Judgment of the General Court First Chamber, Extended Composition, 26 March 2025, A2B Connect and Others v Council, T-307/22
| Date | 26 March 2025 |
| Year | 2025 |
40
Judgment of the General Cour t (First Chamber, Extended Composition), 26 March 2025,
A2B Connect and Others v Council , T-307/22
Link to the full text of the judgment
Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions
destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Temporary prohibition of broadcasting and suspension of
author isations for the broadcasting of content by certa in media outlets – Tempo ra ry p rohib it ion of
advertising for products or services in content produced or broadcast by certain media outlets –
Competence of the Council – Freedom of expression and of information – Propor tionality – Obligation to
state reasons
In its judgment, the General Court dismisses the action for annulment brought by the applicant
companies against the acts by which the Council prohibits any operator established in the European
Union, first, from broadcasting any content, and from enabling, facilitating or contributing to the
broadcasting , by the legal persons, en tities or bo dies listed in th e annexes t o the contested decisions,
of any content; and, second, from advertising products or services in content broadcast by those
persons, entit ies or bodies. 55 The present case allows the Court, inter alia, t o rule on the conditions
for recognit ion of its jurisdiction to examine the legality of decisions adopted in the context of the
common foreign and security policy (CFSP) in respect o f applican ts subject to t hose proh ibitions.
The present judgment arises in the context of a series of restrictive measures adopted by the
European Union following the military aggression launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine
on 24 F eb rua ry 2022. The applicants, who are established in the Netherlands and whose names are
not o n the lists annexed to the contested acts, are provid ers of internet serv ices to individua ls and to
businesses.
In support of their action, the applicants claim a lack of competence on the part of the Council to
adopt the contested acts and an infringement of the rights to freedom of expression and
information 56 and to good administration 57 guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union (‘the Charter’).
Findings of the Court
Examining of its own motion whether it has jurisdiction to examine the legality of the contested acts,
the Court finds, in the first place, that it is only necessary to rule on the legality of the contested
regulations. In that regard, it notes, first of all, that, in accordance with the second paragraph of
Article 275 TFEU, it is the indiv idual nature of measu res adopted on the basis o f provisions relat ing to
the CFSP which permits access to the Courts of the European Union. A decision providing for
restrictive measures may be considered to be an individual measure if the person concerned is
referred to by name in that decision. Since the applicant s’ names do not appear either in the body of
Decision2014/512, as amended, or in A nnex IX thereto, as amended, the Court finds that the
contested decisions are not restrictive measures against the applicants. The restrictive measures at
issue must, in fact , be understood as being o f general application as regards the applicants – since the
latter are among the entities belonging to the general and abstract category of ‘operators’ that are
prohibited from broadcasting content from the ‘legal persons, entities or bodies’ listed in Annex IX to
55 Council D ecision (CFSP) 2022/351 of 1 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measur es in view of Ru ssia’s
actions d estabilising th e situation in Ukr aine ( OJ 2022 L 65, p. 5), Council Regu lation (EU) 2022/350 of 1 March 2022 amen ding Regulation
(EU) No833/2014 conce rning r estrictive mea sures in v iew of Russia ’s action s destabilisin g the situat ion in Ukrain e (OJ 2022 L 65, p. 1),
Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/884 of 3 June 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s
actions d estabilisin g the sit uation in Uk raine (O J 2022 L 153, p. 128) and Coun cil Regulation (EU) 2022/879 of 3 June 2022 amendin g
Regulation (EU) N o 833/2014 concer ning r estrictiv e measures in view of R ussia’ s actions dest abilising the situ ation in Uk raine (OJ 20 22 L 153,
p. 53).
56 Article 11 of the Charter.
57 Article 41 of th e Charter.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations