Orders nº T-383/03 of Court of First Instance of the European Communities, November 17, 2008

• Resolution Date: November 17, 2008
• Issuing Organization: Court of First Instance of the European Communities
• Decision Number: T-383/03

(Removal from the register)

In Case T-383/03,

Hynix Semiconductor Inc., established in Kyoungi-Do (Korea), represented by J.-F. Bellis, lawyer,

applicant,

supported by

Korean Exchange Bank, established in Seoul (Korea), represented by J. Bourgeois, lawyer

and by

Citibank NA Seoul Branch (Korea), established in Seoul (Korea), represented by F. Petillion, lawyer,

interveners,

v

Council of the European Union, represented by M. Bishop, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer,

defendant,

supported by,

Micron Technology Italia Srl, established in Avezzano AQ (Italy) and Micron Europe Ltd, established in Crowthorne (United Kingdom), represented by B. Connor, Solicitor and D. Luff, lawyer,

Commission of the European Communities, represented by T. Scharf and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents,

and by

Infineon Technologies AG, established in Munich (Germany), represented by M. Schütte, lawyer,

interveners,

APPLICATION for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 of 11 August 2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea.

1 By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 14 November 2003, Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (hereinafter ‘Hynix’), a company governed by Korean law established in Kyoungi-Do (Korea), brought an action for the annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1480/2003 of 11 August 2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea (OJ 2003, L 212, p. 1; hereinafter ‘the contested regulation’). Hynix claims that the contested regulation should be annulled in its entirety or, in the alternative, partially.

2 By letters received at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 28 January, 16 February and 11 March 2004 respectively, Micron Europe Ltd, a company governed by English law established in Berkshire (United Kingdom), and Micron Technology Italia, Srl, a company governed by Italian law established in Avezzano (Italy) (hereinafter together referred to as ‘Micron’), the Commission, and Infineon Technologies AG (hereinafter ‘Infineon’), a company governed by German law established in Munich (Germany), applied for leave to intervene...