Staatsanwaltschaft Freiburg v Franz Keller.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
Celex Number61985CJ0234
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1986:377
Date08 October 1986
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
Docket Number234/85
EUR-Lex - 61985J0234 - EN 61985J0234

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 8 October 1986. - Staatsanwaltschaft Freiburg v Franz Keller. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Amtsgericht Breisach am Rhein - Germany. - Validity of Council and Commission regulations - Labelling of table wine. - Case 234/85.

European Court reports 1986 Page 02897


Summary
Parties
Subject of the case
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

1 . MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS - VALIDITY - ASSESSMENT ONLY IN THE LIGHT OF COMMUNITY LAW

2 . COMMUNITY LAW - PRINCIPLES - FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS - FREEDOM TO PURSUE ONE ' S TRADE OR PROFESSION - LIMITATIONS - PERMISSIBILITY - CONDITIONS

3 . AGRICULTURE - COMMON ORGANIZATION OF THE MARKETS - WINE - DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINE - LABELLING OF TABLE WINE - LIMITATION OF TERMS USED - GENERAL OBJECTIVES - JUSTIFICATION

( COUNCIL REGULATION NO 355/79 , ART . 2 ( 2 ) ( H ); - COMMISSION REGULATION NO 997/81 , ART . 13 ( 6 ))

Summary

1 . THE VALIDITY OF MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE INSTITUTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY CAN BE JUDGED ONLY IN THE LIGHT OF COMMUNITY LAW . A CLAIM THAT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS LAID DOWN IN THE CONSTITUTION OF A MEMBER STATE HAVE BEEN INFRINGED CANNOT IN ITSELF AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF A COMMUNITY MEASURE OR ITS EFFECT WITHIN THAT STATE .

2 . THE FREEDOM TO PURSUE ONE ' S TRADE OR PROFESSION IS PROTECTED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY LEGAL ORDER ONLY SUBJECT TO THE LIMITS JUSTIFIED BY THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES PURSUED BY THE COMMUNITY , ON CONDITION THAT THE SUBSTANCE OF THE RIGHT IS LEFT UNTOUCHED .

WHEREAS THE COMMUNITY RULES ON THE LABELLING OF WINES PLACE CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS WITHIN A CLEARLY DEFINED SPHERE ON THE BUSINESS ACTIVITY OF THE TRADERS CONCERNED , THEY IN NO WAY IMPINGE ON THE ACTUAL SUBSTANCE OF THE FREEDOM TO PURSUE THAT ACTIVITY .

3 . THE PRINCIPLE OF RESTRICTING THE NUMBER OF TERMS WHICH MAY BE USED ON THE LABELLING OF WINES , WHICH IS IMPLEMENTED BY COUNCIL REGULATION NO 355/79 AND COMMISSION REGULATION NO 997/81 ON THE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINES AND GRAPE MUSTS , IS JUSTIFIED ON THE BASIS OF THE GENERAL OBJECTIVES PURSUED BY THE COMMON ORGANIZATION OF THE MARKET IN WINE . IN PARTICULAR THE EXCLUSION OF THE TERM ' DURCHGEGOREN ' ON THE LABELLING OF TABLE WINE IS WARRANTED BY THE GENERAL INTEREST AND HENCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A RESTRICTION , IN A MANNER CONTRARY TO COMMUNITY LAW , OF THE FREE PURSUIT OF THE TRADE OF WINE-GROWER .

Parties

IN CASE 234/85

REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE AMTSGERICHT ( LOCAL COURT ) BREISACH-AM-RHEIN FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT BETWEEN THE

STAATSANWALT ( PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ) FREIBURG

AND

FRANZ KELLER

Subject of the case

ON THE VALIDITY OF PROVISIONS OF COUNCIL REGULATION NO 355/79 OF 5 FEBRUARY 1979 LAYING DOWN GENERAL RULES FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINES AND GRAPE-MUSTS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL 1979 , L 54 , P . 99 ) AND COMMISSION REGULATION NO 997/81 OF 26 MARCH 1981 LAYING DOWN DETAILED RULES FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINES AND GRAPE MUSTS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL 1981 , L 106 , P . 1 ),

Grounds

1 BY AN ORDER OF 2 JULY 1985 , WHICH WAS RECEIVED AT THE COURT ON 25 JULY 1985 , THE AMTSGERICHT BREISACH-AM RHEIN REFERRED A QUESTION TO THE COURT FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY ON THE VALIDITY OF PROVISIONS OF COUNCIL REGULATION NO 355/79 OF 5 FEBRUARY 1979 LAYING DOWN GENERAL RULES FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINES AND GRAPE MUSTS AND COMMISSION REGULATION NO 997/81 OF 26 MARCH 1981 LAYING DOWN DETAILED RULES FOR THE DESCRIPTION AND PRESENTATION OF WINES...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 10 November 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 November 2022
    ...(4/73, EU:C:1974:51, punti da 12 a 14); del 13 dicembre 1979, Hauer (44/79, EU:C:1979:290); e dell’8 ottobre 1986, Keller (234/85, EU:C:1986:377, punto 49 Firmata a Torino il 18 ottobre 1961 e modificata il 3 maggio 1996. 50 Adottata il 9 dicembre 1989 con una dichiarazione di tutti gli Sta......
  • Conclusions de l'avocat général M. G. Pitruzzella, présentées le 14 novembre 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 November 2023
    ...par exemple, arrêt du 23 février 2006, CLT-UFA (C‑253/03, EU:C:2006:129, point 13). 420 Voir arrêt du 8 octobre 1986, Keller (234/85, EU:C:1986:377, point 9). 421 Voir point 167 des présentes conclusions. 422 Voir, à propos de l’article 56 TFUE, arrêt du 8 décembre 2020, Hongrie/Parlement e......
  • T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI).
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 4 May 2023
    ...EU:C:1974:51, punti da 12 a 14), del 13 dicembre 1979, Hauer (44/79, EU:C:1979:290, pag. 3727), e dell’8 ottobre 1986, Keller (234/85, EU:C:1986:377, punto 8). La predetta disposizione si ispira inoltre all’articolo 1, paragrafo 2, della Carta sociale europea, firmata a Torino il 18 ottobre......
  • Procurator Fiscal v Andrew Marshall.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 November 1990
    ...any interference with the right to exercise a professional activity, it must be borne in mind that, as the Court held in its judgment in Case 234/85 Keller [1986] ECR 2897, paragraph 8, limitations may be placed on the exercise of that right if they are justified by the objectives of genera......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia posterior a la Carta
    • European Union
    • El Tribunal de Justicia de Luxemburgo como garante de los Derechos Fundamentales
    • 1 January 2013
    ...de la jurisprudencia de los límites vid. SSTJ de 26 de junio de 1980, NATIONAL PANASONIC, C-136/79; de 8 de octubre de 1986, KELLER, C-234/85; de 21 de diciembre de 1989, HOESCHT, C-46/87 y [167] Quizá es pronto para responder, pero sin duda, como dice CARTABIA "it is undoubtedly a turning ......