El desajuste de la vía económico-administrativa al Derecho de la Unión Europea en materia de cuestiones prejudiciales

Pages176-193
Date01 January 2019
Published date01 January 2019
AuthorMaria Teresa Mata Sierra
Subject MatterDerecho Fiscal
News and commentary – peer-reviewed
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-3583/10549
Studi Tributari Europei. Vol.9 (2019)
ISSN 2036-3583
      
        

   
                   
The mismatch of the administrative-economic jurisdiction to the European Union in
order to the inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling
                
               
               
               
           
                 
           
            
                
              
              
Keywords            
     
             
              
             
          
   
1. Consideraciones previas
               
               
           
             
     
                  

   
       
           Diario Ocial n° 115 de 09/05/2008 p. 0164 – 0164
 “El Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea será competente para pronunciarse, con carácter prejudicial: a)
sobre la interpretación de los Tratados; b) sobre la validez e interpretación de los actos adoptadospor las instituciones,
Copyright © 2019 Studi Tributari Europei
The text in this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
II – 65
El desajuste de la vía económico-administrativa al Derecho de la Unión Euro … STE. Vol.9 (2019)
                 
              
        
            
               
             
                   
              
            
       
2. El punto de partida: los hechos
               
                
                 
            
                   
               
             
                
               
               
 
              
                
                 
                 
                  
órganos u organismos de la Unión;Cuando se plantee una cuestión de esta naturaleza ante un órgano jurisdiccional de
uno de los Estados miembros, dicho órganopodrá pedir al Tribunal que se pronuncie sobre la misma, si estima necesaria
una decisión al respecto para poder emitir su fallo. Cuando se plantee una cuestión de este tipo en un asunto pendiente
ante un órgano jurisdiccional nacional, cuyas decisiones no sean susceptibles de ulterior recurso judicial de Derechoin-
terno, dicho órgano estaráobligado a someter la cuestión al Tribunal. Cuando se plantee una cuestión de este tipo en un
asunto pendiente ante un órgano jurisdiccional nacional en relación con una persona privada de libertad, el Tribunal
de Justicia de la Unión Europea se pronunciará con la mayorbrevedad.”
                

   
                      
                
     , La independencia de los órganos económico-administrativos, se cues-
tiona por el TJUE (La sentencia en pleno del TJUE de 21 de enero de 2020)        
                 
    
         “De lo que se merece «lo» económico-
administrativo”              
                 
      
     
                 
                
                  
           
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-3583/10549 II – 66

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex