Eucrim. European Law Forum: Prevention. Investigation. Prosecution - AZ
- Recalibrating Data Retention in the EU
- Improving Defence Rights
- The Use of Electronic Evidence in the European Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice An Introduction to the New EU Package on E-evidence
- La coopération pénale entre la Suisse et les États membres de l’Union européenne en matière de blanchiment d’argent
- The Directive on the Presumption of Innocence and the Right to Be Present at Trial
- The Directive on the Right to Legal Aid in Criminal and EAW Proceedings
- The Establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office
- Investigative and Sanctioning Powers of the ECB in the Framework of the Single Supervisory Mechanism
- Use of Administrative Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in Austria
- The Directive on Procedural Safeguards for Children who Are Suspects or Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings
- Implementation of Effective Measures against Fraud and Illegal Activities in Cohesion Policies
- OLAF Investigations Outside the European Union
- “Legalize It!?” – Opportunities and Challenges for the Regulation of Cannabis under European Law
- Protection of Fundamental Rights and Criminal Law
- Beyond Freezing?
- Refusal of European Arrest Warrants Due to Fair Trial Infringements
- The Directive on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings
- The Need for and Possible Content of EU Pre-trial Detention Rules
- The European ne bis in idem at the Crossroads of Administrative and Criminal Law
- Digital Iatrogenesis
- The Directive on the Presumption of Innocence
- Artificial Intelligence in Law Enforcement Settings
- Limitations of the Transnational ne bis in idem Principle in EU Law
- The European Commission’s Proposal on Cross-Border Access to E-Evidence
- The EPPO Implementation: A Perspective from Spain
- Directive 2010/64/EU on translation and interpretation services in criminal proceedings: A new quality seal or a missed opportunity? On its implementation in Germany, Poland and Spain
- The Future of EU Sanctions against Russia: Objectives, Frozen Assets, and Humanitarian Impact
- Disciplinary Sanctions against Judges: Punitive but not Criminal for the Strasbourg Court
- Classification of Electronic Data for Criminal Law Purposes
- Legal and Practical Challenges in the Application of the European Investigation Order
- Preuves électroniques : état de la situation en Suisse face à l’avancée majeure du droit européen
- Compliance with the Rule of Law in the EU and the Protection of the Union’s Budget
- The European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation on Preventing the Dissemination of Terrorist Content Online
- Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in the EU
- Mutual Admissibility of Evidence and Electronic Evidence in the EU A New Try for European Minimum Rules in Criminal Proceedings?
- A Reasoned Approach to Prohibiting the Bis in Idem
- Twenty Years since Tampere
- The Hybrid Architecture of the EPPO
- Gathering Electronic Evidence for Administrative Investigations Exploring an Under-the-Radar Area
- The Future of the European Union’s Financial Interests
- No Added Value of the EPPO?
- Unpacking the CLOUD Act
- The Influence of the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria
- Fighting Terrorism through the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO)?
- Effectiveness and Primacy of EU Law v. Higher National Protection of Fundamental Rights and National Identity
- Dealing with Uncertainties in the Pandemic
- Negotiation and Transposition of the PIF Directive ‒ The German Perspective
- ECHR and the CJEU
- Ending Impunity for the Violation of Sanctions through Criminal Law
- Der Rahmenbeschluss zu Abwesenheitsentscheidungen
- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office: How to Implement the Relations with Eurojust?
- War and Corruption in Ukraine
- The Fight against Money Laundering in the EU
- Recent Developments in EU Anti-Money Laundering
- Access to the Case Materials in Pre-Trial Stages
- The Reform of the Fight against Money Laundering in the EU
- Frontex: From Coordinating Controls to Combating Crime
- L’Europe à la poursuite des droits fondamentaux
- 10 Years after Lisbon – How “Lisbonised” is the Substantive Criminal Law in the EU?
- La confiance mutuelle sous pression dans le cadre du transfert de personnes condamnées au sein de l’Union Européenne
- Compensation for Unjustified Detention and the European Arrest Warrant
- Using US Artificial Intelligence to Fight Human Trafficking in Europe
- A Heavily Regulated Industry
- The European Investigation Order and its Relationship with Other Judicial Cooperation Instruments
- Application Problems Relating to “Ne bis in idem” as Guaranteed under Art. 50 CFR/Art. 54 CISA and Art. 4 Prot. No. 7 ECHR
- Cross-Border Crimes and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
- Yachts and Airplanes: What Procedures and Legal Theories Are Being Used to Forfeit Russian Assets in the United States?
- La révision de la quatrième directive anti-blanchiment à la lumière
- The EPPO and the Corporate Suspect – Jurisdictional Agnosticism and Legal Uncertainties
- Judicial Cooperation Between the EPPO and Third Countries
- A Game of Chance
- Potentials and Limits of Public-Private Partnerships against Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing
- The Anti-Money-Laundering Directive and the ECJ’s Jurisdiction on Data Retention
- Information Exchange Between Administrative and Criminal Enforcement: The Case of the ECB and National Investigative Agencies
- Judicial Concepts of Trust in Europe’s Multi-Level Security Governance
- Use and Abuse of the Concept of Fundamental Rights
- The OLAF Regulation – Evaluation and Future Steps
- The New Market Abuse Directive
- Adjusting to COVID-19 under the English Criminal Justice System
- The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Stress Test on the Right to Protection of Personal Data
- Every Euro Counts ... and So Does Every Second
- Why a Human Court?
- Are EU Administrative Penalties Reshaping the Estonian System of Sanctions?
- EU Eastern Partnership, Hybrid Warfare and Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office
- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office – More Effective, Equivalent, and Independent Criminal Prosecution against Fraud?
- The E-evidence Package The Happy Ending of a Long Negotiation Saga
- Eurojust and External Dimension of EU Judicial Cooperation
- Efficiency contra legem? Remarks on the Advocate General’s Opinion Delivered on 22 June 2023 in Case C-281/22 G.K. and Others (Parquet européen)
- Die Richtlinie 2010/64/EU zum Dolmetschen und Übersetzen in Strafverfahren: Neues Qualitätssiegel oder verpasste Chance?
- Criminal Liability of Heads of Business
- The AY Case – Construing EAW ne bis in idem within the Boundaries of the Preliminary Ruling Reference
- Independence of Public Prosecutors’ Offices
- The Directive on the Fight against Fraud to the Union’s Financial Interests by means of Criminal Law (PFI Directive)
- Electronic Evidence Collection in Cases of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office Legal Framework, Procedures, and Specifics
- European Implementation Assessment 2004-2020 on the European Arrest Warrant
- Ne bis in idem and Tax Offences
- Können die Regelungen über die Zusammenarbeit der EU-Mitgliedstaaten bei der Strafverfolgung kurzerhand aufgehoben werden?
- Fundamental Rights and Effectiveness in the European AFSJ
- Inaudito reo Proceedings, Defence Rights, and Harmonisation Goals in the EU
- Learning Lessons - Reflecting on Regulation 883/2013 through Comparative Analysis
- A Matter of Life & Death: Whistleblowing Legislation in the EU
- “Error 404 – Match not found”
- Die EU-Strafverfahrensrechtsrichtlinien vor deutschen Gerichten
- Vollstreckungshilfe zwischen Deutschland und Taiwan auf neuer Grundlage
- Paving the Way for Improved Mutual Assistance in the Context of Customs Fraud
- Extradition and the European Arrest Warrant in the Netherlands
- The Revision of the EU Framework on the Prevention of Money Laundering
- Towards More Efficient Compensation for Damage Caused by PIF Offences
- The Use of Inside Information
- Institutional Framework for EU Criminal Justice Cooperation
- Judicial Control of the Prosecutors’ Activities in the Light of the ECHR
- Obtaining Records from a Foreign Bank
- Mutual Recognition of Financial Penalties
- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Past, Present, and Future
- The Financial Execution Inquiry: A Bridge too Far?
- The European Investigation Order and the Respect for Fundamental Rights in Criminal Investigations
- Rethinking Judicial Cooperation between Africa and Europe
- Confiscation by Equivalent in Italian Legislation
- EPPO Institutionalization during the Bulgarian Council Presidency
- Le Principe de Légalité aux Termes de l’Article 7 de la Convention Européenne des Droits de l’Homme
- An Overall Analysis of the Proposal for a Regulation on Eurojust
- The Conflict of Competence between the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Spanish Prosecutors – Lessons Learned
- Mutual Recognition of Judgements in Criminal Matters Involving Deprivation of Liberty in Spain
- The Commission’s New Anti-Fraud Strategy – Enhanced Action to Protect the EU Budget
- The EPPO Faces its First Important Test: A Brief Analysis of the Request for a Preliminary Ruling in G. K. and Others
- A Europe of Costs and Values in the Criminal Justice Area
- Strengthening of International Cooperation in Criminal Matters: Extradition and Mutual Legal Assistance
- The Cost(s) of Non-Europe in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
- Reform des europäischen Datenschutzrechts
- Limits to European Harmonisation of Criminal Law
- Corruption and Bribery in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Protecting the EU’s Financial Interests through Criminal Law: the Implementation of the “PIF Directive”
- OLAF – 20 Years of Protecting the Financial Interests of the EU
- État des lieux des programmes de protection des témoins et des collaborateurs de justice dans le domaine du crime organisé et du terrorisme
- Typologies of EU Fraud
- The Commission Proposal Amending the OLAF Regulation
- OLAF at the Gates of Criminal Law
- The Players in the Protection of the EU’s Financial Interests
- Measuring the Added Value of EU Criminal Law
- Better Regulation in European Criminal Law
- Interinstitutional Relationship of European Bodies in the Fight against Crimes Affecting the EU’s Financial Interests
- Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture in Canada: The Example of Three Outlaw Motorcycle Gang Clubhouses
- All Roads Lead to Rome: The New AFSJ Package and the Trajectory to Europe 2020
- Implementation of the Legal Aid Directive in Spain
- VAT Carousel Fraud in the EU
- Great Expectations from the Court of Justice
- The Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism
- Editorial eucrim 1-2021
- Repercussions of the Establishment of the EPPO via Enhanced Cooperation
- Protecting the EU’s Financial Interest in the New Recovery and Resilience Facility – The Role of the European Anti-Fraud Office
- Guest editorial eucrim 4/2020
- Legal Protection of Minors
- The Harmonisation of Criminal Sanctions in the European Union - A New Approach
- EU’s Criminal Policy and the Possible Contents of a New Multi-Annual Programme
- OLAF Investigations in a Multi-Level System
- European Perspectives on Rights for Victims of Crime
- The Proposal on Electronic Evidence in the European Union
- The European Anti-Fraud Office and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office : A Work in Progress
- Criminal and Administrative Procedures in Protecting the Financial Interests of the EU
- The New Union Anti-Fraud Programme
- Addressing the Problems of Jurisdictional Conflicts in Criminal Matters within the EU
- The New Frontier of PFI Investigations
- The State of Transposition by France of the EU Directives on the Rights of Suspects in Criminal Proceedings
- The EPPO’s Hybrid Structure and Legal Framework
- The Directive on the Right to Information
- Civil Asset Recovery: The American Experience
- La coopération en matière pénale entre le Parquet européen et la Suisse comme État tiers
- Feuille de route et droits de la défense
- Le notariat italien et européen en première ligne dans la lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent
- Cooperation between the European Commission and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office
- The European Commission’s Proposal for Strengthening Whistleblower Protection
- The Role of Local Authorities in the Prevention of and Fight against Money Laundering
- Asking the Right Questions: Interviewing in PIF Investigations
- Remote Biometric Identification and Emotion Recognition in the Context of Law Enforcement From the AI Regulation Proposed by the Commission to the EU Co-Legislators’ Positions
- The Initiative for a Directive on the Protection of the EU Financial Interests by Substantive Criminal Law
- L’échange d’informations entre autorités administratives et judiciaires
- The Dutch Judge of Instruction and the Public Prosecutor in International Judicial Cooperation
- The “Europeanization” of Financial Supervision in the Aftermath of the Crisis
- Strengthening the Fight against Economic and Financial Crime within the EU
- Critical Issues in the New EU Regulation on Electronic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
- La naissance d’un Parquet européen – les enjeux de sa mise en œuvre en France
- Harmonization of Procedural Safeguards of Suspected and Accused Persons
- Council of Europe Convention Against Trafficking of Human Organs
- Die Regulierung des (grenzüberschreitenden) Zugangs zu elektronischen Beweismitteln Aktuelle nationale, europa- und völkerrechtliche Entwicklungen
- Tracking and Tracing Stolen Assets in Foreign Jurisdictions
- Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2018
- The EPPO and the Fight against VAT Fraud: a Legal Obstacle in the Regulation?
- Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2019
- Guest editorial eucrim 2-2022
- Guest editorial eucrim 4-2021
- Guest Editorial eucrim 2/2019
- Guest Editorial eucrim 4/2017
- Editorial eucrim 2/2020
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters
- Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2020
- Guest Editorial eucrim 2/2018
- Guest Editorial eucrim 3/2018
- EPPO: A Challenging, Balance-Striking Exercise in the National and EU Judicial Environment
- Guest editorial eucrim 1-2022