Notices for publication in the OJ nº T-612/19 of Tribunal General de la Unión Europea, November 08, 2019

• Resolution Date: November 08, 2019
• Issuing Organization: Tribunal General de la Unión Europea
• Decision Number: T-612/19

Action brought on 10 September 2019 - UPL Europe and Aceto Agricultural Chemical v Commission

(Case T-612/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: UPL Europe Ltd (Warrington Cheshire, United Kingdom) and Aceto Agricultural Chemical Corp. Ltd (Port Washington, United States) (represented by: C. Mereu and P. Sellar, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/989 of 17 June 2019; ¹

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted further to manifest errors of assessment.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation results from a procedure during which the applicants’ rights of defence have not been respected.

Third plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the principle of proportionality.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested Regulation was adopted in breach of the precautionary principle.

____________

[1] Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/989 of 17 June 2019 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance chlorpropham...