Criminal proceedings against Kolpinghuis Nijmegen BV.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtDue
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1987:431
Docket Number80/86
Date08 October 1987
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
EUR-Lex - 61986J0080 - EN 61986J0080

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 1987. - Criminal proceedings against Kolpinghuis Nijmegen BV. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Arrondissementsrechtbank Arnhem - Netherlands. - The possibility for a directive which has not yet been implemented to be relied upon against an individual. - Case 80/86.

European Court reports 1987 Page 03969
Swedish special edition Page 00213
Finnish special edition Page 00215


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

1 . MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE INSTITUTIONS - DIRECTIVES - DIRECT EFFECT - CONDITIONS - LIMITS - POSSIBILITY OF RELYING UPON A DIRECTIVE AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL - NONE

( EEC TREATY, ART . 189*(3 )*)

2 . MEASURES ADOPTED BY THE INSTITUTIONS - DIRECTIVES - IMPLEMENTATION BY THE MEMBER STATES - NEED TO ENSURE THAT DIRECTIVES ARE EFFECTIVE - OBLIGATIONS OF THE NATIONAL COURTS - LIMITS - PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND NON-RETROACTIVITY

( EEC TREATY, ART . 189*(3 )*)

Summary

1 . WHEREVER THE PROVISIONS OF A DIRECTIVE APPEAR, AS FAR AS THEIR SUBJECT-MATTER IS CONCERNED, TO BE UNCONDITIONAL AND SUFFICIENTLY PRECISE, THOSE PROVISIONS MAY BE RELIED UPON BY AN INDIVIDUAL AGAINST THE STATE WHERE THAT STATE FAILS TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE IN NATIONAL LAW BY THE END OF THE PERIOD PRESCRIBED OR WHERE IT FAILS TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE CORRECTLY .

HOWEVER, ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 189 OF THE EEC TREATY THE BINDING NATURE OF A DIRECTIVE, WHICH CONSTITUTES THE BASIS FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF RELYING ON THE DIRECTIVE BEFORE A NATIONAL COURT, EXISTS ONLY IN RELATION TO "EACH MEMBER STATE TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED ". IT FOLLOWS THAT A DIRECTIVE MAY NOT OF ITSELF IMPOSE OBLIGATIONS ON AN INDIVIDUAL AND THAT A PROVISION OF A DIRECTIVE MAY NOT BE RELIED UPON AS SUCH AGAINST SUCH A PERSON BEFORE A NATIONAL COURT .

2 . IN APPLYING NATIONAL LAW AND IN PARTICULAR THE PROVISIONS OF A NATIONAL LAW SPECIFICALLY INTRODUCED IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THE DIRECTIVE, NATIONAL COURTS ARE REQUIRED TO INTERPRET THEIR NATIONAL LAW IN THE LIGHT OF THE WORDING AND THE PURPOSES OF THE DIRECTIVE IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE THE RESULT REFERRED TO IN THE THIRD PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 189 OF THE TREATY .

HOWEVER, THAT OBLIGATION IS LIMITED BY THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW WHICH FORM PART OF COMMUNITY LAW AND IN PARTICULAR THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND NON-RETROACTIVITY . THEREFORE A DIRECTIVE CANNOT, OF ITSELF AND INDEPENDENTLY OF A NATIONAL LAW ADOPED BY A MEMBER STATE FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION, HAVE THE EFFECT OF DETERMINING OR AGGRAVATING THE LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL LAW OF PERSONS WHO ACT IN CONTRAVENTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DIRECTIVE .

Parties

IN CASE 80/86

REFERENCE TO THE COURT UNDER ARTICLE 177 OF THE EEC TREATY BY THE ARRONDISSEMENTSRECHTBANK ( DISTRICT COURT ), ARNHEM, FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THAT COURT AGAINST

KOLPINGHUIS NIJMEGEN BV, NIJMEGEN,

ON THE INTERPRETATION OF COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 80/777/EEC OF 15 JULY 1980 ON THE APPROXIMATION OF THE LAWS OF THE MEMBER STATES RELATING TO THE EXPLOITATION AND MARKETING OF NATURAL MINERAL WATERS ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL 1980, L*229, P.*1 ), IN PARTICULAR AS REGARDS THE EFFECTS OF THAT DIRECTIVE BEFORE IT HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN NATIONAL LAW,

THE COURT ( SIXTH CHAMBER )

COMPOSED OF : O . DUE, PRESIDENT OF CHAMBER, G . C . RODRIGUEZ IGLESIAS, T . KOOPMANS, K . BAHLMANN AND C...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 30 January 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 30 January 2025
    ...apartado 24 y jurisprudencia citada]. 42 Véase, en este sentido, la sentencia de 8 de octubre de 1987, Kolpinghuis Nijmegen (80/86, EU:C:1987:431), apartado 13. Véanse, asimismo, las sentencias de 3 de mayo de 2005, Berlusconi y otros (C‑387/02, C‑391/02 y C‑403/02, EU:C:2005:270), apartado......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 25 July 2018.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 25 July 2018
    ...57). See also, as regards the applicability of directives, judgments of 8 October 1987, Kolpinghuis NijmegenKolpinghuis Nijmegen (80/86, EU:C:1987:431, paragraph 13), and of 22 November 2005, Grøngaard and BangGrøngaard and Bang (C‑384/02, EU:C:2005:708, paragraph 71 Judgment of 8 September......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. J. Richard de la Tour, presentadas el 14 de diciembre de 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 December 2023
    ...par la directive ou de lui porter gravement atteinte. Elle cite, à cet égard, les arrêts du 8 octobre 1987, Kolpinghuis Nijmegen (80/86, EU:C:1987:431) ; du 18 décembre 1997, Inter-Environnement Wallonie (C‑129/96, EU:C:1997:628), et du 22 novembre 2005, Mangold (C‑144/04, 8 La juridiction ......
  • Gerhard Köbler v Republik Österreich.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 April 2003
    ...[2002] ECR I-6325, paragraph 24. 57 – Case C-334/92 Wagner Miret [1993] ECR I-6911, paragraph 21. 58 – Arcaro, paragraph 42, referring to Case 80/86 Kolpinghuis Nijmegen [1987] ECR 3969, paragraphs 13 and 14. 59 – Paragraph 24 in conjunction with paragraph 16. Some indications to that effec......
  • Get Started for Free