Council Directive 75/362/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in medicine, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services

Published date30 June 1975
Official Gazette PublicationOfficial Journal of the European Communities, L 167, 30 June 1975
EUR-Lex - 31975L0362 - EN

Council Directive 75/362/EEC of 16 June 1975 concerning the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications in medicine, including measures to facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to provide services

Official Journal L 167 , 30/06/1975 P. 0001 - 0013
Greek special edition: Chapter 06 Volume 1 P. 0196
Spanish special edition: Chapter 06 Volume 1 P. 0186
Portuguese special edition Chapter 06 Volume 1 P. 0186


++++

( 1 ) OJ NO C 101 , 4 . 8 . 1970 , P . 19 .

( 2 ) OJ NO C 36 , 28 . 3 . 1970 , P . 17 .

( 3 ) SEE PAGE 14 OF THIS OFFICIAL JOURNAL .

( 4 ) OJ NO L 257 , 19 . 10 . 1968 , P . 2 .

( 5 ) SEE PAGE 19 OF THIS OFFICIAL JOURNAL .

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 16 JUNE 1975 CONCERNING THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS IN MEDICINE , INCLUDING MEASURES TO FACILITATE THE EFFECTIVE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT AND FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES

( 75/362/EEC )

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY , AND IN PARTICULAR ARTICLES 49 , 57 , 66 AND 235 THEREOF ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE PROPOSAL FROM THE COMMISSION ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE OPINION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ( 1 ) ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE OPINION OF THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE ( 2 ) ;

WHEREAS , PURSUANT TO THE TREATY , ALL DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT BASED ON NATIONALITY WITH REGARD TO ESTABLISHMENT AND PROVISION OF SERVICES IS PROHIBITED AS FROM THE END OF THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD ; WHEREAS THE PRINCIPLE OF SUCH TREATMENT BASED ON NATIONALITY APPLIES IN PARTICULAR TO THE GRANT OF ANY AUTHORIZATION REQUIRED TO PRACTISE AS A DOCTOR AND ALSO TO THE REGISTRATION WITH OR MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR BODIES ;

WHEREAS IT NEVERTHELESS SEEMS DESIRABLE THAT CERTAIN PROVISIONS BE INTRODUCED TO FACILITATE THE EFFECTIVE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF ESTABLISHMENT AND FREEDOM TO PROVIDE SERVICES IN RESPECT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF DOCTORS ;

WHEREAS , PURSUANT TO THE TREATY , THE MEMBER STATES ARE REQUIRED NOT TO GRANT ANY FORM OF AID LIKELY TO DISTORT THE CONDITIONS OF ESTABLISHMENT ;

WHEREAS ARTICLE 57 ( 1 ) OF THE TREATY PROVIDES THAT DIRECTIVES BE ISSUED FOR MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS ; WHEREAS THE AIM OF THIS DIRECTIVE IS THE RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS WHEREBY ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF MEDICINE CAN BE TAKEN UP AND PURSUED AND THE RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS IN RESPECT OF SPECIALISTS ;

WHEREAS , WITH REGARD TO THE TRAINING OF THE SPECIALIST , MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF TRAINING QUALIFICATIONS IS ADVISABLE WHERE THESE QUALIFICATIONS , WHILE NOT BEING A CONDITION OF ACCESS TO TAKE UP THE ACTIVITIES OF A SPECIALIST , NONETHELESS ENTITLE HIM TO USE A SPECIALIST TITLE ;

WHEREAS , IN VIEW OF THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE MEMBER STATES , REGARDING THE NUMBER OF MEDICAL SPECIALTIES AND THE TYPE OR THE LENGTH OF TRAINING COURSES FOR SUCH SPECIALTIES , CERTAIN COORDINATING PROVISIONS INTENDED TO ENABLE MEMBER STATES TO PROCEED WITH THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS SHOULD BE LAID DOWN ; WHEREAS SUCH COORDINATION HAS BEEN EFFECTED BY COUNCIL DIRECTIVE NO 75/363/EEC ( 3 ) OF 16 JUNE 1975 CONCERNING THE COORDINATION OF PROVISIONS LAID DOWN BY LAW , REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN RESPECT OF THE ACTIVITIES OF DOCTORS ;

WHEREAS THE COORDINATION REFERRED TO ABOVE WAS NOT INTENDED TO HARMONIZE ALL THE PROVISIONS OF THE MEMBER STATES ON THE TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS AND IT IS NEVERTHELESS APPROPRIATE TO PROCEED WITH THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS AS A SPECIALIST WHICH ARE NOT COMMON TO ALL THE MEMBER STATES , WITHOUT HOWEVER EXCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF SUBSEQUENT HARMONIZATION IN THIS FIELD ; WHEREAS IT WAS CONSIDERED IN THIS CONNECTION THAT RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS AS A SPECIALIST MUST BE RESTRICTED TO THOSE MEMBER STATES WHERE SUCH SPECIALIZATION IS KNOWN ;

WHEREAS , WITH REGARD TO THE POSSESSION OF A FORMAL CERTIFICATE OF TRAINING , SINCE A DIRECTIVE ON THE MUTUAL RECOGNITION OF DIPLOMAS DOES NOT NECESSARILY IMPLY EQUIVALENCE IN THE TRAINING COVERED BY SUCH DIPLOMAS , THE USE OF SUCH QUALIFICATIONS SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED ONLY IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE MEMBER STATE OF ORIGIN OR OF THE MEMBER STATE FROM WHICH THE FOREIGN NATIONAL COMES ;

WHEREAS , TO FACILITATE THE APPLICATION OF THIS DIRECTIVE BY THE NATIONAL AUTHORITIES , MEMBER STATES MAY PRESCRIBE THAT , IN ADDITION TO FORMAL CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING , THE PERSON WHO SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS OF TRAINING REQUIRED BY THIS DIRECTIVE MUST PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE FROM THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF HIS COUNTRY OF ORIGIN OR OF THE COUNTRY FROM WHICH HE COMES STATING THAT THESE CERTIFICATES OF TRAINING ARE THOSE COVERED BY THE DIRECTIVE ;

WHEREAS THIS DIRECTIVE DOES NOT AFFECT THE PROVISIONS LAID DOWN BY LAW , REGULATION OR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION IN THE MEMBER STATES , WHICH PROHIBIT COMPANIES OR FIRMS FROM PRACTISING MEDICINE OR IMPOSE ON THEM CERTAIN CONDITIONS FOR SUCH PRACTICE ;

WHEREAS , IN THE CASE OF THE PROVISION OF SERVICES , THE REQUIREMENT OF REGISTRATION WITH OR MEMBERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR BODIES , SINCE IT IS RELATED TO THE FIXED AND PERMANENT NATURE OF THE ACTIVITY PURSUED IN THE HOST COUNTRY , WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY CONSTITUTE AN OBSTACLE TO THE PERSON WISHING TO PROVIDE THE SERVICE , BY REASON OF THE TEMPORARY NATURE OF HIS ACTIVITY ; WHEREAS THIS REQUIREMENT SHOULD THEREFORE BE ABOLISHED ; WHEREAS HOWEVER , IN THIS EVENT , CONTROL OVER PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE , WHICH IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THESE PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OR BODIES , SHOULD BE GUARANTEED ; WHEREAS , TO THIS END , IT SHOULD BE PROVIDED , SUBJECT TO THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 62 OF THE TREATY , THAT THE PERSON CONCERNED MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF THE HOST MEMBER STATE PARTICULARS RELATING TO THE PROVISION OF SERVICES ;

WHEREAS , WITH REGARD TO THE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO GOOD CHARACTER AND GOOD REPUTE , A DISTINCTION SHOULD BE DRAWN BETWEEN THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE SATISFIED ON FIRST TAKING UP THE PROFESSION AND THOSE TO BE SATISFIED TO PRACTICE IT ;

WHEREAS , AS FAR AS THE ACTIVITIES OF EMPLOYED DOCTORS ARE CONCERNED , COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC ) NO 1612/68 ( 4 ) OF 15 OCTOBER 1968 ON FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT FOR WORKERS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY , LAYS DOWN NO SPECIFIC PROVISIONS RELATING TO GOOD CHARACTER OR GOOD REPUTE , PROFESSIONAL DISCIPLINE OR USE OF TITLE FOR THE PROFESSIONS COVERED ; WHEREAS , DEPENDING ON THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBER STATE , SUCH RULES ARE OR MAY BE APPLICABLE BOTH TO EMPLOYED AND SELF-EMPLOYED PERSONS ; WHEREAS THE ACTIVITIES OF DOCTORS ARE SUBJECT IN ALL MEMBER STATES TO POSSESSION OF A DIPLOMA , CERTIFICATE OR OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATION IN MEDICINE ; WHEREAS SUCH ACTIVITIES ARE PURSUED BY BOTH EMPLOYED AND SELF-EMPLOYED PERSONS , OR BY THE SAME PERSONS IN BOTH CAPACITIES IN THE COURSE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL CAREER ; WHEREAS , IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE AS FAR AS POSSIBLE THE FREE MOVEMENT OF THOSE PROFESSIONAL PERSONS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY , IT THEREFORE APPEARS NECESSARY TO EXTEND THIS DIRECTIVE TO EMPLOYED DOCTORS ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE :

CHAPTER I

SCOPE

ARTICLE 1

THIS DIRECTIVE SHALL APPLY TO THE ACTIVITIES OF DOCTORS .

CHAPTER II

DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS IN MEDICINE

ARTICLE 2

EACH MEMBER STATE SHALL RECOGNIZE THE DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS AWARDED TO NATIONALS OF MEMBER STATES BY THE OTHER MEMBER STATES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 1 OF DIRECTIVE NO 75/363/EEC AND WHICH ARE LISTED IN ARTICLE 3 , BY GIVING SUCH QUALIFICATIONS , AS FAR AS THE RIGHT TO TAKE UP AND PURSUE THE SELF-EMPLOYED ACTIVITIES OF A DOCTOR IS CONCERNED , THE SAME EFFECT IN ITS TERRITORY AS THOSE WHICH THE MEMBER STATE ITSELF AWARDS .

ARTICLE 3

THE DIPLOMAS , CERTIFICATES AND OTHER EVIDENCE OF FORMAL QUALIFICATIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2 ARE AS FOLLOWS :

( A ) IN GERMANY :

1 . " ZEUGNIS UEBER DIE AERZTLICHE STAATSPRUEFUNG " ( THE STATE EXAMINATION CERTIFICATE IN MEDICINE ) AWARDED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES AND THE " ZEUGNIS UEBER DIE VORBEREITUNGSZEIT ALS MEDIZINALASSISTENT " ( CERTIFICATE STATING THAT THE PREPARATORY PERIOD AS MEDICAL ASSISTANT HAS BEEN COMPLETED ) IN SO FAR AS GERMAN LAW STILL REQUIRES SUCH A PERIOD TO COMPLETE MEDICAL TRAINING ;

2 . THE CERTIFICATES FROM THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY STATING THAT THE DIPLOMAS AWARDED AFTER 8 MAY 1945 BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC ARE RECOGNIZED AS EQUIVALENT TO THOSE LISTED IN POINT 1 ABOVE ;

( B ) IN BELGIUM :

" DIPLOME LEGAL DE DOCTEUR EN MEDECINE , CHIRURGIE ET ACCOUCHEMENTS/WETTELIJK DIPLOMA VAN DOCTOR IN DE GENEES - , HEEL - EN VERLOSKUNDE " ( DIPLOMA OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE , SURGERY AND OBSTETRICS REQUIRED BY LAW ) AWARDED BY THE UNIVERSITY FACULTIES OF MEDICINE , THE CENTRAL EXAMINING BOARD OR THE STATE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION EXAMINING BOARD ;

( C ) IN DENMARK :

" BEVIS FOR BESTAAET LAEGEVIDENSKABELIG EMBEDSEKSAMEN " ( DIPLOMA OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE REQUIRED BY LAW ) AWARDED BY A UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF MEDICINE AND " DOKUMENTATION FOR GENNEMFOERT PRAKTISK UDDANNELSE " ( CERTIFICATE OF PRACTICAL TRAINING ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITIES OF THE HEALTH SERVICE ) ;

( D ) IN FRANCE :

1 . " DIPLOME D ' ETAT DE DOCTEUR EN MEDECINE " ( STATE DIPLOMA OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE ) AWARDED BY THE UNIVERSITY FACULTIES OF MEDICINE , THE UNIVERSITY JOINT FACULTIES OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY , OR BY THE UNIVERSITIES ;

2 . " DIPLOME D '...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex