Bonnier Audio AB and Others v Perfect Communication Sweden AB.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 62010CJ0461 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:2012:219 |
| Date | 19 April 2012 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
| Docket Number | C‑461/10 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)
19 April 2012 (*1 )
‛Copyright and related rights — Processing of data by internet — Infringement of an exclusive right — Audio books made available via an FTP server via internet by an IP address supplied by an internet service provider — Injunction issued against the internet service provider ordering it to provide the name and address of the user of the IP address’
In Case C-461/10,
REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden), made by decision of 25 August 2010, received at the Court on 20 September 2010, in the proceedings
Bonnier Audio AB,
Earbooks AB,
Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB,
Piratförlaget AB,
Storyside AB
v
Perfect Communication Sweden AB,
THE COURT (Third Chamber),
composed of K. Lenaerts, President of the Chamber, J. Malenovský, (Rapporteur), R. Silva de Lapuerta, E. Juhász and D. Šváby, Judges,
Advocate General: N. Jääskinen,
Registrar: K. Sztranc-Sławiczek, Administrator,
having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 30 June 2011,
after considering the observations submitted on behalf of:
— | Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB and Storyside AB, by P. Danowsky and O. Roos, advokater, |
— | Perfect Communication Sweden AB, by P. Helle and M. Moström, advokater, |
— | the Swedish Government, by A. Falk and C. Meyer-Seitz, acting as Agents, |
— | the Czech Government, by M. Smolek and K. Havlíčková, acting as Agents, |
— | the Italian Government, by G. Palmieri and C. Colelli, acting as Agents, and by S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato, |
— | the Latvian Government, by M. Borkoveca and K. Krasovska, acting as Agents, |
— | the European Commission, by R. Troosters and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents, |
after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 17 November 2011,
gives the following
Judgment
1 | This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Articles 3 to 5 and 11 of Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC (OJ 2006 L 105, p. 54), and of Article 8 of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (OJ 2004 L 157, p. 45, and corrigendum OJ 2004 L 195, p. 16). |
2 | The reference has been made in proceedings between (i) Bonnier Audio AB, Earbooks AB, Norstedts Förlagsgrupp AB, Piratförlaget AB and Storyside AB (‘the applicants in the main proceedings’) and (ii) Perfect Communications Sweden AB (‘ePhone’) concerning the latter’s opposition to an injunction obtained by the applicants in the main proceedings ordering the disclosure of data. |
Legal context
European Union law
Provisions concerning the protection of intellectual property
3 | Article 8 of Directive 2004/48 reads as follows: ‘1. Member States shall ensure that, in the context of proceedings concerning an infringement of an intellectual property right and in response to a justified and proportionate request of the claimant, the competent judicial authorities may order that information on the origin and distribution networks of the goods or services which infringe an intellectual property right be provided by the infringer and/or any other person who:
2. The information referred to in paragraph 1 shall, as appropriate, comprise:
3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall apply without prejudice to other statutory provisions which:
|
Provisions concerning the protection of personal data
4 | Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31) lays down rules relating to the processing of personal data in order to protect the rights of individuals in that respect, while ensuring the free movement of those data in the European Union. |
5 | Article 2(a) and (b) of Directive 95/46 states: ‘For the purposes of this Directive:
|
6 | Article 13 of that directive, entitled ‘Exemptions and restrictions’, provides in paragraph 1: ‘Member States may adopt legislative measures to restrict the scope of the obligations and rights provided for in Articles 6(1), 10, 11(1), 12 and 21 when such a restriction constitutes a necessary measures to safeguard:
|
7 | Under Article 2 of Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37): ‘Save as otherwise provided, the definitions in Directive 95/46/EC and in Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) [(OJ L 108, p. 33)] shall apply. The following definitions shall also apply: …
…
…’ |
8 | Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/58 provides: ‘Member States shall ensure the confidentiality of communications and the related traffic data by means of a public communications network and publicly available electronic communications services, through national legislation. In particular, they shall prohibit listening, tapping, storage or other kinds of interception or surveillance of communications and the related traffic data by persons other than users, without the consent of the users concerned, except when legally authorised to do so in accordance with Article 15(1). This... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Marktgemeinde Straßwalchen and Others v Bundesminister für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend.
...24. ( 15 ) Sentencias Teckal (C‑107/98, EU:C:1999:562), apartado 39; Abraham y otros (EU:C:2008:133), apartado 24, y Bonnier Audio y otros (C‑461/10, EU:C:2012:219), apartado ( 16 ) Véase el punto 36 de las presentes conclusiones. ( 17 ) Sentencias Kraaijeveld y otros (EU:C:1996:404), apart......
-
ŠKO-ENERGO s. r. o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.
...) Sentencias Teckal (C‑107/98, EU:C:1999:562), apartado 39; Abraham y otros (C‑2/07, EU:C:2008:133), apartado 24, y Bonnier Audio y otros (C‑461/10, EU:C:2012:219), apartado ( 12 ) Véanse al respecto mis conclusiones presentadas en los asuntos acumulados Iberdrola y Gas Natural (EU:C:2013:1......
-
Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk.
...transmission’ (p. 3). ( 33 ) Paragraph 43, particularly note 19. ( 34 ) See Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271, paragraph 68, and C-461/10 Bonnier Audio and Others [2012] ECR, paragraph ( 35 ) As to the costs incurred by the television broadcasting organization which holds the exclus......
-
Digital Rights Ireland Ltd (C-293/12) v Minister for Communications, Marine and Natural Resources and Others and Kärntner Landesregierung (C-594/12) and Others.
...I-1227); arrêts du 5 mai 2011, Deutsche Telekom (C-543/09, Rec. p. I-3441); Scarlet Extended, précité; du 19 avril 2012, Bonnier Audio e.a. (C‑461/10), et du 22 novembre 2012, Probst ( 7 ) Ci-après la «loi de 2005 sur la justice pénale». ( 8 ) Datenschutzgesetz 2000, BGBl. I, 165/1999, dans......