A Preliminary Perspective of Negotiations of EU–China PCA: A New Bottle Carrying Old Wine or New Wine or Both?

Published date01 January 2009
Date01 January 2009
AuthorLingliang Zeng
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00453.x
A Preliminary Perspective of Negotiations
of EU–China PCA: A New Bottle
Carrying Old Wine or New Wine or Both?
Zeng Lingliang*
Abstract: The EU–China Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is a rela-
tively new type of agreement between the EU and a third country, and its negotiation
and conclusion will bring about a new landscape for the comprehensive strategic part-
nership between the two sides. However, owing to the broadness, importance and com-
plexity of EU–China relations, and the unique multiple-level governance within the EU
itself, the negotiation and conclusion of the new PCA deems to be a hard and time-
consuming process. In light of the EU internal aspects, the new PCA seems to be related
to several treaty-making competences and procedures, thus probably with the form of a
mixed agreement as the final outcome. In terms of substantive issues, market access,
transparency, intellectual property rights, China’s full market economy status, aban-
donment of embargo on arms sales and high-tech trade, democracy, human rights, rule
of law, good governance and dispute settlement clauses, etc are all inevitably the tough
and core issues. Nevertheless, it is believed that both sides will strive to lay down a
systematic, stable and sustainable treaty law basis for a comprehensive EU–China stra-
tegic partnership in the spirit of seeking commonality, mutual respect and trust, and
equal consultation.
I Introduction
The launching of the negotiation and conclusion of a new EU–China Partnership and
Cooperation Agreement (EU–China PCA) is the strategic decision by leaders of both
sides on the bases of the consensus reached in recent years. Since the establishment of
the diplomatic relations between the EEC and China in 1975, on the whole, the bilateral
relations have been developing well, although there have been occasional ups and
* Faculty of Law, University of Macau. This article is the outcome of both the sub-project of the EU China
European Studies Centre Programme and Research on Important International Legal Issues in the
Chinese Peaceful Development under the Key Research Programmes in Human and Social Sciences
sponsored by the Chinese Ministry of Education. Thanks to the CERIC of University of Aix-Marseille III
for providing the research facilities. I especially owe my thanks to Professor Francis Snyder for his
constructive comments during our talks both in his office and at his home during my stay in Aix Provence
in the summer of 2007, his further comments, revisions and polish on the draft version and generous
provision for the forthcoming publications. However, this author is solely responsible for all views and any
mistakes in this article.
European Law Journal, Vol. 15, No. 1, January 2009, pp. 121–141.
© 2009 The Author
Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK
and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA
downs,1especially after the setting up of the regular meetings by leaders of both sides
in 1998. In 2001, leaders from both sides jointly called for a push forward of the EU–
China comprehensive partnership.2
In 2003, the Chinese Government published its first policy paper toward the EU,
which explicitly points out that it is an important part of Chinese foreign policy to
strengthen and continuously to develop EU–China relations. And China is endeavour-
ing to build a comprehensive partnership between the EU and China with long stabil-
ity. Soon after, the title of the EU Commission’s paper toward China defined the
EU–China relationship as ‘a maturing partnership’.3Almost at the same time, leaders
of both sides at their sixth summit meeting agreed that the enhancement and expansion
of various kinds of dialogues and consultations at various levels had shown the growing
maturing of the EU–China partnership and its increasing strategic significance.4In the
seventh summit meeting, leaders of both sides confirmed that they would continue
actively to explore the feasibility of concluding a new PCA so as to meet the continuous
development of the EU–China relations in recent years.5
It was at the thirtieth anniversary of EU–China diplomatic relations in 2005 and in
the Joint Statement of the eighth summit Meeting where both sides hoped to develop
further the strategic partnership by concrete actions and agreed to trigger the negotia-
tion of a new EU–China framework agreement as soon as possible so as to reflect the
breadth and depth of the EU–China strategic partnership.6
At the following summit meeting, the EU–China leaders reached the consensus to
start the negotiation of the PCA, which would cover all aspects of the relationship
between the two sides, including cooperation in political affairs. They further agreed
that the new negotiation would update the present EC–China Trade and Economic
Cooperation Agreement 1985 (EC–China TECA 1985) and the new TECA would be
implemented in a separate way.7Afterwards, there followed 12 rounds of technical
consultations at the working level on this new initiative. On 12 June 2007, the
EU–China Mixed Committee on Economics and Trade announced the official com-
mencement of negotiating the revision of TECA 1985.8
The EU–China PCA will be a new milestone in the process of building a sustainable
strategic partnership between the two sides. This article, mainly from a legal perspective
1The most noticeable setback was the sanctions implemented by the EC against China as condemning the
military measures taken by the latter to crash down the ‘Tianman Square Event’ in 1989.
2See the Joint Press Statement of the Fourth Summit Meeting of the EU–China Leaders (September 2001),
para 3, available at http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cgmu/chn/xwdt/t365252.htm.
3Commission Policy Paper for Transmission to the Council and the European Parliament, A maturing
partnership—shared interests and challenges in EU–China relations COM (2003) 533 final (updating
the European Commission’s Communications on EU–China relations of 1998 and 2001), available at
http://ec.europa.eu/external_relations/china/com_03_533/com_533_en.pdf.
4See the Joint Press Statement of the Sixth Summit Meeting of the EU–China Leaders (30 October 2003),
para 4, available at http://www.chinamission.be/chn/sgxx/t68500.htm.
5See the Joint Statement of the Seventh Summit Meeting of the EU–China Leaders (8 December 2004),
para 6, available at http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/wjdt/1179/t173757.htm.
6See the Joint Statement of the Eighth Summit Meeting of the EU–China Leaders (5 September 2005),
paras 2 and 6, available at http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/zxxx/t210460.htm.
7See the Joint Statement of the Ninth Summit Meeting of the EU–China Leaders (9 September 2006), paras
2 and 4, available at http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2006-09/10/content_5071191.htm.
8News Press Office of the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, the Twenty-Second EU–China Mixed
Committee on Economics and Trade Reached Consensus on 12 Points (18 June 2007), available at
http://www.chinamission.be/chn/sgxx/t338288.htm.
European Law Journal Volume 15
© 2009 The Author
122 Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT