Orders nº T-459/07 of Court of First Instance of the European Communities, October 15, 2009

• Resolution Date: October 15, 2009
• Issuing Organization: Court of First Instance of the European Communities
• Decision Number: T-459/07

(Preliminary issues – Withdrawal of a document from the case‑file – Removal of a sentence from the case‑file)

In Case T‑459/07,

Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd, established in Hangzhou (China), represented by M. Gambardella and V. Villante, lawyers,

applicant,

v

Council of the European Union, represented by J.‑P. Hix, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch and G. Wolf, lawyers,

defendant,

supported by

Commission of the European Communities, represented by H. van Vliet and K. Talabér‑Ritz, acting as Agents,

Osram GmbH, established in Munich (Germany), represented by R. Bierwagen, lawyer,

interveners,

APPLICATION for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 of 15 October 2007 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and extending to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines (OJ 2007 L 272, p. 1),

THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Fourth Chamber),

composed of O. Czúcz, President, I. Labucka and K. O’Higgins (Rapporteur), Judges,

Registrar: E. Coulon,

makes the following

Order

1 By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 17 December 2007, Hangzhou Duralamp Electronics Co., Ltd (‘Hangzhou’ or ‘the applicant’) brought the present action, in which it seeks the annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 of 15 October 2007 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and extending to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines (OJ 2007 L 272, p. 1; ‘the contested regulation’).

2 By application lodged at the Registry of the Court of First Instance on 21 December 2007, Philips Lighting Poland S.A. and Philips Lighting BV also brought an action against the Council of the European Union for annulment of the contested regulation (Case T‑469/07).

3 By order of the President of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 12 June 2008, Osram GmbH was granted leave to intervene in the...