Global economic development in view of the model of the National States and 'State reasons'

AuthorErion Avllazagaj
PositionLektor, Departamenti i Gjuhes Angleze&Gjermane, Fakulteti i Shkencave Humane, Universiteti 'A.Xhuvani', Elbasan - Albania
Pages620-629
ISSN 2410-759X Balkan Journal of Interdisciplinary Research Special Issue No 1
Acces online at www.iipccl.org IIPCCL Publishing, Tirana-Albania June 2015
620
Global economic development in view of the model of the National States and
“State reasons
Erion Avllazagaj
Lektor, Departamenti i Gjuhes Angleze&Gjermane
Fakulteti i Shkencave Humane
Universiteti “A.Xhuvani”
Elbasan - Albania
One of the most overriding questions today is whether beyond the nation states to supra-
national and global level both the ecological and the social and cultural explosive power
of the world capitalism can be brought again under control
e discovery and control function of markets is undisputed. But markets react only to
messages that are encoded in the language of prices. ey are deaf to the externalities
that they generate in other areas. One of the reasons concerning the opinion of dierent
liberal sociologists is the exhaust of non-renewable natural resources, a massive cultural
alienation and social eruptions in the event to be feared that it is not possible to hedge
those markets politically that cause weakness of the overstretched national states.
In the countries of the advanced capitalist societies during the postwar period, the
environmental threats are exacerbated rather than mitigated; and they have built the
social security systems using welfare bureaucracies that were the self-determination of
their clients (Bloom, David E. and Canning. 2000). But the welfare state has the socially
undesirable consequences of a highly productive economic system actually largely oset
in Europe and other OECD companies during the third quarter of this century.
Capitalism system face for the rst time the redemption of the Republican promise which
does not hinder but enable equal inclusion of all citizens. e democratic constitutional
state guarantees equality in the sense that all should have equal chances to make use of
their rights. John Rawls, the most inuential theorist of political liberalism, spoke in this
context of “fair value” of equally distributed rights (Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1975)
If we understand the text of our Constitutions in this material sense as the realization
of a socially justice, wins the idea of self-legislation which requires that addresses of law
which should understand at the same time as the authors themselves, that have the view
of political dimension of an acting on society itself. When building the welfare state of the
postwar era politicians of all persuasions have been guided by this active understanding
process of the democracy in Europe. Now a day it’s conrmed that this idea has been
realized only within the framework of the nation state model.
But the nation-state is reaching the limits of its performance in the changed context of the
world economy and world society. e political taming has enabled a global unfettered
capitalism as the only example of a reasonably functioning democracy area. e question
is if the national state can be extended to itself beyond national borders, this form of
democratic action of modern societies?
I will examine this question as following. First, we must clear how the nation-state and
democracy are related with each other under pressure in this unique symbiosis. In the

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT