The Forced Migration Crisis and the Role of European Corporations: A Point of View

Date01 December 2018
AuthorAkram Al Ariss,Philippe Naccache
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12157
Published date01 December 2018
The Forced Migration Crisis and the Role of
European Corporations: A Point of View
PHILIPPE NACCACHE
1
and AKRAM ALARISS
2
1
INSEEC Business School, Claude, Vellefaux, Paris
2
Toulouse Business School, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
In this articlewe consider the role of Europeancorporations in dealingwith the forced migrationcrisis that Europe
is currently witnessing. From the case of the immediate refugee crisis in Europe, we move our focus toward the
longer-term aspects of forced migrations. Demonstrating the multifaceted nature of the forced migration
phenomenon, we first problematize the irresponsible behaviours of corporations and the effect of such behaviours
on the environment and affected populations. Second, we suggest that corporations should favour an inclusive
economy that facilitates the integrationof forced migrants, materialized within the workplacein the form of inclusive
people management practices. We conclude our point of view by proposing that reverting to the social context is an
absolute necessity in order fororganizations to effectively address the issue of forced migrations. We finally suggest
strong actions that could support the revival of the social role of corporations.
Keywords: Corporate social responsibility; deregulation; forced migration; refugee crisis; international migration;
responsible corporate behaviours; society of organization
We must have the courage for deregulation in the way
that so far we know from the United States ()Ifthe
threshold for entry into the labour market is too high,
the integration of immigrants in society will fail ()
It is better to enter the labour market with mini-jobs or
low-paid jobs than not at all and to be condemned to
social security, doing nothing and frustration. Tom
Enders, Airbus CEO (Chambers, 2015)
Introduction
Over the last few months the refugee crisis has put
European (Union) principles to the test. Everywhere in
Europe, confronted with the most impressive influxes of
forced migrants since the end of the Second World War
according to the International Organisation for
Migration (IOM, 2015) more than one million refugees
joined Europe in 2015 political tensions have been
revived including blatant xenophobia and religious
disputes. Somecountries such as Hungary decided to defy
European Union rules by building a fence to stop the
migrant flows. The refugee crisis was also a hot issue
during campaigning for the EU referendum in the UK,
which led to detrimental influence in the polls and
highlighted the fragility of the EU. Some countries of
refuge such as Sweden are now shifting their formerly
lenient policies (Traub, 2016). We consider this situation
is a political and moral test for European countries and
also for their corporations. This test is particularly crucial
because the forced migration issue does not only concern
the present situation in the Middle East (or indeed in a
number of areas across Africa and South Asia). Indeed,
forced migration is and is predicted to grow as a massive
phenomenon during the coming century as a result of a
mixture between environmental scarcity and
demographic, political, and social issues (Hugo, 1996;
Homer-Dixon, 1999; Castles, 2002; Bilak et al., 2016).
In this context,we argue that business corporationswill
have an important role to play. We argue that Enders
stance (as per the quoteabove) is harmful both to migrants
and to Europeansocieties. Indeed, his call for deregulation
would excludeand leave more and more groups of people
in our continent in precarious circumstances, and
ultimately and paradoxically would continue to
downplay the role of organizations, and mainly
corporations,as the cornerstones of our societies (Perrow,
1991). On the contrary, our stance is that corporations
should be the mai nspring of the development of inclu sive
societies. According t o the World Bank (2013: p xxvi),
inclusion is definedas the process of improvingthe terms
for individuals and groups to take part in society.In
others words, we argue that corporations should foster
Correspondence: Philippe Naccache, INSEEC Business School, 27
Avenue,Claude, Vellefaux75010, Paris, Tel: (0033)561 29 49 49. E-mail:
pnaccache@inseec.com
European Management Review, Vol. 15, 589596, (2018)
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12157
©2017 European Academy of Management

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT