Time‐varying Integration in European Government Bond Markets

AuthorMarta Gómez‐Puig,Pilar Abad,Helena Chuliá
Published date01 March 2014
Date01 March 2014
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00633.x
European Financial Management, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2014, 270–290
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00633.x
Time-varying Integration in European
Government Bond Markets
Pilar Abad
Economic Analysis Department, University Rey Juan Carlos and RFA-IREA, Madrid, 28032, Spain
E-mail: pilar.abad@urjc.es
Helena Chuli´
a
Department of Econometrics, University of Barcelona and RFA-IREA, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
E-mail: hchulia@ub.edu
Marta G´
omez-Puig
Department of Economic Theory, University of Barcelona and RFA-IREA, Barcelona, 08034, Spain
E-mail: marta.gomezpuig@ub.edu
Abstract
Bond market integration clearly changes in response to economic and financial
conditions, since the level of risk aversion changes and investors require time-
varying compensation for accepting a risky payoff from financial assets. In
this paper we examine the dynamic behaviour of European Government bond
market integration using an asset pricing model based on that of Bekaert
and Harvey (1995). Our sample period begins in 2004, after a period of calm
and tranquillity, and ends in 2009, with a significant widening of sovereign bond
spreads. Our results show evidence of time-varying level of integration for all
European countries and suggest that, from the beginning of the f inancial market
tensions in August 2007, markets moved towards higher segmentation, and the
differentiation of country risk factors increased substantially across countries.
However, the impact of the financial and economic crisis has been much more
harmful for EMU members’ sovereign bond markets, since it has prompted an
important backward step in their integration process.
Keywords: Monetary Union, sovereign securities markets, bond market integration
JEL classification: E44, F36, G15
The authors thank the editor, an anonymous referee, and participants at the XII Conference
on International Economics, the 2011 EFMA Annual Meetings and the 26th Congress of
the European Economic Association for helpful comments and suggestions. All errors and
omissions are our own. Pilar Abad and Helena Chuli´
a acknowledge financial support from
Fundaci´
on Ramon Areces. This paper is based upon work supported by the Government of
Spain and FEDER under grants number ECO2010-21787-C03-01, ECO2008-02752/ECON
and ECO2009-14457-C04-04. A version of this paper has been previously published as a
working paper n611/2011 in the Working Paper Series of Fundaci ´
on de las Cajas de Ahorros
(FUNCAS).
C
2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Time-varying Integration in European Government Bond Markets 271
1. Introduction
Since the introduction of the single currency, euro area monetary policy authorities have
had a keen interest in the integration and efficient functioning of the financial system
in Europe, especially in European and Monetary Union (EMU) countries.1Indeed,
financial integration is of key importance for the application of the single monetary
policy and for financial stability, and improves access to financial markets. However, it
is worth noting that a high degree of financial integration may decrease the opportunity
for risk diversification and raise the likelihood of spillover effects and contagion, as the
sovereign debt crisis in the eurozone has revealed.
In this paper, wewill continue the analysis presented in Abad et al. (2010, ACGP 2010
hereafter) and focus our attention on bond market integration in the European Union
(EU). The main objective of our previous paper was to study whether the introduction
of the euro had had an impact on the degree of integration of EU-15 government bond
markets. Since the extent to which integration has progressed in the EU bond market can
be assessed by measuring the relative importance of country components versus other
factors in explaining bond returns, we applied a CAPM based model and separated each
individual country’s government bond return into two effects: a local (own country),
and a systemic effect (either a regional/eurozone or a global/world effect). It is intuitive
that as integration advances, the proportion of the total return explained by local effects
should decrease. Our results presented evidence that during the first ten years after its
introduction, the euro had a major impact on the degree of integration of European
government bond markets. The main conclusions of our analysis were, on the one hand,
that markets of countries which shared a monetary policy were less vulnerable to the
influences of world risk factors and more vulnerable to EMU risk factors and, on the
other, that eurozone markets were only partially integrated with the Ger man market.
The proportion of the total return explained by country effects was still important and
investors were able to benefit from portfolio risk diversification.
An important restriction of the ACGP (2010) analysis was that, for each country,
we estimated ‘the average level’ of integration with the US and the Ger man bond
markets during the ten year period (1999–2008) and disregarded the fact that bond
market integration changes over time. Nevertheless, the financial market tensions that
started in August 2007 and were followed by a global financial and economic crisis led
to significantly rising yield spreads in European government bond markets along with
increased differentiation of country risk across the eurozone. This situation highlighted
the fact that bond market integration clearly changes in response to economic and
financial conditions, since the level of risk aversion changes and investors require
time-varying compensation for accepting a risky payoff from financial assets. For this
reason, some studies have allowed integration to vary over time and with events (see
Bekaert and Harvey, 1995, or Hardouvelis et al., 2006 among them).
This paper aims to address this question and to provide empirical evidence on
the ‘dynamic nature of bond market integration’ among EU-152(euro and non-euro
participants) and three economies from the central and eastern European (CEE) group
1Allen and Song (2005) investigatethe effect of European Monetary Union on the integ ration
of the financial services industry within Europe and f ind evidence that EMU has helped
financial integration within the euro area.
2With the exception of Luxembourg, due to the fact that its debt market is negligible.
C
2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT