Context of the paper, authorship and acknowledgements

AuthorHunt, Paula Frederica
Pages6-6
Target Group Discussion Paper Children with disabilities
6
Context of the paper, authorship and acknowledgements
Following the call in 2015 from the European Parliament to int roduce a Child Guarantee
and the sub sequent requ est to the European Commission (EC) in 2017 to implement a
Preparatory Action to expl ore its potential scope, the Commission launched a feasibility
study in 2018 that is aimed at examining and making proposals as to how a specifi c
programme could best be developed in order to fight poverty and social exclusion amongst
the EU’s most disadvantaged children (i.e. children living in precarious family situations,
children residing in institutions, children wit h a migrant background [including refugee
children], and children with disabilities) and to ensur e their a ccess to the five key policy
areas (PAs) identified by the European Parliament, (i .e. free healthcare, free educati on,
free early childhood education and care [ECEC], decent housing , and adequate nutrition).
This Feasibility Study for a Child Guaran tee (FSCG) has been commissioned as a key part
of the Preparatory Action agreed between the EC and the European Parli ament. The FSCG
is managed by a consortiu m consisting of Applica and th e Luxembourg Institute of Socio -
Economic Research (LISER), in collaboration with Eurochild and Save th e Children.
The FSCG is a combination of 28 Country Reports, five Policy Pape rs (one on each of the
five PAs identified by the Parli ament) and four Target Group Discussion Papers (one on
each of the four Target Groups [TGs] identified by the Commission). This work is also being
complemented by specific case studi es highlighting lessons from international funding
programmes, an online consultation with key stakeholders, and focus group consultati ons
with children.
Each TG Discussion Paper examines in detail issues in relation to the access to the five PAs
of children in the TG and r eviews and assesses the strengths and weaknesses of existing
approaches and policies at the national and EU level. It draws heavily on the analysis
presented in the FSCG Inception Report1 that was prepared by the FSC G Core Te am, on
the findings from the 28 FSCG Country Reports, on the five FSCG Policy Papers and on the
results of the FSCG online consultation, as well as on the academic literature and
consultation with key experts.
The draft TG Discussion Papers constituted important resources for the four TG fact-finding
workshops that were organised i n September and October 2019 as pa rt of the FSCG. The
papers were then finalised following the workshops. Discussions at these workshops
together with the findings of the various FSCG reports will feed into an Intermediate
Report, which will provide the basis for discussion at a concluding conference in early 2020.
The final outcomes of the study will then be summarised in the Fin al FSCG Report.
The authors of the four TG Discussion Papers are grateful to Hugh Frazer, Anne-Cathe rine
Guio and Eric Marli er (FSCG Core team), the Country and PA Experts (the l ist of these
experts is provided in the Annex), Eurochild and Save the Children, as well as the fact-
finding workshops’ pa rticipants for their helpful comments and suggestions. All errors
remain the authors’. The EC bears no responsibility for the analyses and conclusions, which
are solely those of the authors.
1 https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1428&langId=en

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT