Konsorcjum: ANTEA POLSKA S.A., „Pectore-Eco'' sp. z o.o., Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy v Państwowe Gospodarstwo Wodne Wody Polskie.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtLycourgos
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:888
Docket NumberC-54/21
Date17 November 2022
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Biondi delivered on 3 July 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 3 July 2025
    ...Sentenza del 4 dicembre 2003, EVN e Wienstrom (C‑448/01, EU:C:2003:651, punti 42 e 43). 51 Sentenza del 17 novembre 2022, Antea Polska e a. (C‑54/21, EU:C:2022:888, punto 52 V., in tal senso, inter alia, sentenza del 13 giugno 2024, BibMedia (C‑737/22, EU:C:2024:495, punto 30 e giurispruden......
  • Fabien Courtois e.a. contre Commission européenne.
    • European Union
    • General Court (European Union)
    • 17 July 2024
    ...commerciaux des intéressés ou nuire à la concurrence loyale (voir, en ce sens et par analogie, arrêt du 17 novembre 2022, Antea Polska e.a., C‑54/21, EU:C:2022:888, point 183 Par ailleurs, les informations figurant dans les contrats en cause ne sauraient être considérées comme étant histori......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Norkus delivered on 10 July 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 July 2025
    ...arrêts du 20 septembre 2018, Montte (C‑546/16, EU:C:2018:752, point 31 et jurisprudence citée), et du 17 novembre 2022, Antea Polska e.a. (C‑54/21, EU:C:2022:888, points 88 à 91). Voir, également, article 18, paragraphe 1, et article 67, paragraphe 4, de la directive 2014/24 ainsi que consi......