From refugee to manager? Organisational socialisation practices, refugees' experiences and polyrhythmic socialisation
Published date | 01 July 2022 |
Author | Renate Ortlieb,Elena Ressi |
Date | 01 July 2022 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12500 |
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
From refugee to manager? Organisational socialisation practices,
refugees’experiences and polyrhythmic socialisation
Renate Ortlieb | Elena Ressi
Institute of Human Resource Management,
University of Graz, Graz, Austria
Correspondence
Renate Ortlieb, Institute of Human Resource
Management, University of Graz,
Elisabethstrasse 50, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Email: renate.ortlieb@uni-graz.at
Abstract
Labour market integration of refugees is a challenge to which employers can
make a major contribution. This study examines how organisational socialisation
practices tailored to the needs of refugees shape the refugees’socialisation and
development. We draw on a longitudinal case study focused on refugees doing
apprenticeships in a supermarket chain in Austria. We show how a set of
organisational practices benefit the refugees. However, these practices, along with
other factors inside and outside the workplace, also complicate the refugees’
progress because they create tensions related to time. We identify three temporal
tensions and propose the concept of ‘polyrhythmic socialisation’to theorise about
the specific shape of these tensions, their causes and consequences. We formulate
recommendations for practitioners and avenues for future research.
KEYWORDS
apprenticeships, case study, organizational socialization, Refugees, time tensions
In the beginning, it was too difficult for me. I
couldn’t speak German very well and there were
so many products [groans]. There aren’t that
many products in Afghanistan. Everything was
new. All the new words. I really had to learn so
much. The first three months were crazy, after
that it was good. Then I got to know my col-
leagues and they were good and nice. Everyone
taught me something. Then things became eas-
ier.Amar, a young refugee from Afghanistan,
about his apprenticeship in Austria
INTRODUCTION
The high numbers of refugees arriving in Europe in the
last decades have sparked research interest about their
integration into the host countries’labour markets. By
illuminating what happens after refugees start working
and prepare for career development in the new organisa-
tion, this article extends the scope of research in this
field beyond its primary concentration on how refugees
find employment (e.g., Cheung & Phillimore, 2014;
Eggenhofer-Rehart et al., 2018; Gericke et al., 2018).
All new employees face countless corporate rules, so
organisations use various measures such as welcome
events, seminars or handbooks to provide the newcomers
with orientation. A well-designed onboarding and
socialisation process is important for long-term outcomes
such as job satisfaction, performance, and career develop-
ment (Batisticˇ,2018; Bauer et al., 2007;Weller
et al., 2019). For refugees, the new workplace environment
may be particularly overwhelming, as the opening quota-
tion from Amar illustrates. This is because refugees typi-
cally do not have time to prepare for living and working
in the new country. They encounter different languages,
cultures and state institutions, and many have no connec-
tions to locals who could share knowledge about work-
place customs in the organisation or in the host country
more generally (Abkhezr et al., 2015; Baranik et al., 2018;
Baran et al., 2018;Colic-Peisker&Tilbury,2006;
Jackson & Bauder, 2014;Knappertetal.,2018).
Thus, the question arises, how can employers address
the special needs of refugee newcomers in order to pro-
vide them with orientation during organisational
socialisation and prepare them for further career develop-
ment? Knowledge about the organisational socialisation
of refugees is crucial to better understand their
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12500
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
© 2022 The Authors. European Management Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Management (EURAM).
European Management Review. 2022;19:185–206. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/emre 185
integration into the labour market. For the integration
to be sustainable, refugees must not only be introduced
well to the initial job but also receive opportunities
for career development (Yakushko et al., 2008;
Zacher, 2019). Yet, there is scant knowledge about ref-
ugees’socialisation and career development in organi-
sations to date.
This study explores the organisational socialisation
process of refugees. It focuses on organisational
socialisation practices and the experiences of refugees,
their managers and co-workers. By the term ‘practice’we
refer to any kind of organizational members’activities,
and we are interested in both the formal measures
designed by human resource (HR) managers to facilitate
the refugee newcomers’socialisation and informal
activities of any organisational member influencing
socialisation. We conducted a qualitative longitudinal
case study in a supermarket chain in Austria, focusing on
six young refugees who served apprenticeships as retail
management assistants. Over a period of roughly a year,
we conducted 42 interviews with the refugees, their man-
agers and co-workers. We found that various
socialisation practices enabled the refugees to internalise
the corporate culture and acquire relevant knowledge,
skills and abilities. However, these practices also created
tensions in the socialisation process, which complicated
the refugees’progress. Specifically, we found that man-
agers and refugees had different expectations and
experiences concerning the refugees’development. Refu-
gees also experienced inconsistencies over time in the
application of organisational rules. Furthermore, issues
outside the company thwarted the refugees’expected
trajectories because the external factors shifted the priori-
ties of both managers and refugees. We developed the
concept of ‘polyrhythmic socialisation’to theorise about
the refugees’socialisation processes and the inherent
tensions.
Our study responds to prior calls for longitudinal
designs to study refugees’career development
(Zacher, 2019) and calls for more research on refugee
integration at the organisational level (Lee et al., 2020).
We contribute to scholarship on the labour market
integration of refugees by providing in-depth empirical
insight into the experiences of refugee newcomers, their
managers and co-workers. In particular, we highlight
the problematic consequences of specific organisational
socialisation practices and events in the refugees’
formative phase as new employees. Our notion of
polyrhythmic socialisation offers a more nuanced
theoretical understanding of the refugees’socialisation
processes.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Following Van Maanen & Schein’s(1979) milestone text,
a large body of research on organisational socialisation
has emerged in the last decades (Batisticˇ&Kaše, 2015).
In line with this literature, we define organisational
socialisation as ‘the process by which an individual
acquires the social knowledge and skills necessary to
assume an organizational role’(Van Maanen &
Schein, 1979, p. 211). This process includes the inter-
nalisation of corporate norms and values as well as the
acquisition of job-specific knowledge, skills and abilities
(Feldman, 1981).
Previous research found that varying organisational
socialisation tactics, understood as the ‘ways in which the
experiences of an individual in transition […] are
structured for [her/him] by others in the organisation’
(Van Maanen & Schein, 1979, p. 230), produce specific
long-term outcomes, such as individuals’role clarity, role
orientation, task mastery, job satisfaction, organisational
commitment and intention to quit (Ashforth et al., 2007;
Bauer et al., 2007; Jones, 1986; Saks et al., 2007; Van
Maanen & Schein, 1979). Research has also highlighted
the important function of co-workers and managers as
socialisation agents (e.g., Cooper et al., 2021;
Kammeyer-Mueller et al., 2013) and the pro-active
behaviour of the newcomers themselves (Bauer
et al., 2007; Saks et al., 2007).
A common theme in the literature that is particularly
relevant for our study addresses the experiences and
activities of newcomers in their initial weeks, which have
particularly formative effects (Ashforth, 2012). For
instance, supportive or undermining behaviour by super-
visors and co-workers in the first few weeks affect the
newcomers’organisational commitment and withdrawal
behaviour 3 months later to a larger extent than support-
ive or undermining behaviour in the following weeks
(Kammeyer-Mueller et al., 2013). Likewise, newcomers
whose expectations are surpassed by the organisation in
their first weeks adjust more easily to their new environ-
ment than newcomers whose expectations are not met or
are met only to the expected degree (Woodrow &
Guest, 2020). Thus, newcomers’initial experiences have
long-lasting consequences for their career development
(Mayrhofer & Gunz, 2020).
Another particularly relevant topic is the role of the
newcomers’social identity. Scholarship on organisational
socialisation has widely neglected newcomers’socio-
demographic characteristics (Cooper-Thomas &
Anderson, 2006). Van Maanen & Schein (1979) intro-
duced the notion of individualised tactics that ‘give each
newcomer a unique set of learning experiences that
allows heterogeneity in their responses’(Jones, 1986,
p. 264). However, this does not mean that socialisation
agents actually do automatically consider the individual
characteristics of newcomers. Van Maanen &
Schein (1979) also pointed out that organisations may
adopt specific socialisation measures for minorities,
using the examples of ‘a black firefighter entering a previ-
ously all white engine company or a woman entering
managerial ranks in the firm that had previously been
186 ORTLIEB AND RESSI
To continue reading
Request your trial