 28 giugno 2022, Commissione/Spagna (Violazione del diritto dell’Unione da parte del legislatore), C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, punto 48 Ciò premesso, il fatto che una normativa nazionale o una prassi amministrativa nazionale prevedano che il termine in c......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 January 2023.
...2019, Călin (C‑676/17, EU:C:2019:700, paragraph 42). 36 Judgment of 28 June 2022, Commission v Spain (Breach of EU law by the legislature) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, paragraphs 59 and 37 See, to that effect, judgment of 21 November 2002, Cofidis (C‑473/00, EU:C:2002:705, paragraph 37). 38 In......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 1 December 2022.
...et C‑48/93, EU:C:1996:79, point 51), ainsi que du 28 juin 2022, Commission/Espagne (Violation du droit de l’Union par le législateur) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, point 70 Voir, notamment, arrêts du 24 janvier 2012, Dominguez (C‑282/10, EU:C:2012:33, point 27), et du 13 juillet 2016, Pöpperl (......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 23 de marzo de 2023.
...Călin (C‑676/17, EU:C:2019:700, point 42). 24 Arrêt du 28 juin 2022, Commission/Espagne (Violation du droit de l’Union par le législateur) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, points 59 et 25 Voir, en ce sens, arrêt du 21 novembre 2002, Cofidis(C‑473/00, EU:C:2002:705, point 37). 26 Dans mes conclusio......
-
Napfény-Toll Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.
...C‑591/10, EU:C:2012:478, punto 28, e del 28 giugno 2022, Commissione/Spagna (Violazione del diritto dell’Unione da parte del legislatore), C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, punto 48 Ciò premesso, il fatto che una normativa nazionale o una prassi amministrativa nazionale prevedano che il termine in c......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 26 January 2023.
...2019, Călin (C‑676/17, EU:C:2019:700, paragraph 42). 36 Judgment of 28 June 2022, Commission v Spain (Breach of EU law by the legislature) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, paragraphs 59 and 37 See, to that effect, judgment of 21 November 2002, Cofidis (C‑473/00, EU:C:2002:705, paragraph 37). 38 In......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 1 December 2022.
...et C‑48/93, EU:C:1996:79, point 51), ainsi que du 28 juin 2022, Commission/Espagne (Violation du droit de l’Union par le législateur) (C‑278/20, EU:C:2022:503, point 70 Voir, notamment, arrêts du 24 janvier 2012, Dominguez (C‑282/10, EU:C:2012:33, point 27), et du 13 juillet 2016, Pöpperl (......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Los principios de primacía y de efectividad del Derecho de la Unión Europea: algunas reflexiones
...(…)”. Ob.cit. p.100. 73 Quesada López, P.M.: “El principio (…)”. Ob.cit. p.106. 74 STJUE de 28 de junio de 2022, Comisión contra España , C-278/20. 75 STJUE de 3 de septiembre de 2014, Comisión Europea y Reino de España , C-127/12. 76 STJUE de 27 de enero de 2022, Comisión Europea contra Re......
-
Algunas cuestiones pendientes para avanzar en la armonización comunitaria de la imposición directa
...54/2020). Por otra parte, téngase presente que la Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (Gran Sala) de 28 de junio de 2022 (C-278/20) ha declarado incompatible la normativa administrativa reguladora de la responsabilidad patrimonial del Estado Legislador con el Derecho Comu......
-
El vigésimo intento. La declaración del incumplimiento de España por su regulación de la responsabilidad del estado legislador por infracción del Derecho de la Unión. Comentario a la STJ (gran sala) de 28 de junio de 2022 (C-278/20)
...LA RESPONSABILIDAD DEL ESTADO LEGISLADOR POR INFRACCIÓN DEL DERECHO DE LA UNIÓN. COMENTARIO A LA STJUE (GRAN SALA) DE 28 DE JUNIO DE 2022 (C-278/20) THE TWENTIETH ATTEMPT. THE DECLARATION OF SPAIN’S FAILURE TO FULFIL ITS OBLIGATIONS FOR ITS REGULATION OF THE LIABILITY BASED ON LOSS OR HARM ......
-
A vueltas con la responsabilidad por leyes contrarias al Derecho de la Unión Europea
...SE ADELANTA AL TJUE INTERPRETANDO CON CARÁCTER GENERAL EL RÉGIMEN DE LAS LEYES 39 Y 40/2015.— 5. LA SENTENCIA DE 28 DE JUNIO DE 2022, C-278/20, COMISIÓN CONTRA REINO DE ESPAÑA: 5.1.- El artículo 32.5 como “cláusula de cierre”. 5.2. La regulación del “procedimiento” y su compatibilidad con e......