M. A. Roks, señora de De Weerd y otros contra Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen y otros.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
Writing for the CourtSchockweiler
ECLIECLI:EU:C:1994:71
Docket NumberC-343/92
Date24 February 1994
Procedure TypeReference for a preliminary ruling
EUR-Lex - 61992J0343 - EN 61992J0343

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 February 1994. - M. A. De Weerd, née Roks, and others v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen and others. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Raad van Beroep 's-Hertogenbosch - Netherlands. - Equal treatment for men and women - Social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Effects of late transposition on rights acquired under the Directive. - Case C-343/92.

European Court reports 1994 Page I-00571


Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part

Keywords

++++

1. Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7/EEC - Article 4(1) - Direct effect - Belated national implementing measures subjecting the grant to married women of benefits for incapacity for work to a condition not previously applied to men and thereby withdrawing from women rights previously conferred by the directive - Not permissible

(Council Directive 79/7, Art. 4(1))

2. Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7 - National legislation subjecting future continuance of entitlement to benefits for incapacity for work to a condition applicable without distinction as to sex - Measure having the effect of withdrawing from women rights conferred by Article 4(1) - Permissibility

(EEC Treaty, Arts 117 and 118; Council Directive 79/7, Art. 4(1))

3. Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7 - Article 4(1) - National legislation subjecting the grant of benefits for incapacity for work to the requirement of having previously received some income - Condition applied without distinction as to sex, but principally affecting women - Not permissible without objective justification - Budgetary considerations - No justification

(Council Directive 79/7, Art. 4(1))

4. Social policy - Equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security - Directive 79/7 - Article 4(1) - Direct effect - May be relied on only by persons covered ratione personae and by those affected by discrimination in a national provision through another person so covered

(Council Directive 79/7, Arts 2 and 4(1))

Summary

1. Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 may, in the absence of appropriate implementing measures, be relied on by individuals before the national courts in order to preclude the application of any provision of national law inconsistent with that article and as from 23 December 1984, the date on which the time allowed for transposing the directive expired, women are entitled to be treated in the same manner and to have the same rules applied to them as men who are in the same situation, since, where the directive has not been implemented correctly, those rules remain the only valid point of reference.

Belatedly adopted implementing measures must fully respect the rights which Article 4(1) has conferred on individuals in a Member State as from the expiry of the period allowed to the Member States for complying therewith.

Accordingly Community law precludes the application of national legislation intended to implement Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7, adopted after expiry of the time-limit laid down in the directive, which, by making entitlement to benefits for incapacity for work dependent on a condition not previously applied to men, deprives married women of the rights conferred on them, when the time-limit for implementation had expired, by virtue of the direct effect of the directive.

2. Directive 79/7 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment between men and women in matters of social security leaves intact the powers reserved by Articles 117 and 118 of the Treaty to the Member States to define their social policy within the framework of close cooperation organized by the Commission, and consequently the nature and extent of measures of social protection, including those relating to social security, and the way in which they are implemented.

Accordingly, Community law does not preclude the introduction of national legislation which, by making continuance of entitlement to benefits for incapacity for work subject to a condition applicable henceforth to men and women alike, has the effect of withdrawing from women in future rights which they derive from the direct effect of Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7.

3. Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 precludes the application of a national measure which, although formulated in neutral terms, works to the disadvantage of far more women than men, unless that measure is based on objectively justified factors unrelated to any discrimination on grounds of sex. That is the case where the measures chosen reflect a legitimate social policy aim of the Member State whose legislation is at issue, are appropriate to achieve that aim and are necessary in order to do so.

Nevertheless, although budgetary considerations may influence a Member State' s choice of social policy and affect the nature or scope of the social protection measures it wishes to adopt, they cannot themselves constitute the aim pursued by that policy and cannot, therefore, justify discrimination against one of the sexes.

Accordingly, Article 4(1) of Directive 79/7 precludes the application of national legislation which makes the grant of benefits for incapacity for work subject to the condition of having received some income during the year preceding the commencement of the incapacity, a condition which, although it does not distinguish on grounds of sex, affects far more women than men, even if the adoption of that national legislation is justified on budgetary grounds.

4. Only persons falling within the scope ratione personae of Directive 79/7 as defined in Article 2 and those affected by discrimination in a national provision through another person who himself falls within the scope of the directive may, if that national legislation is incompatible with Article 4(1) of the directive, rely on that article before the national courts in order to prevent the application of the national legislation.

Parties

In Case C-343/92,

REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Raad van Beroep, 's-Hertogenbosch (The Netherlands), for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between

M.A. De Weerd, née Roks,

F.M. Hulshoff,

J. Steevens,

K. Tjallinks,

A.P. van Kampen,

J.T.H.J. Vrolijks, née van Es

and

Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen,

Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Detailhandel, Ambachten en Huisvrouwen,

Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging,

Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Hotel-, Restaurant-, Café-, Pension- en Aanverwante Bedrijven,

on the interpretation of Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (Official Journal 1979 L 6, page 24),

THE COURT (Sixth Chamber),

composed of: G.F. Mancini, President of the Chamber, M. Díez de Velasco, C.N. Kakouris, F.A. Schockweiler (Rapporteur) and P.J.G. Kapteyn, Judges,

Advocate General: M. Darmon,

Registrar: H.A. Ruehl, Principal Administrator,

after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:

- the Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen, by M.H. Schripsema, Director,

- the Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Detailhandel, Ambachten en Huisvrouwen, by L.E. Mollerus and M.H.J. Dijckmeester, Legal Advisers,

- the Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging, by M.C.R.J.A.M. Brent, Head of the Legal Service for Social Security Affairs of the Gemeenschappelijk Administratiekantoor,

- the Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor Hotel-, Restaurant-, Café-, Pension- en Aanverwante Bedrijven, by M.C.R.J.A.M. Brent, Head of the Legal Service for Social Security Affairs of the Gemeenschappelijk Administratiekantoor,

- the Government of the Netherlands, by J.G. Lammers, Assistant Legal Adviser at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, acting as Agent,

- the Commission of the European Communities, by Karen Banks and Ben Smulders, members of the Commission' s Legal Service, acting as Agents,

having regard to the Report for the Hearing,

after hearing the oral observations of the Bestuur van de...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
49 cases
  • Angestelltenbetriebsrat der Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse v Wiener Gebietskrankenkasse.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 January 1999
    ...declarado que consideraciones de índole presupuestaria no constituyen criterios objetivos [sentencia de 24 de febrero de 1994, Roks y otros (C-343/92, Rec. p. I-571), apartados 35 y 36]. (51) - Y dichos criterios, en todo caso, en la medida en que no son únicamente de carácter económico y q......
  • Procesos penales contra Tankstation 't Heukske vof y J. B. E. Boermans.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 16 March 1994
    ...d' octroi de licences pour les stations-service (voir le point 31 ci-après). (46) - Voir, très récemment, l' arrêt du 24 février 1994, Roks (C-343/92, non encore publié au Recueil, point 33 des motifs et point 3 du dispositif). (47) - Voir également, en matière de libre circulation des serv......
  • Regina contra Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Nicole Seymour-Smith y Laura Perez.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 14 July 1998
    ...14 and 26 respectively). (21) - See Zaera, cited in the preceding footnote, paragraph 14, and Sloman Neptun, paragraph 26. Sale also Case C-343/92 De Weerd and Others [1994] ECR I-571, paragraph 28; Case C-317/93 Nolte [1995] ECR I-4624, paragraph 33; Case C-444/93 Megner [1995] ECR I-4741,......
  • The Queen v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Cyril Richardson.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 19 October 1995
    ...y cuando estas medidas respeten el principio de igualdad de trato entre hombres y mujeres (sentencia de 24 de febrero de 1994, Roks y otros, C-343/92, Rec. p. I-571, apartados 28, 29 y 37). 25 Por último, hay que hacer constar que la discriminación de que se trata en el litigio principal no......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Annexes
    • European Union
    • Evaluation on the application of Directive 79/7/EEC on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters
    • 3 October 2019
    ...Ambachten en Huisvrouwen, ECLI:EU:C:1993:857. Case C-154/92, Remi van Cant v Rijksdienst voor pensioenen, ECLI:EU:C:1993:282. Case C-343/92, M. A. De Weerd, née Roks, and others v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen and others, ECLI......
  • La compleja protección social de los trabajadores a tiempo parcial. Los efectos explosivos e inciertos de la STJUE de 22 de noviembre de 2012 (as. «Elbal Moreno»)
    • European Union
    • Revista Española de Derecho Europeo No. 47, July 2013
    • 1 July 2013
    ...STJ de 24.2.1994, as. Roks y otros c. Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezongheid, Geesteljke en Maatschappelijke Belanger y otros (C-343/92), ap. 42. 46. Aunque sea «antes de expirar el plazo para la adaptación del Derecho interno a la Directiva», por lo que, en tales casos, los e......
  • Evidence from CJEU case law
    • European Union
    • Evaluation on the application of Directive 79/7/EEC on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters
    • 3 October 2019
    ...Jan Molenbroek v Bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank , ECLI:EU:C:1992:451. 207 Ibid, Paras 15. 208 Ibid, Paras 17, 19. 209 Case C-343/92, M . A. De Weerd, née Roks, and others v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen and others, EC......