LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld and Österreichische Gesundheitskasse.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:89
Docket NumberC-219/20
Date10 February 2022

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 cases
  • Conclusiones de la Abogado General Sra. T. Ćapeta, presentadas el 7 de abril de 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 7 April 2022
    ...ajouté par mes soins. 20 Voir, en ce sens, arrêt du 10 février 2022, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (Délai de prescription) (C‑219/20, EU:C:2022:89, point 45 et jurisprudence 21 Une telle reconnaissance parallèle permet aussi d’éviter que le contrôle juridictionnel constitue in......
  • Conclusiones del Abogado General Sr. J. Richard de la Tour, presentadas el 8 de septiembre de 2022.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 8 September 2022
    ...8 Véase, en particular, la sentencia de 10 de febrero de 2022, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (Plazo de prescripción) (C‑219/20, EU:C:2022:89), apartado 33 y jurisprudencia 9 Véase, en particular, la sentencia de 10 de febrero de 2022, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfel......
  • Funke Sp. z o.o. contra Landespolizeidirektion Wien.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 17 May 2023
    ...effettiva [v., in tal senso, sentenza del 10 febbraio 2022, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (Termine di prescrizione), C‑219/20, EU:C:2022:89, punto 42 e giurisprudenza ivi citata]. 76 Orbene, atteso che la procedura di notifica RAPEX è disciplinata dal diritto dell’Unione, una ......
  • BE v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 12 January 2023
    ...que se le hayan planteado [sentencia de 10 de febrero de 2022, Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld (Plazo de prescripción), C‑219/20, EU:C:2022:89, apartado 20 y jurisprudencia 25 Además, conforme al artículo 94, letra c), del Reglamento de Procedimiento del Tribunal de Justicia, la......
  • Get Started for Free