References

• Pages: 35-38

References

Benefit s of gender equality th rough infrastruct ure provision: an EU-wid e survey 35

9. References

Agudo Arroyo, Y. and Sánchez de Madariaga, I.

(2011). Construyendo un lugar en la profesión:

trayectorias de las arquitectas españolas, Femi-

nismo/s, 17, pp 155-181.

Alarcón, G., Arias, C., Colino, J. (2012). Infrae-

structuras y género [Infrastructure and gen-

der] ,. Revista de Investigaciones Feministas, 2,

151-174 .

Alarcón, G., Colino, J. (2011). La perspectiva de

género en los gastos en infraestructuras públi-

cas: los equipamientos educativos y deportivos

en el [Fondo Estatal de Inversión Local] FEIL

[The gender perspective in public infrastructure

costs: education and sport equipment in the

state budget for local investment].Presupuesto

yGasto Público, 64, pp. 155-178.

Alarcón García, G. (2015). Annex VIII, The Bene-

ts of Gender Equality by Expenditure on pub-

lic infrastrucutres. Background paper. Contrac t

EIGE/2014/OPER/32.

Alarcón García, G. (2015). La igualdad de género

como eje de un nuevo modelo económico y social

eciente y sostenible: el cometido de las políticas

públicas [Gender equality as an axeis of a new

social and economic ecient and sus tainable

model: the role of public policies]. (Available

at: http://www.inmujer.gob.es/areasTematicas/

estudios/estudioslinea2015/docs/Laigualdadde-

generoWeb.pdf ).

Alarcón García, G., Colino Sueiras, J. (2013). Infra-

structure and Gender: Right and Lef t, Mayor s

and Mayoresses,. Wulfenia, (20)11, pp. 423-461.

American Association for Public Opinion

Research (2011). Standard denitions: Final dispo-

sitions of case codes and outcome rates for sur-

veys, 7th edition. AAPOR.

Bernini, C., Guizzardi, A., Angelini G. (2013).

DEA-like model and common weights approach

for the construction of a subjective community

well-being indicator, Social Indicators Research,

114 (2), pp. 4 05-424.

Boll, A., Dumenjó, R.M., Segura, I. (1998). Las

mujeres y la ciudad [Women and the city]. Fun-

dació Maria Aur̀lia, Barcelona.

Boll Levi, A. (2012). Hacia modelos alternativos

de ciudad compatibles con una sociedad inclusiva.

Estudios urbanos, género y feminismos. Teorías

y experiencias. [Towards alternative models of

inclusive-society-compatible cities. Gender and

feminism urban studies. Theories and experi-

enc es].

Borderías, C., Carrasco, C. (1994). Las mujeres

y el trabajo: aproximaciones históricas, soci-

ológicas y económicas [Women and work, his-

torical, sociological and economic approxima-

tio ns], Las mujeres yel trabajo, rupturas concep-

tuales [ Women and work, conceptual ruptures].

Economía Critica, Barcelona.

Commission of the European Communities

(2009). GDP and beyond: Measuring progress

in a changing world [Communication from the

Commission to the Council and the European

Parliament]. Brussels. COM(2009) 433 nal.

(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriS-

erv.do?uri=COM:2009:0433:F IN:EN:PDF).

Dahlerup, D. (2007). Women, Quotas and Politics,

Routledge, New York.

DEmilione, M., Fabrizi, L., Giuliano, G., Raciti,

P., Tenaglia, S., Vivaldi, P. V. (2015). Multidimen -

sional approach to an analysis of individual dep-

rivation: The MACaD model and the results of

empirical investigation, Forum for Social Eco-

nomics, 45 (2-3), pp. 256-282.

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., White, M. (2008). Do

we really know what makes us happy? A review

of the literature on the factors associated with

subjective well-being, Journal of Economic Psy-

chology, 29,pp. 94-122.