Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich.
| Jurisdiction | European Union |
| Celex Number | 61995CJ0299 |
| ECLI | ECLI:EU:C:1997:254 |
| Date | 29 May 1997 |
| Court | Court of Justice (European Union) |
| Procedure Type | Reference for a preliminary ruling |
| Docket Number | C-299/95 |
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 May 1997. - Friedrich Kremzow v Republik Österreich. - Reference for a preliminary ruling: Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria. - Article 164 of the EC Treaty - European Convention on Human Rights - Deprivation of liberty - Right to a fair trial - Effects of a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights. - Case C-299/95.
European Court reports 1997 Page I-02629
Summary
Parties
Grounds
Decision on costs
Operative part
Community law - Principles - Fundamental rights - Observance ensured by the Court - Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights of national legislation not falling within the field of application of Community law - Review by the Court - Precluded
(EC Treaty, Arts 164 and 177)
Summary
Where national legislation is concerned with a situation which does not fall within the field of application of Community law, the Court cannot, in a reference for a preliminary ruling, give the interpretative guidance necessary for the national court to determine whether that national legislation is in conformity with the fundamental rights whose observance the Court ensures, such as those deriving in particular from the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
Accordingly, provisions of national law not designed to secure compliance with rules of Community law are concerned with a situation which does not fall within the field of application of Community law even though a term of imprisonment imposed by virtue of those provisions may impede the person concerned from exercising his right to freedom of movement, since a purely hypothetical prospect of exercising that right does not establish a sufficient connection with Community law to justify the application of Community provisions.
PartiesREFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Friedrich Kremzow
supported by
Wilfried Weh
intervener,
and
Republik Österreich,
on the interpretation of Article 164 of the EC Treaty and a number of provisions of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
THE COURT
(Fifth Chamber),
composed of: J.C. Moitinho de Almeida (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, D.A.O. Edward, J.-P. Puissochet and P. Jann, Judges,
Advocate General: A. La Pergola,
Registrar: H.A. Rühl, Principal Administrator,
after considering the written observations submitted on behalf of:
- Mr Kremzow, by Richard Soyer, Rechtsanwalt, Vienna,
- Republik Österreich, by Herbert Arzberger, Oberrat in the Public Prosecutor's Office (Finanzprokurator), acting as Agent,
- Wilfried Ludwig Weh, intervener in the main proceedings,
- the Austrian Government, by Wolf Okresek, Ministerialrat in the Bundeskanzeramt-Verfassungsdienst, acting as Agent,
- the German Government, by Ernst Röder, Ministerialrat in the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs, acting as Agent,
- the Greek Government, by Ekaterini Samoni-Rantou, Assistant Legal Adviser in the Community Legal Affairs Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and by Lydia Pnevmatikou and Georgios Karipsiadis, Specialized Researchers in that department, acting as Agents,
- the French Government, by Catherine de Salins, Deputy Director in the Legal Affairs Directorate of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Anne de Bourgoing, Chargé de Mission in that department, acting as Agents,
- the United Kingdom Government, by Lindsey Nicoll, of the Treasury Solicitor's Department, acting as Agent, and Daniel Bethlehem, Barrister,
- Commission of the European Communities, by Ulrich Wölker, of its Legal Service, acting as Agent,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing the oral observations of Mr Kremzow, Republik Österreich, Wilfried Ludwig Weh, the Austrian Government, the Greek...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Schunk GmbH and Schunk Kohlenstoff-Technik GmbH v Commission of the European Communities.
...assure le respect [avis de la Cour 2/94, du 28 mars 1996 (Rec. p. I‑1759, point 33), et arrêt de la Cour du 29 mai 1997, Kremzow, C‑299/95, Rec. p. I‑2629, point 14]. À cet effet, la Cour et le Tribunal s’inspirent des traditions constitutionnelles communes aux États membres ainsi que des i......
-
XC and Others v Generalprokuratur.
...in the European Union (see, to that effect, judgments of 18 June 1991, ERT, C‑260/89, EU:C:1991:254, paragraph 41; of 29 May 1997, Kremzow, C‑299/95, EU:C:1997:254, paragraph 14; of 12 June 2003, Schmidberger, C‑112/00, EU:C:2003:333, paragraph 73; and of 3 September 2008, Kadi and Al Barak......
-
Stichting Certificatie Kraanverhuurbedrijf (SCK) y Federatie van Nederlandse Kraanbedrijven (FNK) contra Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas.
...le respect (voir, notamment, avis de la Cour 2/94, du 28 mars 1996, Rec. p. I-1759, point 33; arrêt de la Cour du 29 mai 1997, Kremzow, C-299/95, non encore publié au Recueil, point 14). A cet effet, la Cour et le Tribunal s'inspirent des traditions constitutionnelles communes aux États mem......
-
Siemens AG Österreich and VA Tech Transmission & Distribution GmbH & Co. KEG (T-122/07), Siemens Transmission & Distribution Ltd (T-123/07) and Siemens Transmission & Distribution SA and Nuova Magrini Galileo SpA (T-124/07) v European Commission.
...de Justicia 2/94, de 28 de marzo de 1996, Rec. p. I‑1759, apartado 33, y sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de 29 de mayo de 1997, Kremzow, C‑299/95, Rec. p. I‑2629, apartado 14). A este respecto, el Tribunal de Justicia y el Tribunal General se inspiran en las tradiciones constitucionales ......
-
The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the european union and its field of application to the member states: some considerations as regards Italy
...the close relationship (and the partial 43 See Court of Justice, judgment of 29 th May 1997, Friedrich Kremzow v. Republik Osterreich, case C-299/95, ECLI:EU:C:1997:254, in Report 1997 I-2629. 44 Such statement shall be confirmed in the following case law (after the entry into force of the......
-
El difícil equilibrio entre la libre circulación de mercancías y los derechos fundamentales en materia de libertad de expresión y de reunión: la sentencia 'Schmidberger'
...n° 41 de la sentencia ERT citada en la nota anterior; y el fundamento jurídico n° 14 de la sentencia Kremzow de 29 de mayo de 1997, asunto C-299/95, RJTJ [54] Véase el fundamento jurídico n° 47 de la sentencia Schmidberger" en el que se citan: el fundamento jurídico n° 26 de la sentencia Fa......
-
Derechos fundamentales de la unión y estados miembros: ¿qué significa «aplicar» el derecho de la unión?
...de Justicia proporcione los elementos de interpretación, § 16); 1 de febrero de 1996, Asunto C-177/94, (§ 20); 29 de mayo de 1997, Asunto C-299/95 (§ 15); 26 de junio de 1997, Asunto C-368/95 (§ 24); 18 de diciembre de 1997, Asunto C-309/96 (§ 13); 19 de noviembre de 1998, Asunto C-85/97 (§......
-
Por una Europa de los Derechos Humanos: la adhesión de la Unión Europea al Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos.
...C-260/89, Rep. 91, p. I-2925, cons. 41. 16 Cons. 33. 17 As. C-260/89, sent. de 18-junio-1991, cons. 41. 18 Cons. 33, antes citado. 19 As. C-299/95, sent. de 29-mayo-1997, Rep. 97, pp. I-2629 y ss., cons. 20 As. C-309/96, Rep. 97, p. I-7509, cons. 12. 21 Artículo cit., p. 370. 22 Sent. de 16......