IO v Impuls Leasing România IFN SA.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number62019CJ0725
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:396
Date17 May 2022
Docket NumberC-725/19
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. M. Campos Sánchez-Bordona, presentadas el 14 de julio de 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 July 2022
    ...95 et 96) ; du 17 mai 2022, MA (C‑600/19, EU:C:2022:394) ; SPV Project 1503 et autres (C‑693/19, EU:C:2022:395) ; Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396) ; et Unicaja Banco (C‑869/19, 42 D’habitude, le principe d’équivalence ne soulève pas de problème : l’autorité de la chose jugée......
  • FY v Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 9 April 2024
    ...Morcillo e Abril García, C‑169/14, EU:C:2014:2099, punto 27 nonché giurisprudenza ivi citata, e del 17 maggio 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396, punto 83 Dall’altro lato, in una situazione in cui il procedimento esecutivo è terminato, il consumatore deve essere in grado,......
  • TU and SU v BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA and Next Capital Solutions Limited.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 4 May 2023
    ...ist nach Einreichung des vorliegenden Vorabentscheidungsersuchens das Urteil des Gerichtshofs vom 17. Mai 2022, Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396), ergangen. In Rn. 60 dieses Urteils hat der Gerichtshof entschieden, dass Art. 6 Abs. 1 und Art. 7 Abs. 1 der Richtlinie 93/13 dah......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 12 January 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 12 January 2023
    ...point 45), du 17 mai 2022, SPV Project 1503 e.a. (C‑693/19 et C‑831/19, EU:C:2022:395, point 61), et du 17 mai 2022, Impuls Leasing România (C‑725/19, EU:C:2022:396, point 45 Arrêt du 17 mai 2022, SPV Project 1503 e.a. (C‑693/19 et C‑831/19, EU:C:2022:395, point 66). 46 Arrêt du 17 mai 2022......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19
    • European Union
    • European Case Law Digest No. 2022-05, May 2022
    • 17 May 2022
    ...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......
  • Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, SPV Project 1503 and Others., C-693/19 and C-831/19
    • European Union
    • European Case Law Digest No. 2022-05, May 2022
    • 17 May 2022
    ...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......
  • Judgment of the Court Grand Chamber of 17 May 2022, Ibercaja Banco, C-600/19
    • European Union
    • European Case Law Digest No. 2022-05, May 2022
    • 17 May 2022
    ...examine of its own motion the potential unfairness of a term Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 May 2022, Impuls Leasing România, C-725/19 Link to the complete text of the judgment Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Princ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT