Entrepreneurship and innovation in a competition context

AuthorSuela Bylykbashi - Khalil Assala - Gilles Roehrich
PositionResearch Professor in Marketing, Brest Business School FRANCE - Research Professor in Finance, Brest Business School FRANCE - Professor in Marketing, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, F-38040 Grenoble FRANCE
Pages9-31
Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences
IIPCCL Publishing, Tirana-Albania
Vol. 2 No. 2
July 2016
ISSN 2410-3918
Acces online at www.iipccl.org
9
Entrepreneurship and innovation in a competition context
Suela Bylykbashi
Research Professor in Marketing
Brest Business School FRANCE
Khalil Assala
Research Professor in Finance
Brest Business School FRANCE
Gilles Roehrich
Professor in Marketing
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, F-38040 Grenoble FRANCE
Abstract
The objective of this research is to explore the relationship between the competitive situation
and the launching strategy of a new product. It also aims to study the internal structure of
the competitive situation. Competition situation is apprehended with 4 variables: strategic
similarity, multimarket competition, market concentration and competition intensity (the rst
three being perceived as antecedents of the last). Launching strategy, strategic similarity and
competition intensity have two internal dimensions: a strategic and a tactical one. Using a
questionnaire, data was collected from 140 managers involved in the recent launching of a
new product in France. The ndings conrmed that competition intensity depends partially
on other variables of the competition situation, and that the laer exert an inuence on the
structure of the launching strategy. These relations vary considerably, according to the sub-
dimensions of the variables. However, other antecedents of competition intensity on the one
hand and of the launching strategy structure on the other hand, are to be sought beyond the
simple competition situation.
Keywords: entrepreneurship, launching strategy, competition intensity, strategic similarity,
multimarket competition, market concentration.
Introduction
Up to the 1980s, entrepreneurship was restricted to creating and developing new
companies. However, the concept of entrepreneurship has been extended, considering
launching new product as corporate entrepreneurship. Jennings and Lumpkin (1989,
p. 489) dened corporate entrepreneurship as ‘‘the extent to which new products
and/or new markets are developed.’’ Several others have emphasized new product
innovation as an important activity in corporate entrepreneurship (Miller, 1983;
Shane and Venkataraman, 2000; Zahra,1995). Consistent with the above stream of
research, our paper focuses on a rm’s new product as a signicant form of corporate
entrepreneurial.
The impact of the launching strategy on new product success has largely been
Vol. 2 No. 2
July 2016
Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences
IIPCCL Publishing, Tirana-Albania
ISSN 2410-3918
Acces online at www.iipccl.org
10
demonstrated by past researches (Easingwood and Beard, 1989; Hultink et al., 1997;
Hultink and Robben, 1999; Hultink et al., 2000; Lee and O’Connor, 2003).
Launching a new product is seen by competitors as a potential threat. Studies
carried out on retaliation by competitors in response to the introduction of a new
product show indeed that retaliation may have a negative inuence on new product
performance.
One can equally consider another – indirect – inuence on new product performance
where competition situation directly impacts the launching strategy structure
(Gatignon et al.; 1990; Hultink et al., 1997). However, lile research has focused on
this relationship and in those studies, the competition situation is restricted in market
concentration.
The rst aim of this research is to study how the competition situation impacts the
structure of the launching strategy. It also aims to study the internal structure of the
competitive situation.
The competition situation corresponds to all the relations and interactions which link
competitors on a market and which come exclusively from competition.
Among several facets of competition situation, four have been retained for this
study: competition intensity, strategic similarity, multi-market competition and
market concentration. In the studies dealing with the relations between these four
variables (Peteraf, 1993 ; Ramaswamy & al., 1994; Baum & Korn, 1996 ; Chen, 1996 ;
Gimeno & Woo, 1996; Gimeno, 1999; Jayachandran & al., 1999) competition intensity
is considered as a consequence of the other three. We adopt this point of view and
consider strategic similarity, multimarket competition and market concentration as
the antecedents of competition intensity. However, lile research has focused on the
competition intensity. With the exception of the work of Porter (1980, 2008), Porter ’s
concept of competition intensity has remained a very theoretical one (Chen, 1996).
The second aim of this research is to go deeper into the competition intensity concept
and to identify the inuence that it exerts on the structure of launch strategy.
Launching strategy must be adapted to the context of the market on which the
product is launched: the targeted demand, the competitors in the market and the
role of distribution, at the same time as it depends on the objectives and the resources
available in the organization. Our choice is to concentrate our research exclusively on
the inuence that competition situation may exert on the distribution of resources in
launching strategy.
The reminder of this article is structured as follows: rst we dene the concepts and
present their internal structure. Then we present our conceptual framework and the
hypothesized relationships. Next we explain the research methodology and review
the nding from a simple of 140 managers involved in the recent launching of a
new product in France. Finally, we discuss the results and we explore managerial
implications, limitations and suggestions for further research.
Conceptual framework and literature review
Competition intensity: denition and internal structure
The competition intensity occupies a central position in strategic group (Porter,
1979 ; Caves et Porter, 1977 ; Zajac et Jones, 1989 ; Cool et Dierickx, 1993; Peteraf,
1993), multimarket competition (Gimeno, 1999; Gimeno et Woo, 1999 ; Jaychandran

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT