Armed conflicts and the environment: The International Law Commission’s new draft principles

DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12324
Published date01 April 2020
AuthorMarja Lehto
Date01 April 2020
RECIEL. 2020;29:67–75.
|
  67wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/reel
1 | INTRODUCTION
In 2013, the Internat ional Law Commission (I LC) of the United
Nations (UN) incl uded a topic entitled ‘P rotection of the envi-
ronment in relati on to armed conflicts’ in its age nda.1 The work
on the topic, und er two successive Special Ra pporteurs,2 ha s by
now produced fi ve reports and altog ether 28 draft princi ples
with commenta ries that the Commission a dopted in first readi ng
in its 2019 session. 3 This is an appropriate moment to l ook back
and try to give an ove rview of what the Commission h as accom-
plished so far, the cho ices it has made and some of t he chal-
lenges that have been encountered. Rather than presenting the
draft princi ples in a systematic manner – a n exercise that would
be tantamou nt to writing a new set of commentar ies – this arti-
cle discusses fo ur general aspect s that characterize t he topic.
These defining features are the temporal approach, the interplay
of several areas of int ernational law, the relian ce on the en-
hanced unders tanding of the enviro nmental impact s of armed
conflicts an d, finally, the normative n ature of the draft
principles.
2 | TEMPORAL APPROACH
According to its St atute, the ILC shall consider p roposals submitted
to it by the UN General Assembly,4 other principal organs of the
UN, specialize d agencies or official bodie s established by intergov-
ernmental agreement.5 While these st atutory provisions may have
had less impor tance in practice tha n originally expecte d, it is worth
mentioning that the few times the UN General Assembly has asked
the Commission to p roduce a particula r outcome, its reque st has
been honoure d with quick action.6 It is i n this regard of importa nce
that the presen t topic was proposed to the I LC by the UN
Environment Prog ramme (UNEP), in a repor t of the Nairobi
1ILC ‘Yearbook of t he Internatio nal Law Commiss ion, Vol II, Part Two’ UN D oc A/CN.4/
SER.A/2 013/Add.1 (Part 2) (2013) p aras 130–144.
2Ms Marie G. Jac obsson from 2013 to 2 016, and Ms Marja Le hto from 2017.
3ILC ‘Report o f the Internatio nal Law Commis sion, Seventy-f irst Session’ U N Doc
A/74/10 (2019) (ILC 71st Sess ion Report) 20 8–296.
4Statute of the I nternational L aw Commission , adopted by UNG A ‘Elements of a n
Internatio nal Law Commiss ion’ UN Doc A/RE S/174(II) (21 November 1947), am ended in
1955 and 1981 (ILC Statute) ar t 16.
5ibid art 17. Before th e present topic , the only such re ferrals were by th e UN Economic
and Social Co uncil (ECOSOC) in t he 1950s; see ECOSOC Re solution 30 4D (XI) (17 July
1950) and 319B III (XI) (11 Aug ust 1950).
6The first ex ample is the 1973 Conve ntion on the Preve ntion and Punis hment of Crimes
against Inte rnationally P rotected Per sons, includi ng Diplomatic A gents, whic h is one of
the very fir st UN Counter-terr orist Conventi ons. The Gene ral Assembly a sked the ILC to
look at the issu e in 1971 (UNGA ‘Repor t of the Internat ional Law Comm ission’ UN Doc
A/RES/2780 (XXVI) (3 D ecember 1971)), and the C onvention was ad opted alread y two
years later, bas ed on the Draft A rticles the I LC had prepared . Another per tinent exampl e
is the draft t he ILC prepared fo r the Statute of an I nternational C riminal Cour t. The
General A ssembly reque st came in 1989. Five year s later, the ILC prese nted its final d raft
statute to th e General Ass embly and reco mmended that a co nference of
plenipoten tiaries be conve ned to negotiate a t reaty and enac t the Statute.
Received: 13 Novem ber 2019 
|
  Revised: 14 Januar y 2020 
|
  Accepted: 10 Februa ry 2020
DOI: 10 .1111/reel .12324
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE
Armed conflicts and the environment: The International Law
Commission’s new draft principles
Marja Lehto
© 2020 John Wile y & Sons Ltd, 9600 Gars ington Road, Oxf ord OX4 2DQ, UK and 350 Main St reet, Malden, M A 02148, USA.
Correspondence
Email: marja.lehto@formin.fi The International L aw Commission’s work on the protection of t he environment in re-
lation to armed conflic ts has produced 28 draft princip les with commentaries, which
the Commission adop ted in first reading in 2019. The article gives a n overview of
what the Commission has a ccomplished so far, the choices it has mad e and some of
the challenges that have b een encountered. The ar ticle discusses four gener al aspects
that characteri ze the topic: the temporal app roach, the interplay of several are as of
international law, the relian ce on the enhanced understanding of th e environmental
impacts of arme d conflicts and the normative natu re of the draft principles.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT