Integrating the Dark Side of Competition into Explanations of Business Failures: Evidence from a Developing Economy

AuthorJoseph Amankwah‐Amoah,Issek Antwi‐Agyei,Hongxu Zhang
Published date01 March 2018
Date01 March 2018
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12131
Integrating the Dark Side of Competition into
Explanations of Business Failures: Evidence
from a Developing Economy
JOSEPH AMANKWAH-AMOAH,
1
ISSEK ANTWI-AGYEI
2
and HONGXU ZHANG
2
1
Kent Business School, University of Kent, Medway, UK
2
School of Economics, Finance & Management, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
In spite of the growing body of literature on the bright side of inter-firm relationships, limited attention has been
paid to the dark side of inter-firm relationships. Using insights of serial entrepreneurs in a developing economy,
we articulate the mechanisms through which adverse rumours and misinformation perpetrated by rivalsfirms
undermine small businesses and lead to decline and eventual collapse. We uncovered that the rumours were made
more potentwhen combined with other factorssuch as prior history of poor and faultyproducts, sensitivity of industry
and intense competition fromrival firms in reducing thelife chance of firms. Our study alsouncovered that inter-firm
backstabbing leads former business owners to form a negative perception of former competitors and their
organizations even after their business collapsed. We conclude by articulating the theoretical and practical
implications.
Keywords: business failure; developing economy; Ghana; Africa
Introduction
Over the past few decades, a growing body of literature
has suggested that inter-firm relationships can provide
conditions for innovation to thrive and access to scarce
financial and human capital (Noordhoff et al. 2011;
Wassmer et al. 2014). One stream of research rooted in
the concept of co-opetitionhas suggested that deep
collaborationand co-operation even among rivals as route
to sustainable competitive advantage (Brandenburger and
Nalebuff 1996; Yu et al. 2013; Bouncken and Fredrich
2016). In spite of a growing body of research on this
bright side of inter-firm relationships, limited attention
has been paid to the effects of dark side of inter-firm
relationships and how they unfold (Anderson and Jap
2005; Reuber and Fischer 2010; Villena et al. 2011).
Although a handful of studies haveexamined dark-side
of inter-firm relationships issues such as conflicts
(Deutsch 1958), opportunistic behaviour (Das 2006) and
deviant behaviour (Clegg et al. 2006; Buchanan 2008),
to date, much of the existing literature has overlooked
the issue. Although some scholars have hinted that
external factors such as business rivalry and inter-firm
backstabbingcan lead to bankruptcy of firms (see Mellahi
and Wilkinson 2004; van Iterson and Clegg 2008), it
remains unclear how the effects unfold to precipitate
business failure.This omission is surprising given that
inter-firm backstabbing remains a unique and common
feature of business practices in informal and under-
developed economies. To date, business failure and
business ethics scholars (e.g., Stokes and Blackburn
2002; Walsh and Bartunek 2011) have largely failed to
articulate the underlying dynamics of backstabbing and
its effects.
Our primary purpose in this paper is to examine the
mechanisms through which inter-firm backstabbing
unfolds to precipitate business failure. We focus on
Ghana as an exemplar setting to illustrate our analysis.
First, Ghanas democracy and its progress over the past
few decades have been regarded as charting course for
African democracy (Robson and Freel 2008). Unlike
other African countries, in Ghana during the past two
decades the presidency has twice changed hands without
violencebut rather through free and fair democratic
elections (The Economist 2013: 50). Indeed, Ghana is
regarded as one of Africas more progressive economies
Correspondence: Joseph Amankwah-Amoah, Kent Business School,
University of Kent, Medway ME4 4TE, UK, Tel: +44 (0) 1634 (88)
8870. E-mailj.amankwah-amoah@kent.ac.uk
European Management Review, Vol. 15, 97109, (2018)
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12131
©2017 European Academy of Management

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT