Ocilion IPTV Technologies GmbH v Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH and Puls 4 TV GmbH & Co. KG.

JurisdictionEuropean Union
CourtCourt of Justice (European Union)
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2023:564
Docket NumberC-426/21
Date13 July 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 22 February 2024.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 22 February 2024
    ...1 du dispositif). 52 Arrêt SGAE (point 1 du dispositif). 53 Voir, en dernier lieu, arrêt du 13 juillet 2023, Ocilion IPTV Technologies (C‑426/21, EU:C:2023:564, point 47 et jurisprudence 54 Voir, en ce sens, ordonnance du 18 mars 2010, Organismos Sillogikis Diacheirisis Dimiourgon Theatriko......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 13 July 2023.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 13 July 2023
    ...presenti conclusioni. 18 V., in tal senso, conclusioni presentate dall’avvocato generale Szpunar nella causa Ocilion / IPTV Technologies (C‑426/21, EU:C:2022:999, paragrafi da 42 a 19 Tenuto conto delle difficoltà pratiche per identificare gli utenti privati e obbligarli a indennizzare i ti......
  • Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 15 January 2026.
    • European Union
    • Court of Justice (European Union)
    • 15 January 2026
    ...case-law cited). 12 See judgment in GEMA (paragraph 21 and the case-law cited.) 13 See judgment of 13 July 2023, Ocilion IPTV Technologies (C‑426/21, EU:C:2023:564, paragraph 58 and the case-law 14 See judgment in GEMA (paragraph 22 and the case-law cited). 15 See, inter alia, the judgments......