Table of cases
| Author | Dr. Klaus-Dieter Borchardt |
| Pages | 105-110 |
Page 105
Case 26/62 Van Gend & Loos (1963) ECR 1 (nature of Community law; rights and obligations of individuals).
Case 6/64 Costa/ENEL (1964) ECR 1251 (nature of Community law; direct applicability; primacy of Community law).
Case 14/68 Walt Wilhelm and others (1969) ECR 1 (nature of Community law; primacy of Community law).
Case 106/77 Simmenthal (1978) ECR 629 (Community law; direct applicability, primacy).
Case 826/79 Mireco (1980) ECR 2559 (primacy of Community law).
Case C-213/89 Factortame (1990) ECR I- 2466 (direct applicability; primacy of Community law).
Joined Cases C-6 Francovich and 9/90 Bonifaci (1991) ECR I-5403 (effect of Community law; liability of Member States for failure to discharge Community obligations; non-transposal of directives).
Case C-13 and 113/91 Debus (1992) ECR I-3636 (conflict between Community and national law; direct applicability and primacy of Community law).
Case C-393/92 Gemeente Almelo (1994) ECR I-1477 (primacy and uniform application of Community law).
Joined Cases C-46/93 Brasserie du pÍcheur and C-48/93 Factortame (1996) ECR I-1029 (effect of Community law; general liability of Member States for failure to discharge Community obligations).
Joined Cases C-10 and 22/97 IN.CO.GE "90 Srl. (1998) ECR I-6307 (primacy of Community law).
Case C-212/97 Centros Ltd. (1999) ECR I- 1459 (national measures for preventing abuse of Community law).
Case 8/55 FÈdÈchar (1955-56) ECR 291 (implied powers; official fixing of prices).
Case 22/70 AETR (1971) ECR 263 (legal personality and treaty-making powers of the Community).
Case 6/76 Kramer (1976) ECR 1279 (external relations; international commitments; authority of the Community).
Opinion 1/76 (1977) ECR 759 ff. (external relations; international commitments; authority of the Community).
Page 106
Opinion 1/78 (1979) ECR 2871 (division of powers between the Community and the Member States).
Cases 51, 90 and 94/89 United Kingdom and others v Council (1991) ECR I-2786 (subsidiarity; scope of principle).
Opinion 2/91 (1993) ECR I-1061 (distribu tion of powers between the Community and the Member States).
Opinion 1/91 (1993) ECR I-6079 (EEA Agreement I; distribution of powers).
Opinion 1/94 (1994) ECR I-5267 (WTO Agreement; distribution of powers).
Opinion 2/94 (1996) ECR I-1759 (acces sion by the EC to the ECHR; absence of powers).
Case 22/96 - Parliament v Council (1998) ECR I-3231
Case 43/71 Politi (1971) ECR 1039 (regulations; direct effects).
Case 65/75 Tasca (1976) ECR 291 (regulations; direct effects).
Case 31/78 Bussone (1978) ECR 2429 (regulations; direct effects).
Case 2/74 Reyners (1974) ECR 631 (direct applicability; freedom of establishment).
Case 11/77 Hugh Patrick (1977) ECR 1199 (direct applicability; right of establishment).
Case 33/74 van Binsbergen (1974) ECR 1299 (direct applicability; freedom to provide services).
Case 41/74 van Duyn (1974) ECR 1337 (direct applicability; freedom of movement).
Case 9/70 Grad (1970) ECR 825 (decisions; direct applicability).
Case 33/70 SACE (1970) ECR 1213 (directives; direct applicability).
Case 148/78 Ratti (1979) ECR 1629 (directives; direct applicability).
Case 70/83 Kloppenburg (1984) ECR 1075 (directives; direct applicability).
Case 152/84 Marshall (1986) ECR 723 (directives; direct applicability).
Case 103/88 Costanzo (1989) ECR 1861 (directives; direct applicability; conditions; consequences).
Case 322/88 Grimaldi (1989) ECR 4416 (recommendations; direct effect or its absence; observance by national courts).
Case 188/89 Forster (1990) ECR I-3343 (directives; horizontal direct effect).
Case 221/88 Busseni (1990) ECR I-519 (ECSC recommendations/directives; vertical direct effect).
Page 107
Case 292/89 Antonissen (1991) ECR I-773 (statements in Council minutes; status for interpretation purposes).
Case 156/91 Hansa Fleisch (1992) ECR I- 5567 (decisions; direct applicability; conditions).
Case 91/92 Faccini Dori (1994) ECR I- 3325 (directives; horizontal direct effect).
Case 465/93 Atlanta Fruchthandelsge sellschaft (1995) ECR I-3761 (validity of a regulation; preliminary ruling; ordering of interim measures; conditions).
Case 469/93 Chiquita Italia (1995) ECR I- 4533 (direct effect of provisions of the GATT and the LomÈ Convention).
Case 368/96 Generics Ltd. (1998) ECR I- 7967 (statements in minutes; status for interpretation purposes).
Case 29/69 Stauder (1969) ECR 419 (fundamental rights; general principles of law).
Case 11/70 Internationale Handelsge sellschaft (1970) ECR 1125 (fundamental rights; general principles of law).
Cases 166/73, 146/73 Rheinm¸hlen I, II (1974) ECR 33 and 139 (extent to which national courts are bound by rulings of superior courts).
Case 4/73 Nold (1974) ECR 491 (funda- mental rights; general principles of law; common constitutional traditions).
Case 36/75 Rutili (1975) ECR 1219 (equal treatment; reference to the ECHR).
Case 175/73 Amalgamated European Public Service Union (1974) ECR 917 (freedom to form associations).
Case 130/75 Prais (1976) ECR 1589 (freedom of religion).
