Notices for publication in the OJ nº T-308/19 of Tribunal General de la Unión Europea, June 21, 2019

• Resolution Date: June 21, 2019
• Issuing Organization: Tribunal General de la Unión Europea
• Decision Number: T-308/19

Action brought on 17 May 2019 - BU v Commission

(Case T-308/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: BU (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

annul the decision of 11 January 2019 by which the Commission decided to create a new medical committee to give a new opinion on the requested recognition of aggravation of the applicant’s occupational disease;

order that the decision on the requested recognition of aggravation must be taken on the basis of the opinion already expressed by the previous medical committee on 8 January 2014, derogating from Article 12 of the Rules on the insurance of officials of the European Communities against the risk of accident and of occupational disease, in force prior to 1 January 2006 (‘the Rules’), as recognised by amended mandate of 11 January 2019, for the purposes of ordering the Commission to pay EUR 639 4[2]1.37 (of which EUR 98 372.51 has already been paid) on the basis of the allowance provided for in Article 14 of the Rules, or the provision establishing an identical or similar obligation;

order the Commission to pay EUR 5 000 for each month of delay in adopting the measure;

order the Commission to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 100 000 for unlawfully issuing Mandate No 3 of 25 January 2018, contrary to the judgments in Cases T-551/16 and T-212/01;

order the Commission to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 50 000 for disapplication of the fee scale for doctors who have been or will be appointed;

order the Commission to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 100 000 for the unjustifiable delay in completing the administrative stage of the proceedings;

order the Commission to pay compensation in the amount of EUR 1 000 000 for the disgraceful behaviour of Dr AB, a non-independent direct employee of the appointing authority, in relation to his questionable conduct as described in the application;

lastly, order the Commission to pay the...