Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62016CJ0064 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2018:117 |
| Docket Number | C-64/16 |
| Date | 27 February 2018 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)
27 February 2018 ( *1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 19(1) TEU — Legal remedies — Effective judicial protection — Judicial independence — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Reduction of remuneration in the national public administration — Budgetary austerity measures)
In Case C‑64/16,
REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Supreme Administrative Court, Portugal), made by decision of 7 January 2016, received at the Court on 5 February 2016, in the proceedings
Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses
v
Tribunal de Contas,
THE COURT (Grand Chamber),
composed of K. Lenaerts, President, A. Tizzano, Vice-President, L. Bay Larsen, T. von Danwitz, J.L. da Cruz Vilaça, A. Rosas, E. Levits (Rapporteur) and C.G. Fernlund, Presidents of Chambers, C. Toader, M. Safjan, D. Šváby, M. Berger, A. Prechal, E. Jarašiūnas and E. Regan, Judges,
Advocate General: H. Saugmandsgaard Øe,
Registrar: M. Ferreira, Principal Administrator,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 13 February 2017,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
|
– |
the Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, by M. Rodrigues, advogado, |
|
– |
the Portuguese Government, by L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, M. Rebelo, F. Almeida and V. Silva, acting as Agents, |
|
– |
the European Commission, by L. Flynn and M. França, acting as Agents, |
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 18 May 2017,
gives the following
Judgment
|
1 |
This request for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’). |
|
2 |
The request has been made in proceedings between the Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (Trade Union of Portuguese Judges, ‘the ASJP’) and the Tribunal de Contas (Court of Auditors, Portugal) concerning the temporary reduction in the amount of remuneration paid to that court’s members, in the context of the Portuguese State’s budgetary policy guidelines. |
Legal context
EU law
|
3 |
Article 2 TEU reads as follows: ‘The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities. These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination, tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.’ |
|
4 |
Article 19(1) and (2) TEU provides: ‘1. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall include the Court of Justice, the General Court and specialised courts. It shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of the Treaties the law is observed. Member States shall provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law. 2. ... The Judges and the Advocates-General of the Court of Justice and the Judges of the General Court shall be chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt ...’ |
Portuguese law
|
5 |
Lei n.o 75/2014 — Estabelece os mecanismos das reduções remuneratórias temporárias e as condições da sua reversão (Law No 75/2014 putting in place the mechanisms for the temporary reduction of remuneration and the conditions governing their reversibility) of 12 September 2014 (Diário da República, 1st Series, No 176, of 12 September 2014, p. 4896, ‘Law No 75/2014’), determines, in accordance with Article 1(1) thereof, the temporary application of the mechanism for reducing remuneration in the public sector. |
|
6 |
Article 2 of Law No 75/2014 is worded as follows: ‘1 — Gross monthly income greater than EUR 1500 of persons referred to in paragraph 9, whether already employed on that date or taking up their functions thereafter, in any capacity, shall be reduced as follows:
… 9 — This Law shall apply to the following office-holders and other employees:
… 15 — The rules laid down in this article shall be mandatory and take precedence over all other provisions, whether special or exceptional, or otherwise, and over collective regulatory agreements and contracts of employment, and may not be derogated from or amended by any of the above.’ |
|
7 |
Lei n.o 159-A/2015 — Extinção da redução remuneratória na Administração Pública (Law No 159-A/2015 abolishing the reduction of remuneration in the public administration) of 30 December 2015 (Diário da República, 1st Series, No 254, of 30 December 2015, p. 10006-(4), ‘Law No 159-A/2015’), gradually brought to an end, as from 1 January 2016, the measures to reduce remuneration set out in Law No 75/2014. |
|
8 |
Article 1 of Law No 159-A/2015 provides: ‘This law shall bring to an end the reduction of remuneration provided for in Law [No 75/2014], in the terms set out in the following article.’ |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Sumanan Vethanayagam y otros contra Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken.
...en la actualidad se reconoce en el artículo 47 de la Carta (sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, C‑64/16, EU:C:2018:11, apartado 35). 81 En el contexto específico del artículo 32, apartado 3, del Código de visados, incumbe a cada Estado miembro gar......
-
Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 20 June 2024.
...EU:C:2021:596], apartado 172. 32 Ibidem, apartado 173. 33 Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (C‑64/16, EU:C:2018:117), apartado 34 Sentencia Comisión/Polonia (Independencia y vida privada de los jueces), apartados 269 y 286. 35 El artículo 55, apa......
-
Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 14 mai 2020.#FMS et FNZ contre Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság et Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique d’asile et d’immigration – Directive 2013/32/UE – Demande de protection internationale – Article 33, paragraphe 2 – Motifs d’irrecevabilité – Article 40 – Demandes ultérieures – Article 43 – Procédures à la frontière – Directive 2013/33/UE – Article 2, sous h), et articles 8 et 9 – Rétention – Légalité – Directive 2008/115/UE – Article 13 – Voies de recours effectives – Article 15 – Rétention – Légalité – Droit à un recours effectif – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Principe de primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaire C-924/19 PPU.
...l’exigence d’indépendance, au sens de cet article [voir, en ce sens, arrêts du 27 février 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, C‑64/16, EU:C:2018:117, points 37 et 41 ; du 25 juillet 2018, Minister for Justice and Equality (Défaillances du système judiciaire), C‑216/18 PPU, EU:......
-
Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. J. Richard de la Tour, presentadas el 14 de julio de 2022.
...un acto de la propia Unión»; véanse, en particular, la sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (C‑64/16, EU:C:2018:117), apartado 31 y jurisprudencia citada, y la sentencia Minister for Justice and Equality (Deficiencias del sistema judicial), apartado......
-
AI And The Redefinition Of Law In Code: The Future Of Legal Intention Under Article 4 DSM
...by the Court's reading of Article 19(1) TEU as a guarantee of effective judicial protection in Associaç'o Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (C-64/16), a line of authority developed in Commission v Poland (C-619/18). That guarantee presupposes norms that can be known and contested, which is wh......
-
BREXIT, democracy and the rule of law
...their meaning can be authoritatively determined and the norms which they embody enforced by inde-pendent and impartial courts. Thus in Case C-64/16, Associaç ~ao Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v. Tribunal de Contas,37the CJEU ruled that the Member States are required by EU law to ensure th......
-
Índice de jurisprudencia
...Tiefkühlgemüse eGen (C-516/16, EU:C:2017:1011). Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2018, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (C-64/16, EU:C:2018:117). Sentencia de 28 de junio de 2018, EUIPO/Puma (C-564/16 P, EU:C:2018:509). Sentencia de 25 de julio de 2018, Georgsmarienhütte (C-135/2016,......
-
Poder judicial nacional y primacía del Derecho de la Unión. A propósito de la sentencia del Tribunal constitucional de Polonia K 3/21
...TUE. Esta interpretación, acuñada por primera vez en la STJUE, de 27 de febrero de 2018, Associaçao Sindical dos Juices Portugueses (asunto C-64/16), ha supuesto un cambio radical en el entendimiento que, en el ordenamiento jurídico de la Unión, se tenía del contenido y alcance de dicho art......
-
El tribunal de justicia anula la suspensión temporal del gobernador del banco de Letonia por supuesta corrupción tras proteger la 'independencia' de los miembros del consejo de gobierno del SEBC (TJUE, Rim?e?vic?s y BCE C. Letonia, C-202-238/18, 26 de Febrero de 2019)
...[CPJI]. (1927). S.S. Lotus [Turquía c. Francia], Ser. A, No. 10. Sentencia del TJUE (2018). Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses . C-64/16. ECLI:EU:C:2018:117. Sentencia del TJUE (2018). Bauer . C-569/16 y 570/16. ECLI:EU:C:2018:871. Sentencia del TJUE (2018). Egenberger . C-414/16. E......