European Commission v Republic of Poland.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2023:139
Docket NumberC-432/21
Date02 March 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 13 July 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 July 2023
    ...2006, Commission/Allemagne (C‑98/03, EU:C:2006:3, point 59) ; et du 2 mars 2023, Commission/Pologne (Gestion et bonne pratique forestières) (C‑432/21, EU:C:2023:139, points 72 et 50 Arrêts du 13 décembre 2007, Commission/Irlande (C‑418/04, EU:C:2007:780, points 83 à 88) ; et du 3 avril 2014......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. P. Pikamäe, presentadas el 14 de septiembre de 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 September 2023
    ...apartado 14 y jurisprudencia citada. 13 Sentencia de 2 de marzo de 2023, Comisión/Polonia (Gestión y buenas prácticas forestales) (C‑432/21, EU:C:2023:139), apartado 32 y jurisprudencia 14 Sentencia de 21 de diciembre de 2016, Comisión/Portugal (C‑503/14, EU:C:2016:979), apartado 16 y juris......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 6 February 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 6 February 2025
    ...(C‑473/19 et C‑474/19, EU:C:2021:166, points 36 et 44). 51 Arrêt du 2 mars 2023, Commission/Pologne (Gestion et bonne pratique forestières) (C‑432/21, EU:C:2023:139, points 77 à 52 Voir l’article 14b, paragraphe 3, de la loi polonaise sur les forêts, tel que reproduit dans l’arrêt du 2 mars......
1 books & journal articles
  • Not easy to ‘green’ old ways: National courts and rights‐based smog cases in Poland
    • European Union
    • Wiley Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law No. 32-1, April 2023
    • 1 April 2023
    ...Accessto justice under the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention (n 13) with regard to such acts isalso restricted; see, e.g., CJEU, Case C-432/21, Commission v Poland, ECLI:EU:C:2023:139paras 176–178; and case ACCC/C/2014/119 (Poland) concerning alleged non-compliancewith articles 7 and 9(......