What Do We Talk About When We Talk About Euroscepticism? Relaunching the Conceptual Debate About a Contested Term

Published date01 December 2025
AuthorPatrick Bijsmans,Luca Mancin
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cep4.70026
SectionResearch Article
Contemporary European Politics
RESEARCH ARTICLE
What Do We Talk About When We Talk About
Euroscepticism? Relaunching the Conceptual Debate
About a Contested Term
Patrick Bijsmans
1
| Luca Mancin
2
1
Department of Political Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands |
2
Graduate School on Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan,
Milan, Italy
Correspondence: Patrick Bijsmans (patrick.bijsmans@maastrichtuniversity.nl)
Received: 3 October 2024 | Revised: 4 November 2025 | Accepted: 7 November 2025
Funding: This paper has partly been made possible by a small teaching buyout funded through the Additional Research Time (ART) research incentive of
Maastricht University's Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences. Luca Mancin initially contributed to the research as part of his research internship in the MSc in
European Studies at Maastricht University.
Keywords: conceptualisation | European integration | euroscepticism | research agenda
ABSTRACT
Euroscepticism has become a mainstream phenomenon in European politics since the concept's first appearance in The Times
of 11 November 1985. The postMaastricht Treaty period was an important initial turning point, but Euroscepticism became
especially visible during the crises that hit the European Union more recently. Along the way, Euroscepticismhas become a
catchall label referring to a broad range of positions. Our work engages with the resulting conceptual confusion. Since Taggart's
famous 1998 article on the concept, Euroscepticismhas been examined from different perspectives. However, despite initial
conceptual discussions following the publication of Taggart's article, conceptual work on Euroscepticism has become rare. Our
paper presents an argumentation for relaunching this conceptual debate. We introduce our idea of conceptas a theoretical
problem deriving from the necessity to face an unknown, blurred entity, and make a case for treating Euroscepticism as a
sensitising concept. To illustrate our argument, we discuss a historical timeline to show that Euroscepticism cannot be
disconnected from the history of the European project. We also present three generations of Euroscepticism research and how
they deal with the phenomenon. We conclude with suggestions for new conceptual endeavours in the study of Euroscepticism.
1 | Introduction
In recent decades Euroscepticism has moved from the mar-
gins to the mainstream of political debate (Brack and
Startin 2015). The concept Euroscepticismmade its first
appearance in The Times of 11 November 1985, in a reference
to British antimar keters; those membe rs of the Conservativ e
Party concerned about the direction of European integration.
Yet, the real turnin g point was the Maastri cht Treaty, with its
extension of the European Union's (EU) scope and involve-
ment in a wide array of policy fields (Brack and Startin 2015;
Usherwood and Startin 2013). Henceforth, criticism towards
the EU became an integral part of public debates. Today
Euroscepticismis an umbrella term for a broad range of
different positions, ranging from criticism towards certain EU
policies to outright opposition to European integration in any
form. This is also vis ible in the academic de bate. For instance,
in the introduction to their volume on Euroscepticism,
Harmsen and Spiering (2004, 20) refer to a plurality of usages
employed by contributing authors, based on the appropriate
definition and scop e of the term as it relates to th eir particular
subject area.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialNoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work
is properly cited, the use is noncommercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
© 2025 The Author(s). Contemporary European Politics published by University Association of Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
1of10Contemporary European Politics, 2025; 3:e70026
https://doi.org/10.1002/cep4.70026

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex