The Emergence of Heterotopia as a Heuristic Concept to Study Organization

Published date01 September 2016
AuthorPhilippe Naccache,Yoann Bazin
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12082
Date01 September 2016
The Emergence of Heterotopia as a Heuristic
Concept to Study Organization
YOANN BAZIN
1
and PHILIPPE NACCACHE
2
1
ISTEC, Paris, France
2
University of Toulouse, Toulouse BusinessSchool, France
Ever since Michel Foucault shared a number of intuitions on other spacesat a conference in 1967, a growing
number of studiesin social sciences have been focusing on what he then called heterotopias. Over the past 10years,
organization scholars have started to use the concept in their analysis, from leadership and marketing to queer
practices and critical management studies (CMS). This article presents the origin and diffusion of the concept of
heterotopia in management, using social movements as an illustration of its heuristic potential. We conclude by
presenting two promising future avenues of research in our field: heterotopic entrepreneurship and organizational
heterotopology.
Keywords: heterotopia; foucault; social movements; global cities
Introduction
Ever since Michel Foucault shared a number of intuitions
on other spacesat a conference in 1967, a growing
number of studies in social sciences have been focusing
on what he then called heterotopias.
1
He defines them as
places which are something like counter-sites []
absolutely different from all the sites that they reflect
and speak about(Foucault, 1986: 24). His call for a
science calledheterotopology has been partiallyanswered
through dozens of articles and books in disciplines as
diverse as architecture, geography, and urban studies
(Defert, 1997; Bonazzi, 2002; Dehaene and De Cauter,
2008; Fontana-Giusti, 2013; Johnson, 2013), as well as
political science, philosophy, anthropology, and
sociology (Kahn, 1995; Schinkel, 2009; Wagenaar et al.,
2012; Garrett, 2012; Marlin-Bennett and Thornton,
2012). More recently, management and organization
scholars have started to contribute to this already
flourishing area of research (Hjorth, 2005; Spicer et al.,
2009; Steyaert, 2010). In our field, however, heterotopia
remains an emerging notion that is still in need of strong
conceptual foundations. This is in part because the idea
of heterotopia is often used as a metaphor, rather than as
an actual theoretical framework. Nevertheless, heterotopia
has allowed organizational scholarsto shed new light on a
wide array of spatial dynamics, such as resistance,
deviance, contestation, entrepreneurship, creativity,
playfulness,and innovation. As Foucault originallynoted,
heterotopiashave always existed and they are not new per
se; but taken as a concept, heterotopia allows scholars to
understand phenomena that had not necessarily been
coupled before, thus providing a framework to connect
and integrate them. The aim of this paper is therefore not
to add a further definition or an application, but rather to
account for this early emergence of heterotopia as a
heuristic concept to study organizations.
In the following section, we expose what Michel
Foucault meantregarding these other spacesand explore
how organization scholars have placed the concept more
or less at the centre of their studies. Then, in order to
clarify the concept and illustrate its heuristic power, we
show how it can be used to understand recent tactics used
by social movement organizations (SMOs) in modern
globalized capitalism. Finally, we present two promising
future avenues of research: heterotopic entrepreneurship
and organizational heterotopology.
Heterotopia, an emerging notion searching
for conceptual foundations
Michel Foucault firstpresented the concept of heterotopia
in a conference he gave in 1967 at the Cercle détudes
architecturales, published in the now famous text Des
Correspondence: Yoann Bazin, ISTEC, 128 Quai de Jemmapes, 75010
Paris, France.E-mail: y.bazin@istec.fr
1
Foucault (1986)builds on the idea of utopia a placeless placeto create the
word heterotopias,which would describe otherspaces.
European Management Review, Vol. 13, 225233, (2016)
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12082
© 2016 European Academy of Management

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT