Lombard Pénzügyi és Lízing Zrt. v PN.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtJääskinen
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2022:242
Docket NumberC-472/20
Date31 March 2022
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • MJ v AxFina Hungary Zrt.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 27 April 2023
    ...stabilisce tra dette disposizioni e la normativa nazionale applicabile alla causa principale (sentenza del 31 marzo 2022, Lombard Lízing, C‑472/20, EU:C:2022:242 , punto 27 e giurisprudenza ivi 27 Secondo la costante giurisprudenza della Corte, spetta esclusivamente al giudice nazionale, c......
  • LC v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione Internazionale di Roma – sezione procedure alla frontiera II.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 1 August 2025
    ...in diesem Sinne Urteile vom 10. April 1984, von Colson und Kamann, 14/83, EU:C:1984:153, Rn. 15, und vom 31. März 2022, Lombard Lízing, C‑472/20, EU:C:2022:242, Rn. 63 Insbesondere lässt dieser Wertungsspielraum die Pflicht des nationalen Gerichts unberührt, für die volle Wirksamkeit der An......
  • Arkadiusz Szcześniak v Bank M. SA.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 15 June 2023
    ...Klauseln zulasten des Verbrauchers rechtsgrundlos erhalten hat (vgl. in diesem Sinne Urteil vom 31. März 2022, Lombard Lízing, C‑472/20, EU:C:2022:242, Rn. 50 und 55 sowie die dort angeführte 66 Da – wie sich aus der in Rn. 58 des vorliegenden Urteils angeführten Rechtsprechung ergibt – ohn......
  • Conclusions de l'avocat général M. J. Richard de la Tour, présentées le 10 avril 2025.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 10 April 2025
    ...dei paesi di origine sicuri, detta questione avrebbe carattere ipotetico. 20 V., in tal senso, sentenza del 31 marzo 2022, Lombard Lízing (C‑472/20, EU:C:2022:242, punto 35 e giurisprudenza 21 V. sentenza CV (punto 86 e giurisprudenza citata). 22 C‑69/10, EU:C:2011:524. 23 V. punto 58 di de......
  • Get Started for Free