Observations
| Author | European Court of Auditors |
| Pages | 17-33 |
17
Observations
The Commission has ensured that the EU Cross-Border
Healthcare Directive has been put into practice
22 In order to oversee the implementation of the Directive, the Commission needs
to monitor and enforce its transposition by the Member States through completeness
and compliance checks. The Commission also has to report on the operation of the
Directive and appropriately guide the National Contact Points responsible for provision
of information to patients on cross-border healthcare.
The Commission has monitored and enforced transposition of the
Directive
23 Following the Directive’s transposition deadline of 25 October 2013 and the
Commission’s completeness checks of the transposition by the Member States, the
Commission opened 26 infringement procedures for late or incomplete notification of
transposition measures. In addition, the Commission initiated 21 infringement
procedures on late or incomplete transposition of the Implementing Directive on the
recognition of medical prescriptions issued in another Member State17. After all
Member States provided complete notifications of transposition measures, the
Commission closed these procedures by November 2017.
24 The Commission checks Member States’ legislation to establish whether they had
correctly transposed the Directive’s provisions. In order to target these checks, the
Commission identified four priority areas that act as barriers to cross-border patients:
reimbursement systems, the use of prior authorisation, administrative requirements
and the charging of incoming patients. Following these checks, the Commission
opened 11 own-initiative infringement cases, four of which had been closed by
November 2018, after Member States amended national transposition measures.
25 We consider that the Commission’s checks has led to improvements in the
systems and practices employed by the Member States.
17 Commission Implementing Directive 2012/52/EU of 20 December 2012 laying down
measures to facilitate the recognition of medical prescriptions issued in another Member
State (OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 68).
18
The Commission has reported on the operation of the Directive in a
timely manner
26 The Commission is required to draw up a report every three years, starting in
2015, on the operation of the Directive18. These reports should include information on
patient flows and the costs associated with patients’ mobility. While the Directive does
not oblige Member States to collect data on patients’ flows, it specifies that they shall
provide the Commission with assistance and all available information for preparing the
report. In 2013, Member States agreed to provide specific data to the Commission on
an annual basis.
27 The majority of Member States were late in the adoption of the national
transposition measures (see paragraph 23) and this delayed their provision of data to
the Commission in 2015. In 2017, 26 Member States provided it but for six of them,
data was incomplete. In addition, data was not comparable from one country to
another as some Member States reported all reimbursements without specifying
whether they were granted under the Directive or the Regulation on the coordination
of social security systems. The Commission recognised the limited accuracy of data
included in the reports. For example, the overview of patient flows was incomplete.
Table 1 shows that four Member States did not provide data on outgoing patient flows
in 2016.
28 Despite these challenges, the Commission met its reporting obligation on time. It
adopted its recent report in September 2018 and presented an overview of patient
flows and of the financial impact of cross-border healthcare under the Directive.
The Commission guided the National Contact Points in improving the
information on cross-border healthcare
29 The Commission supports and guides the National Contact Points with the aim of
providing clear and comprehensive information on patients’ rights to cross-border
healthcare. To do that the Commission published a number of relevant studies19. Prior
18 Article 20 of the Directive.
19 These studies include: 2012 Study on a best practice based approac h to National Contact
Point websites with recommendations to Member States and the Comm ission on how to
provide the appropriate information on various essential aspects of cross-border healthcare
through NCPs; 2014 Study on the impact of information on patients’ choice within the
context of the Directive; 2015 Evaluative study on the operation of the Directive containing
inter alia a review of NCP websites.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations