Overall evaluation of the mobility experience

• Author: European Education and Culture Executive Agency (European Commission)
• Pages: 29-31

29

INTRAACP ACADEMIC MOBILITY SCHEME  SCHOLARSHIP HOLDERS’ IMPACT SURVEY RESULTS

TITLE3. OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE MOBILITY EXPERIENCE

© AP undened / Source : EC Audiovisual Service / Photo : Lionel Cironneau

3. OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE

MOBILITY EXPERIENCE

The purpose of this part of the publication is to analyse the level of satisfaction of the respondents,

determine their main activities during mobility, and assess the impact at individual and institutional

levels. For more information on the regional trends, please see Annex VI.

Overall, a large majority of the respondents express their satisfaction with the guidance received

during the mobility by the partnerships (87), the academic structures at the host university (84),

and the quality of the activities (86%). Likewise, the satisfaction rate for the logistical support

provided before the mobility (78%), the administrative structures of the host institution (81%), and

the overall logistical support (77%) is high (Figure 27).

However, the results also indicate that there is a room for improvement when it comes to collecting

scholarship holders’ feedback by the partner universities, as well as using it to address any issues

that might have arisen. Slightly more than half of the survey participants note that they were asked

for regular feedback (51), while even less respondents believe that their input was used to improve

the mobility experience (47).



47%

39%

41%

45%

34%

37%

31%

21%

15%

40%

45%

45%

43%

44%

44%

46%

40%

33%

7%

10%

10%

7%

13%

12%

14%

23%

22%

4%

5%

4%

3%

8%

6%

7%

13%

14%

1%

1%

1%

1%

2%

2%

2%

4%

16%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

I received adequate and useful academic/work/research

guidance and mentoring (for instance from my academic

supervisor advisors, peers, researchers, host instuon)

My host university had adequate academic/work/research

structures to receive me/support me

I was sased with the quality of the acvies that I pursued

at the host university (for instance studies, training, research)

The acvies that I followed matched my

learning/work/research plan or my previous experience

I received adequate and useful preparatory

logisal/administrave support to organise my mobility from

the host university/coordinator before my mobility period

My host university had adequate logisal/administrave

structures to receive me/support me (for instance

Internaonal relaons oce or contact person)

I was sased with the logiscal/administrave support I

received

My host university asked me to provide regular feedback on

my mobility experience/content

My feedback was taken into account to improve my mobility

experience/content



  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 



Figure 27 - Please rate the following statements in relation to your mobility period (n=922)