Case 117/76 Quellmehl (1977) ECR 1753 (principle of equality).
Case 149/77 Defrenne (1978) ECR 1381 (fundamental rights; general principles of law).
Case 44/79 Hauer (1979) ECR 3727 (fundamental rights; right to property).
Case 85/79 Hoffmann-La Roche (1979) ECR 461 (fundamental rights; principle of the right to be heard).
Joined Cases 154, 205, 206, 227-228, 263 and 264/78 Valsabbia (1980) ECR 1010 (fundamental rights; right of property).
Case 293/83 Gravier (1985) ECR 593 (equal treatment; students" registration fee).
Case 234/85 Keller (1986) ECR 2897 (freedom to pursue a trade or profession).
Page 108
Case 12/86 Demirel (1987) ECR 3719 (fundamental rights; Convention on Human Rights).
Joined Cases 46/87 and 227/88 Hoechst (1989) ECR 2919 (fundamental rights; principle of the right to be heard; adminis trative procedure; inviolability of the home; reference to the ECHR).
Case 374/87 Orkem (1989) ECR 3343 (fundamental rights; principle of the right to be heard; investigation procedure).
Case 265/87 Schr‰der (1989) ECR 2263 (rights of ownership; freedom to pursue a trade or profession; restrictions).
Case 100/88 Oyowe and Traore (1989) ECR 4304 (fundamental rights; freedom of expression).
Case 5/88 Wachauf (1989) ECR 2633 (restrictions on fundamental rights).
Case 62/90 Commission v Germany (1992) ECR I-2575 (fundamental rights; observance by Member States; restrictions in the public interest).
Case 219/91 Ter voort (1992) ECR I-5485 (freedom of expression).
Case 97/91 Borelli (1992) ECR I-6313 (fundamental rights; right to take action in the courts).
Case 357/89 Raulin (1992) ECR I-1027 (equal treatment; prohibition of discrimination on grounds of nationality).
Case 132/91 Katsikas (1992) ECR I-6577 (fundamental rights; freedom to pursue a trade or profession).
Case 2/92 Bostock (1994) ECR I-955 (fundamental freedoms; right of owner ship; freedom to pursue a trade or profession; observance when implementing Community rules).
Case 280/93 Germany v Council (1994) ECR I-5065 (rights of ownership; freedom to pursue a trade or profession; restrictions in the public interest).
Case 415/93 Bosman (1995) ECR I-4921 (fundamental rights; freedom to pursue a trade or profession).
Case 55/94 Gebhard (1995) ECR I-4165 (fundamental rights; right of establishment; freedom to pursue a trade or profession).
Opinion 2/94 (1996) ECR I-1759 (fundamental rights; accession by the EC to the ECHR).
Case T-105/95 WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature) v Commission (1997) ECR II- 313 (basic procedural rights; public access to Council and Commission documents).
Cases 248 and 249/95 SAM Schiffahrt und Stapf (1997) ECR I-4475 (protection of property rights and their substance).
Case T-42/96 Eyckeler & Malt AG v Commission ("Hilton Beef") (1998) ECR II- 401 (basic procedural rights; right to be heard).
Page 109
Cases 18 and 35/65 Gutmann (1966) ECR 103, 149 ff.
Case 78/74 Deuka (1975) ECR 421.
Case 98/78 Racke (1979) ECR 69.
Case 96/78 Decker (1979) ECR 101.
Case 265/78 Ferwerda (1980) ECR 617.
Case 61/79 Denkavit (1980) ECR 1205.
Cases 66, 127 and 128/79 Salumi (1980) ECR 1237.
Case 826/79 Mireco (1980) ECR 2559.
Case 70/83 Kloppenburg (1984) ECR 1075.
Case 322/93 P Peugeot (1994) ECR I- 2727.
Case 137/95 Richardson (1995) ECR I- 3407.
Cases T-551/93, T-231-234/94 Industrias Pesqueras Campos and others (1996) ECR II-247.
Case 116/76 Granaria (1977) ECR 1247.
Case 8/77 Sagulo (1977) ECR 1495.
Case 122/78 Buitoni (1979) ECR 677.
Case 154/78 Valsabbia (1980) ECR 907.
Case 808/79 Pardini (1980) ECR 2103.
Case 125/83 Corman (1985) ECR 3039.
Case 265/87 Schr‰der (1989) ECR 2263.
Case 331/88 Fedesa (1990) ECR I-4057.
Case 87/92 Hoche (1993) ECR I-4623.
Case T-480/93 Antillean Rice Mills (1995) ECR II-2305.
Case T-162/94 NMB and others (1996) ECR II-427.
Case 233/94 Germany v Council and Parliament (1997) ECR I-2405.
Case 161/96 S¸dzucker (1998) ECR I-281.
Case 74/74 CNTA (1975) ECR 533.
Cases 205-215/82 Deutsche Milchkontor (1983) ECR 2633.
Case 120/86 Mulder (1988) ECR 2344.
Case 170/86 von Deetzen (1988) ECR 2368.
Case 350/88 Delacre (1990) ECR I-418.
Case 152/88 Sofrimport (1990) ECR I- 2477.
Case 368/89 Crispoltoni I (1991) ECR I- 3715.
Page 110
Cases 31-44/91 Lageder (1993) ECR I- 1761.
Case T-82/91 Latham (1994) ECR II-61.
Case T-472/93 Campo Ebro (1995) ECR II- 421.
Case 22/94 Irish Farmer Association (1997) ECR I-1808.
Case T-119/95 Hauer (1998) ECR II-2713.
Case T-29/92 SPO (1995) ECR II-289.
Case 84/94 United Kingdom v Council (1996) ECR I-5755.
Cases 36 and 37/97 Kellinhusen and Ketelsen (1998) ECR I-6337.
