IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62019CJ0725 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2022:396 |
| Date | 17 May 2022 |
| Docket Number | C-725/19 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 14 de julio de 2022.
...95 et 96) ; du 17 mai 2022, MA (C‑600/19, EU:C:2022:394) ; SPV Project 1503 et autres (C‑693/19, EU:C:2022:395) ; Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396) ; et Unicaja Banco (C‑869/19, 42 D’habitude, le principe d’équivalence ne soulève pas de problème : l’autorité de la chose jugée......
-
FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.
...Morcillo e Abril García, C‑169/14, EU:C:2014:2099, punto 27 nonché giurisprudenza ivi citata, e del 17 maggio 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396, punto 83 Dall’altro lato, in una situazione in cui il procedimento esecutivo è terminato, il consumatore deve essere in grado,......
-
TU and SU v BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA and Next Capital Solutions Limited.
...ist nach Einreichung des vorliegenden Vorabentscheidungsersuchens das Urteil des Gerichtshofs vom 17. Mai 2022, Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396), ergangen. In Rn. 60 dieses Urteils hat der Gerichtshof entschieden, dass Art. 6 Abs. 1 und Art. 7 Abs. 1 der Richtlinie 93/13 dah......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 12 January 2023.
...point 45), du 17 mai 2022, SPV Project 1503 e.a. (C‑693/19 et C‑831/19, EU:C:2022:395, point 61), et du 17 mai 2022, Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396, point 45 Arrêt du 17 mai 2022, SPV Project 1503 e.a. (C‑693/19 et C‑831/19, EU:C:2022:395, point 66). 46 Arrêt du 17 mai 2022......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19
...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......
-
Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, SPV Project 1503 and Others., C-693/19 and C-831/19
...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......
-
Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, Ibercaja Banco, C-600/19
...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......