Summary of the first phase of the study: conceptual definition, state of play and gaps analysis
Author | Carbonar, Giulia; Sterling, Raymond; Spirinckx, Carolin; Vandevelde, Birgit; De Groote, Maarten; Dourlens-Quaranta, Sophie; Lodigiani, Alessandro; Volt, Jonathan; Borragán, Guillermo; Glicker, Jessica; Kondratenko, Irena; Toth, Zsolt; Rajagopalan, Neethi; De Regel, Sofie; Rapf, Oliver; Calderoni, Marco; Loureiro, Tatiana |
Pages | 27-27 |
STUDY ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF A EUROPEAN UNION FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL BUILDING LOGBOOKS
FINAL REPORT
27
PART I. SUMMARY OF THE FIRST
PHASE OF THE STUDY:
CONCEPTUAL DEFINITION, STATE
OF PLAY AND GAPS ANALYSIS
During the first phase of the study, the following activities were carried out:
• [Task 5] Comprehensive stakeholder consultation activities were undertaken since
the beginning of the study. During the first phase of the study, 32 stakeholders have
been interviewed one by one; an online survey was run, to which 93 stakeholders
have responded; a webinar with 68 participants was organised; a stakeholder
meeting with 66 participants was been organised.
• [Task 1] Based on desk research and the above-mentioned stakeholder
consultations, a comprehensive conceptual definition of the Digital Building Logbook
was developed. A specific report was dedicated on this: Report 1 – Definition of the
Digital Building Logbook [1]
• [Task 2] In parallel with Task 1, 40 building logbook initiatives have been analysed,
according to a predefined template in line with the questions raised in the online
survey and in the interviews. This was the topic of a specific report: Report 2 –
Building Logbook State of Play [2].
• [Task 3] Then, following the outcomes of Tasks 5, 1 and 2, the main gaps that still
have to be addressed to ensure a widespread use and efficient functioning of Digital
Building Logbooks have been identified, and actions to address those gaps have been
proposed. This work had been anticipated by including relevant questions in the
interviews and the survey.
• [Task 4] Finally, a methodology was prepared to identify the 3 to 4 priority actions
that the European Commission could carry out or support. This identification has also
been supported by the above-mentioned stakeholder meeting.
To continue reading
Request your trial