Current knowledge about OSC

AuthorLudwinek, Anna; Clevers, Franziska
Pages3-5
3
This chapter reviews the available academic and
non-academic publications in the area of childcare
provision outside of official school hours. As there is no
agreed common definition of OSC, Eurofound examined
different labels that have been applied by the research,
including ‘after-school care’ (Forsberg and Strandell,
2007), ‘out-of-school’ service (IBEC, 2016; OECD, 2016),
‘school-age care’ (Harms, 2013) or ‘wraparound
childcare’ (UK Government, 2017). In this report, all
these different types of care are regarded as OSC
services.
Overall, OSC has been a subject of research for several
reasons. The majority of the available publications have
assessed the national context2 or reviewed cases that
focused on the current status of childcare provision,
including its quality. It seems that the key driver and the
main research interest has been related to child
development and social integration. In those studies,
both formal and informal childcare provision were the
focus, with services for schoolchildren (OSC) as a
subcategory (Rutter and Evans, 2011; Janta, 2014). Such
a broad focus made it difficult to highlight the role and
the impact of the formal OSC provisions specifically. The
first international study covering the entire EU
determined that formal OSC is not yet adequately
provided (European Commission, 2013). Still,
systematic information from policy-driven research on
childcare for schoolchildren, while slowly increasing, is
scarce (European Commission, 2013; Cartmel and
Hayes, 2016; Plantenga and Remery, 2017).
The direct linkage between childcare services and the
improvement of equal employment opportunities or
work–life balance whilst not a new topic on the
European political agenda,3 as this literature review
shows this has not been an area of significant research
focus. Until recently little attention has been paid to the
linkages between out-of-school care services and the
labour situation of parents especially focusing on labour
integration of women (Barker et al, 2003; Skinner, 2005;
European Commission, 2013; Plantenga and Remery,
2017).
Research focus
Previously, the research focus on OSC provision
explored two different angles.
1. Predominantly, OSC activities and facilities were
studied in the context of child development and
well-being. Overall, there is a solid body of research
on OSC quality,4 which focuses on social and
academic benefits for the child along with the
aspiration to foster social cohesion and social
integration, especially for children with a migratory
background or children living in a
socioeconomically deprived context (Marshall et al,
1997; Horgan et al, 2018).
2. The other, still under-researched, area explores the
nexus of OSC provision as a tool to reconcile
work–life imbalances and parental labour market
participation. Cartmel and Grieshaber (2014, p. 23)
identify ‘a lack of understanding and appreciation
of the role played by SAC [school-age care] in the
lives of contemporary families’.
Types of OSC
OSC as a specific form of childcare can be provided
either formally or informally (Rutter and Evans, 2011;
Ellingsæter et al, 2017; UK Government, 2017; EVA,
2018). The consensus is that both types should include
homework support, recreational activities, sport and
creative events to foster positive child development or
to provide a protected environment. The latter is driven
by the idea of reconciling parental work–life balance
(Barker et al, 2003; OECD, 2011).
In cases where no formal OSC provisions are available
or they are not affordable, parents may depend on
informal childcare systems to reconcile school hours
with working hours. While, in many countries, the
provision of formal OSC is increasing, informal care still
plays a crucial role and, in some countries, may be the
preferred option (Rutter and Evans, 2011). Formal OSC
can be facilitated by schools but can also be delivered in
the school building. As Strandell (2013) highlighted,
1Current knowledge about OSC
2Most of those studies received government funding.
3 The nexus of childcare and family–work life had been taken up by the European Council with the ‘Barcelona targets’ in 2002. Those targets, however,
aimed at increasing childcare provision for children grouped into below three years and from three years until end of mandatory school age, thus, not
within the scope of this Eurofound study.
4Here, OSC means after-school clubs and other organised leisure or educational activities outside school hours.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT