Impact on institutions

• Author: European Education and Culture Executive Agency (European Commission)
• Pages: 41-43

41

INTRAACP ACADEMIC MOBILITY SCHEME  SCHOLARSHIP HOLDERS’ IMPACT SURVEY RESULTS

TITLE

© AP undened / Source : EC Audiovisual Service / Photo : Lionel Cironneau

5. IMPACT ON INSTITUTIONS

The PhD and Sta scholarship recipients have given their views on the impact of their individual

mobility on both the home and the host institutions (Figure 46-47). For more information on the

regional trends, please see Annex VI.

According to the survey results, the most signicant positive eect on home universities can be

observed in the strengthened research capacity (69), development of scientic/academic capacity

(67%), and research innovation (60%). The respondents also note that the host institutions have been

impacted the most in the same three areas just to a slightly lesser extent.

Besides, around half of the respondents also believe that attractiveness and visibility of both the

home and host institutions was enhanced thanks to their participation in the Programme.

16%

11%

10%

19%

42%

46%

34%

18%

19%

14%

13%

19%

27%

15%

9%

17%

8%

23%

22%

21%

25%

25%

23%

26%

26%

24%

22%

23%

21%

27%

25%

16%

15%

12%

14%

16%

19%

17%

11%

10%

14%

16%

18%

17%

17%

18%

20%

18%

18%

16%

14%

31%

34%

33%

26%

14%

14%

15%

23%

23%

30%

31%

29%

13%

26%

35%

29%

39%

17%

17%

16%

13%

8%

7%

11%

18%

15%

18%

17%

14%

14%

16%

22%

23%

27%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Creation of new programmes/courses

Harmonisation of curricula

Production of new curricular materials

Development of new training/teaching techniques

Development of scientific/academic capacities

Strengthening research capacity

Fostering research innovation

Development of administrative and management capacities

Development and management of procedures to implement

international projects

Development of international project management

units/international relations offices

Development of quality assurance processes

Development of student/mobility support services

Enhancement of attractiveness/visibility/reputation on

regional/national/global leve l

Fostering structured inter-institutional cooperation (for instance

through agreements, memorandum of understandings, etc.)

Development of links with governments, enterprises, NGOs

Broadening access to higher education for people from

vulnerable or underrepresented groups in your country

Contribution to changes in national legislation for higher

education cooperation

To a great extent To a moderate extent To a small extent Not at all I do not know

Figure 46 - Please rate to which extent the activities carried out during your mobility period had a positive

impact on your home institution in the following aspects (n=354)

5. IMPACT ON INSTITUTIONS