Judgment of the Court of Justice Fifth Chamber, 6 March 2025, Alajärven Sähkö and Others, C-48/23
| Date | 06 March 2025 |
| Year | 2025 |
33
information necessary to enable him or her to assess the financial consequences of the commitment
undertaken by him or her.
In the fourth place, the Court recalls that, in the assessment of whether a contractual term which has
not b een individually negotiated is unfair, it is for the n ational court to assess, having regard to all t he
circumstances of the case, first, the possible failure to observe the requirement of good faith and,
second, the p ossible existence of a significa nt imbalance to the detriment of th e consumer. The Court
states that such an imbalance is not created by a term in a contract which provides for the payment
by a young sportsperson of remuneration equal to 10% of the income received over the 15 years
following the conclusion of that contract in exchange for the provision of services for development
and career sup port for t hat sportsperson, m erely because that term does not esta blish a link between
the value of the service provided and its co st to t he consumer. The existence o f such an imbalance
must b e assessed in the light , in particular, of the rules ap plicable in nation al law in the absence of an
agreement between the parties, fair and equitable market practices on the date of conclusion of the
contract in the matter of remuneration in the field of sport concerned and all the circumstances
attending the conclusion of that contract, as well as all the other terms of that contract or of another
contract on which it is dependent.
In the fifth place, the Court rules that Directive 93/13 precludes a national court which has found a
term in a co ntract concluded between a seller or supplier and a consumer 45 to be unfair from
reducing the amount payable by the consumer to the extent of the costs actually incurred by the
supplier in the performance of that contract. That power would contribute to eliminating the
dissuasive effect on sellers or suppliers of the straightforward non-application with regard to the
consumer of those unfair terms, in so far as those sellers or suppliers would still be tempted to use
thos e terms in the k nowledge that , even if they were declared invalid, the c ontract could nevertheless
be mo dified, to th e extent necessary, by th e nation al court.
In the last place, the Court finds that, where a contractual term stipulates that, in exchange for the
provision of services for development and career s upport for a sport sperson, a consumer undertak es
to pay remuneration equal to 10% of the income received over the 15 years following the conclusion
of that contract, the fact that the consumer was a minor at the time that contract was concluded and
that that contract was concluded by the minor’s parents on his or her behalf is relevant for the
purposes of assessing whether that term is unfair. In that regard, the referring court is required, when
apply ing Directive 93/ 13, to resp ect the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental
Rights of the European Union, which include the right to property and the rights of the child. 46 Mor e
specifically, that court must take into account the best interests of the child, but that cannot prevent it
from also taking into consideration the fact that C’s parents themselves had knowledge of the world
of professional sport or the fact that C was 17 years old on the date on which that contract was
concluded.
IX. ENERGY
Judgment of the Court of Justi ce (Fifth Chamber), 6 Mar ch 2025, Al ajä rven Sä hkö and
Other s, C-48/23
Link to the full text of the judgment
Reference for a pr eliminary ruling – Internal market fo r electrici ty – Directiv e (EU) 2019/944 – Article 57(4)
and (5) – Independence of national regulatory authority in the exercise of its duties and powers – Policy
guidelines issued by a Member State – Legisl ative amendmen t aimed at r edu cing ele ctricity di stributio n
45 Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Directiv e 93/13.
46 Articles 17 and 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations