General legal framework

AuthorMaja Kostić-Mandić
Pages15-16
15
1 GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Constitutional provisions on protection against discrimination and the promotion
of equality
The Constitution contains a general prohibition in Article 8 of both direct and indirect
discrimination ‘on any grounds’.14 So far the Constitutional Court has addressed
discrimination issues only in the context of abstract control of legislative complian ce with
the Constitution in relation to social benefits in the childcare system and access to polling
stations for disabled people.15 In addition, Article 7 of the Constitution states that, ‘infliction
or encouragement of hatred or intol erance on any grounds shall be prohibited’. As can be
concluded from this formulation, the constitutional protection from discrimination in
Montenegro is wider than required by the directives, since it includes a potentially limitless
list of grounds. An illustration of what might constitute these grounds can be found in
Article 25 of the Constitution, which provides that:
‘While the exercise of certain human rights and freedoms may be dero gated in time
of war or other public emergency to a necessary extent, the p rohibition of
discrimination cannot be derogated from nor c an derogations be introduced on the
grounds of sex, nationality, race, religion, langu age, ethnic or social origin, political
or other beliefs, financial status or any other personal characteristics.’
Since the concept of discrimination from EU law has not yet been applied in the practice of
the Constitutional Court, this judicial institution analyses the violation of the prin ciple of
non-discrimination/equality before the law, primarily based on principles developed in the
jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Therefore, on the basis of
the l egal reasoning of the Constitutional Court, the analysis of the existence of
discrimination is subject to a procedure consisting of three interdependent elements
(similar, i.e. comparable situations where there is equal or different treatment, diff erence
in treatment based on the individual’s particular status, less fav ourable treatment due to
the individual’s status or equal treatment in significantly differ ent circumstances).16
The Constitutional Court examined the concept of protected grounds in a review of th e
constitutionality of the law on the payment of foreign currency funds of citizens deposited
with a number of banks operating in the territory of Montenegro. In this case, the
Constitutional Court did n ot accept the fact of residence (domicil e) as a protected ground
which could lead to violation of the principle of equality, that is, non -discrimination.17
The C onstitution explicitly guarantees broad special welfare-based protection f or people
with disabilities (Article 68) and equality between men and women (Article 18). With regard
to the latter, the Constitution also provides fo r the state’s duty to dev elop equal
opportunities policy (also A rticle 18). Other provisions of the Constitution c ontain
guarantees of equality before the law (Article 17) and equal protection of rights and
freedoms (Article 19) and prohibit ‘infliction or encouragement of hatred or intolerance on
any grounds’ (Article 7) and ‘operations of political and other organisations directed
towards [...] instigating national, racial and religious and other hatred and intolerance’
(Article 55).
The Constitution permits positive action by providing that, ‘regulations and introduction of
special measures aimed at creating conditions for the exercise of n ational, gender and
overall equality and protection of people who are in an unequal position on any grounds
shall not be considered discrimination’. Under the Constitution, special measures may only
14 Constitution of Montenegro, Article 8, Official Gazette of Montenegro, No. 1/07.
15 Constitutional Court, decision U-I No. 6/16; Constitutional Court, decision U-I No. 32/14.
16 Constitutional Court, decision of 26 December 2012, U-I No 3/09.
17 Constitutional Court, decision of 22 October 2009, U No. 95/08.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT