Transnational Law and the EU: Reflections from WISH in China

AuthorFrancis Snyder,Lu Yi
Published date01 November 2013
Date01 November 2013
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12072
Transnational Law and the EU:
Reflections from WISH in China
Francis Snyder* and Lu Yi**
In his famous 1956 Storrs lectures at Yale Law School, Philip Jessup defined ‘trans-
national law’ as including ‘all law which regulates actions or events that transcend
national frontiers.’ Since then, however, globalisation, European integration, global
legal pluralism, the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the rise of
China and the other BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) have
profoundly altered the legal landscape. During the past decades, transnational law has
proliferated, to the extent that national legal systems have been internationalised, in
terms of sources and content of norms and of the craft knowledge of teachers,
researchers and legal professionals. Many new types of norms, legally binding or not,
originating from a multiplicity of sites of governance, now cut across national
boundaries. In many respects, it is easier to identify the numerous varieties of trans-
national law than it is to pinpoint laws and other norms, which remain purely
national or regional.
What is the future of transnational law? What does ‘transnational law’ mean in an
age marked by global legal pluralism and the emergence of new sites of governance in
virtually all domains of life? Are ‘public international law’ and ‘private international
law’ still ‘standard categories?’ Is all law today ‘transnational?’ Is transnational law a
legal system? How is transnational law connected to specific political systems or
territories? How is it relevant to citizens, governments and organisations? How does it
relate to regional, national and local cultures and traditions? Is transnational law
limited to major players on the international stage, such as the EU, the United States
and China? Does it reflect the rise of the BRICS? What does ‘transnational law’ have
to do with concerns such as gender, human rights, food safety, social solidarity ethics,
education, international labour relations, the emergence of regional or global
networks, the current environmental crisis or global governance? How have the BRICS
influenced these concerns and brought new issues of and challenges to transnational
law?
The 9th International Workshop for Young Scholars (WISH)/9ème Rencontre
international des jeunes chercheurs (RIJC) debated these questions. Its theme was ‘The
Future of Transnational Law: The EU, USA, China and the BRICS.’ The 9th WISH
was held at Peking University School of Transnational Law (STL), Shenzhen Graduate
* C.V. Starr Professor of Law, Jean Monnet Chair ad personam and Co-Director, Centre for Research
on Transnational Law, Peking University School of Transnational Law, Shenzhen Graduate School,
Shenzhen, China; Visiting Professor, London School of Economics. Founder and Editor-in-Chief,
European Law Journal.
** Assistant Director, Centre for Research on Transnational Law, Peking University School of Trans-
national Law, Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
bs_bs_banner
European Law Journal, Vol. 19, No. 6, November 2013, pp. 705–710.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK
and 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, USA

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT